Climatic Change

, Volume 124, Issue 1–2, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Finding your place on the science – advocacy continuum: an editorial essay

Essay

Abstract

The late founder of this journal, Stephen Schneider, argued that climate scientists must find the right balance between being honest about the limits of our knowledge and being effective in communicating the risks that climate change poses to society. The worlds of science and communications have changed dramatically in the years since Schneider first described this “double ethical bind”. Yet for most scientists, the core challenge of public communication remains. How do we choose between what we perceive as science – being honest – and what we perceive as advocacy – being effective? This essay suggests that scientists should view science and advocacy as opposite ends of a continuum with many possible positions. Drawing upon findings from psychology, communications, and science and technology studies, I describe how scientists can use research and critical self-analysis to be “scientific” about public engagement and to choose a suitable place for themselves on the science-advocacy continuum.

References

  1. Brysse K, Oreskes N, O’Reilly J, Oppenheimer M (2013) Climate change prediction: erring on the side of least drama? Glob Environ Chang 23:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fischhoff B (2007) Nonpersuasive communication about matters of greatest urgency: climate change. Env Sci Technol 41:7204–08CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gauchat G (2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. Am Socio Rev 77:167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hansen J (2009) Storms of my grandchildren: the truth about the coming climate catastrophe and our last chance to save humanity. Bloomsbury Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Kahan DM (2010) Fixing the communications failure. Nature 463:296–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Clim Change 2:732–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lackey RT (2007) Science, scientists, and policy advocacy. Conserv Biol 21:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2011) Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in May 2011. Yale University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  9. Markowitz EM, Shariff AF (2012) Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Clim Change 2:243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Meyer JL, Frumhoff HC, Hamburg SP, de la Rosa C (2010) Above the din but in the fray: environmental scientists as effective advocates. Fron Ecol Env 8:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moser SC, Dilling LR (2011) Communicating climate change: closing the science-action gap. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–174Google Scholar
  12. Nelson MP, Vucetich JA (2009) On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how. Conserv Biol 23:1090–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nisbet MC (2009) Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51:12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oppenheimer M (2011) What roles can scientists play in public discourse? EOS, Trans AGU 92:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pielke RA Jr (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schneider SH (1988) The greenhouse effect and the U.S. summer of 1988: cause and effect or a media event: an editorial. Clim Change 13:113–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schneider SH (2000) Is the “citizen-scientist” an oxymoron. In: Kleinman D (ed) Beyond the science wars: science, technology and democracy. State University of New York, Albany, pp 102–120Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations