This paper conducts an analysis of the financial resource mobilization of the organizations that make up the climate change counter-movement (CCCM) in the United States. Utilizing IRS data, total annual income is compiled for a sample of CCCM organizations (including advocacy organizations, think tanks, and trade associations). These data are coupled with IRS data on philanthropic foundation funding of these CCCM organizations contained in the Foundation Center’s data base. This results in a data sample that contains financial information for the time period 2003 to 2010 on the annual income of 91 CCCM organizations funded by 140 different foundations. An examination of these data shows that these 91 CCCM organizations have an annual income of just over $900 million, with an annual average of $64 million in identifiable foundation support. The overwhelming majority of the philanthropic support comes from conservative foundations. Additionally, there is evidence of a trend toward concealing the sources of CCCM funding through the use of donor directed philanthropies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Pew Research Center Poll - October 2012
For a full explanation of the funding data analysis, see the Methodological Appendix, page 117 in the Supplemental Material.
IRS Category Descriptions:
501(c)(3) Religious, educational, charitable, scientific, or literary organizations; testing for public safety organizations. Also, organizations preventing cruelty to children or animals, or fostering national or international amateur sports competition
501(c)(4) Civic leagues, social welfare organizations, and local associations of employees
501(c)(5) Labor, agriculture, and horticultural organizations
501(c)(6) Business leagues, chambers of commerce, and real estate boards
The detailed data is provided in the Supplemental Material. Table S-6 (pages 39-42) lists grant totals by year made by foundations. Table S-7 (pages 43–44) lists recipient organizations of grants by year. Table S-8 (45–78) lists foundation grants to specific organizations, and Table S-9 (pages 79–112) lists organizations that received grants by foundation.
Anheier H, Daly S (2005) Philanthropic foundations; a new global force? In: Anheier J, Glasius M, Kaldor M (eds) Global civil society 2004/5. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 158–176
Antonio RJ, Brulle RJ (2011) The unbearable lightness of politics: climate change denial & political polarization. Sociol Q 52:195–202
Austin A (2002) Advancing accumulation and managing its discontents: the U.S. antienvironmental countermovement. Sociol Spectr 22:71–105
Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard
Brass D (1992) Power in organizations: a social network perspective. Res Polit Soc 4:295–323
Brulle RJ (2014) The development, structure, and influence of the U.S. national climate change movement. In: Wolinsky Y (ed) Climate change policy and civil society. Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington DC
Colwell MAC (1993) Private foundations and public policy: the political role of philanthropy. Garland Publishing Inc., New York
Cook KS, Whitmeyer JM (1992) Two approaches to social structure: exchange theory and network analysis. Annu Rev Sociol 18:109–27
Dunlap RE, Jacques PJ (2013) Climate change denial books and conservative think tanks: exploring the connection. Am Behav Sci 57
Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: Dryzek J, Norgaard R, Schlosberg D (eds) The oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 144–160
Elsasser S, Dunlap RE (2013) Leading voices in the Denier Choir: conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. Am Behav Sci 57
Fligstein N, McAdam D (2012) A theory of fields. Oxford University Press, New York
Fuchs S (2001) Against essentialism: a theory of culture and society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gale R (1986) Social Movements and the state: the environmental movement, countermovement, and government agencies. Sociol Perspect 29(2)
Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Am J Sociol 104(5):1439–93
Hoplin M, Robinson R (2008) Funding fathers: the unsung heroes of the conservative movement. Regnery Publishing, Washington DC
International Energy Agency (2012) World energy outlook 2012. International Energy Agency, Paris
Jacques PJ, Dunlap RE, Freeman M (2008) The organization of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Env Polit 17(3):349–385
Jenkins JC (1983) Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annu Rev Sociol 9:527–53
Knight G, Greenberg J (2011) Talk of the enemy: adversarial framing and climate change discourse. Soc Mov Stud 10(4):323–340
Knoke D (1990) Political networks: the structural perspective. Cambridge University Press
Knoke D, Yang S (2008) Social network analysis. Sage, Los Angeles
Levy D, Egan D (2003) A Neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. J Manag Stud 40:4
Lo CYH (1982) Countermovements and conservative movements in the contemporary U.S. Annu Rev Sociol 8:107–134
Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ, Hirsch PM (2003) Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural-political perspective on U.S. recycling. Soc Econ Rev 1:71–104
McCarthy J, Britt D, Wolfson M (1991) The institutional channeling of social movements in the United States. Res Soc Mov Confl Chang 13:45–76
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2000) Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Soc Probl 47(4):499–522
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2003) Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Soc Probl 50(3):348–373
Meyer DS, Staggenbord S (1996) Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. Am J Sociol 101(6)
Minkoff D, Agnone J (2010) Consolidating social change: the consequences of foundation funding for developing social movement infrastructures. In: Anheier H, Hammack D (eds) American foundations: roles and contributions. Brookings Press, Washington, pp 347–367
National Intelligence Council (2012) Global trends 2030: alternative worlds. Central Intelligence Agency, Washington
National Research Council (2012) Climate and social stress; implications for security analysis. National Academy of Sciences, Washington
National Research Council (NRC) (2011) America’s climate choices. National Academies Press, Washington
National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP) (1997) Moving a Public Policy Agenda: The Strategic Philanthropy of Conservative Foundations, Washington DC
Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Merchants of doubt. Bloomsbury Press, New York
Snow D (1992) Inside the environmental movement: meeting the leadership challenge. Island Press, Washington
Stefanic J, Delgado R (1996) No mercy: how conservative think tanks and foundations changed America’s social agenda. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
Walker JL (1991) Mobilizing interest groups in America: patrons, professions, and social movements. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
World Bank (2012) Turn down the heat: why a 4°C world must be avoided. World Bank, Washington
Ylvisaker N (1987) Foundations and nonprofit organizations. In: Powell WW (ed) The nonprofit sector: a research handbook. Yale University Press, New Haven
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
(PDF 2.06 mb)
About this article
Cite this article
Brulle, R.J. Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change 122, 681–694 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7
- Carbon Emission
- Social Movement
- Trade Association
- Anthropogenic Climate Change
- Resource Mobilization