Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal water depth management on river-fed National Wildlife Refuges in a changing climate

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prairie pothole region (PPR) in the north-central United States and south-central Canada constitutes the most important waterfowl breeding area in North America. Projected long-term changes in precipitation and temperature may alter the drivers of waterfowl abundance: wetland availability and emergent vegetation cover. Previous studies have focused on isolated wetland dynamics, but the implications of changing precipitation on managed, river-fed wetlands have not been addressed. Using a structured decision making (SDM) approach, we derived optimal water management actions for 20 years at four river-fed National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs) in North and South Dakota under contrasting increasing/decreasing (+/−0.4 %/year) inflow scenarios derived from empirical trends. Refuge pool depth is manipulated by control structures. Optimal management involves setting control structure heights that have the highest probability of providing a desired mix of waterfowl habitat, given refuge capacities and inflows. We found optimal seasonal control structure heights for each refuge were essentially the same under increasing and decreasing inflow trends of 0.4 %/year over the next 20 years. Results suggest managed pools in the NWRs receive large inflows relative to their capacities. Hence, water availability does not constrain management; pool bathymetry and management tactics can be greater constraints on attaining management objectives than climate-mediated inflow. We present time-dependent optimal seasonal control structure heights for each refuge, which are resilient to the non-stationary precipitation scenarios we examined. Managers can use this information to provide a desired mixture of wildlife habitats, and to re-assess management objectives in reserves where pool bathymetry prevents attaining the currently stated objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NWR:

National wildlife refuge

PPR:

Prairie pothole region

SDM:

Structured decision making

SDP:

Stochastic dynamic programming

References

  • Ades A, Lu G, Claxton K (2004) Expected value of sample information calculations in medical decision modeling. Med Decis Mak 24:207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman R (1957) Dynamic programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce J, Martin H, Colucci P, McBean G, McDougall J, Shrubsole D, Whalley J, Halliday R (2003) Climate change impacts on boundary and transboundary water management. Final report. Climate change action fund project A458/402. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario

  • Conroy MJ, Runge MC, Nichols JD, Stodola KW, Cooper RJ (2011) Conservation in the face of climate change: the roles of alternative models, monitoring, and adaptation in confronting and reducing uncertainty. Biol Conserv 144:1204–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covich AP, Fritz SC, Lamb PJ, Marzolf RD, Matthews WJ, Poiani KA, Prepas EE, Richman MB, Winter TC (1997) Potential effects of climate change on aquatic ecosystems of the great plains of North America. Hydrol Process 11:993–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenlohr W (1972) Hydrologic investigations of prairie potholes in North Dakota, 1959–68. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 585-A

  • Fredrickson L, Taylor T (1982) Management of seasonally flooded impoundments for wildlife. US Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 148

  • Gregory R, Failing L, Harnstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D (2012) Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson F, Moore C, Kendall W, Dubovsky J, Caithamer D, Kelley J, Williams B (1997) Uncertainty and the management of mallard harvests. J Wildl Manag 61:202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WC, Millett BV, Gilmanov T, Voldseth RA, Guntenspergen GR, Naugle DE (2005) Vulnerability of Northern Prairie wetlands to climate change. Bioscience 55:863–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamond B, Boukhtouta A (1996) Optimizing long-term hydro power production using Markov decision processes. Int Trans Oper Res 3:223–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson DL (1995) Effects of climate on numbers of northern prairie wetlands. Clim Chang 30:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert R, Groves D (2010) Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American West. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77:960–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, Fackler P, Nichols J, Lubow B, Eaton M, Runge M, Stith B, Langtimm C (2011) Structured decision making as a proactive approach to dealing with sea level rise in Florida. Clim Chang 107:185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menne M, Williams C, Vose R (2011) United States historical climatology network. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/epubs/ndp/ushcn/ushcn.html. Accessed: 2nd November 2011

  • Millett B, Johnson WC, Guntenspergen G (2009) Climate trends of the North American prairie pothole region 1906–2000. Clim Chang 93:243–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD, Koneff MD, Heglund PJ, Knutson MG, Seamans ME, Lyons JE, Morton JM, Jones MT, Boomer GS, Williams BK (2011) Climate change, uncertainty, and natural resource management. J Wildl Manag 75:6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2011) Calculated evaporation climatology: national oceanic and atmospheric administration national weather service. http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/soilmst/eclim_frame.html. Accessed: 3rd January 2012

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poiani KA, Johnson WC (1993) Potential effects of climate change on a semi-permanent prairie wetland. Clim Chang 24:213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poiani KA, Johnson WC, Kittel TGF (1995) Sensitivity of a prairie wetland to increased temperature and seasonal precipitation changes. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 31:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puterman M (2005) Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic Programming. Wiley-Interscience

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge M, Converse S, Lyons J (2011) Which uncertainty? Using expert elicitation and expected value of information to design an adaptive program. Biol Conserv 144:1214–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Alley R, Berntsen T, Bindoff N, Chen Z, Chidthaisong C, Gregory J, Hegerl G, Heimann M, Hewitson B, Hoskins B, Joos F, Jouzel J, Kattsov V, Lohmann U, Matsuno T, Molina M, Nicholls N, Overpeck J, Raga G, Ramaswamy V, Ren J, Rusticucci M, Somerville R, Stocker T, Whetton P, Wood RA, Wratt D (2007) Technical summary. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

  • Sorenson LG, Goldberg R, Root TL, Anderson MG (1998) Potential effects of global warming on waterfowl populations breeding in the Northern Great Plains. Clim Chang 40:343–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka S, Zhu T, Lund J, Howitt R, Jenkins M, Pulido M, Tauber M, Ritzema R, Ferreira I (2006) Climate warming and water management adaptation for California. Clim Chang 76:361–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2000) Tewaukon National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2005) Sand Lake National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2006) Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2007) Arrowwood National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

  • Weller M (1978) Management of freshwater marshes for wildlife. In: Good R, Whigham D, Simpson R (eds) Freshwater wetlands: ecological processes and management potential. Academic Press, New York, pp 267–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter TC, Rosenberry DO (1998) Hydrology of prairie pothole wetlands during drought and deluge: a 17-year study of the cottonwood lake wetland complex in North Dakota in the perspective of longer term measured and proxy hydrological records. Clim Chang 40:189–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W (2011) A multi-objective optimization approach to allocate environmental flows to the artificially restored wetlands of China’s Yellow River delta. Ecol Model 222:261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff of Arrowwood, Lacreek, Sand Lake and Tewaukon NWRs. The authors also thank Julien Martin and Jennifer Roach for their constructive comments. Funding was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Geological Survey. The use of trade names or products does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sam Nicol

    Present address: CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775, USA

    Sam Nicol, Brad Griffith & Christine M. Hunter

  2. U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Fairbanks, AK, 99775-7020, USA

    Brad Griffith

  3. U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND, 58401, USA

    Jane Austin

Authors
  1. Sam Nicol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brad Griffith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jane Austin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christine M. Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Nicol.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online resource 1

(DOCX 5087 kb)

Online resource 2

(DOCX 201 kb)

Online resource 3

(DOCX 79 kb)

Online resource 4

(TAR 273 kb)

(TAR 5070 kb)

Online resource 5

(DOCX 13 kb)

Online resource 6

(XLSX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicol, S., Griffith, B., Austin, J. et al. Optimal water depth management on river-fed National Wildlife Refuges in a changing climate. Climatic Change 124, 271–284 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1033-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1033-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation