Climatic Change

, Volume 122, Issue 1–2, pp 331–340 | Cite as

Climate change response in Europe: what’s the reality? Analysis of adaptation and mitigation plans from 200 urban areas in 11 countries

  • D. Reckien
  • J. Flacke
  • R. J. Dawson
  • O. Heidrich
  • M. Olazabal
  • A. Foley
  • J. J.-P. Hamann
  • H. Orru
  • M. Salvia
  • S. De Gregorio Hurtado
  • D. Geneletti
  • F. Pietrapertosa


Urban areas are pivotal to global adaptation and mitigation efforts. But how do cities actually perform in terms of climate change response? This study sheds light on the state of urban climate change adaptation and mitigation planning across Europe. Europe is an excellent test case given its advanced environmental policies and high urbanization. We performed a detailed analysis of 200 large and medium-sized cities across 11 European countries and analysed the cities’ climate change adaptation and mitigation plans. We investigate the regional distribution of plans, adaptation and mitigation foci and the extent to which planned greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions contribute to national and international climate objectives. To our knowledge, it is the first study of its kind as it does not rely on self-assessment (questionnaires or social surveys). Our results show that 35 % of European cities studied have no dedicated mitigation plan and 72 % have no adaptation plan. No city has an adaptation plan without a mitigation plan. One quarter of the cities have both an adaptation and a mitigation plan and set quantitative GHG reduction targets, but those vary extensively in scope and ambition. Furthermore, we show that if the planned actions within cities are nationally representative the 11 countries investigated would achieve a 37 % reduction in GHG emissions by 2050, translating into a 27 % reduction in GHG emissions for the EU as a whole. However, the actions would often be insufficient to reach national targets and fall short of the 80 % reduction in GHG emissions recommended to avoid global mean temperature rising by 2 °C above pre-industrial levels.

Supplementary material

10584_2013_989_MOESM1_ESM.doc (605 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 605 kb)


  1. Baker I, Peterson A, Brown G, McAlpine C (2012) Local government response to the impacts of climate change: an evaluation of local climate adaptation plans. Landsc Urban Plan 107(2):127–136. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett J, O’Neill S (2010) Maladaptation. Glob Environ Chang 20(2):211–213. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betsill M, Bulkeley H (2007) Looking Back and Thinking Ahead: A Decade of Cities and Climate Change Research. Local Environ 12(5):447–456Google Scholar
  4. Butler D, Spencer N (2010) The century of the city. Nature 467(7318):900–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carbon Disclosure Project (2012) Measurement for management: CDP cities 2012 global report—including special report on C40 cities, vol 2012. Carbon Disclosure ProjectGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmin J, Nadkami N, Rhie C (2012) Progress and challenges in urban climate adaptation planning: results of a global survey. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Castán Broto V, Bulkeley H (2012) A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Glob Environ Chang (0). doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005
  8. Corfee-Morlot J, Cochran I, Hallegatte S, Teasdale PJ (2011) Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Clim Chang 104(1):169–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson R (2007) Re-engineering cities: a framework for adaptation to global change. Philos Trans Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1861):3085–3098. doi:10.2307/25190643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawson R (2011) Potential pitfalls on the transition to more sustainable cities and how they might be avoided. Carbin Manag 2(2):175–188. doi:10.4155/CMT.11.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Sherbinin A, Schiller A, Pulsipher A (2007) The vulnerability of global cities to climate hazards. Environ Urban 19:39–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duren RM, Miller CE (2012) Measuring the carbon emissions of megacities. Nat Clim Chang 2(8):560–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)/PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (2011) Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), release version 4.2. Accessed 11 Sep 2013
  14. Eurostat (2010) European regional and urban statistics reference guide. Methodologies and working papers. European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  15. Eurostat (2013) What is the urban audit? Accessed 07 Oct 2013
  16. Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Heidrich O, Dawson RJ, Reckien D, Walsh CL (2013) Assessment of the climate preparedness of 30 urban areas in the UK. Clim Chang 120(4):771–784. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0846-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunt A, Watkiss P (2011) Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities: a review of the literature. Clim Chang 104(1):13–49. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9975-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson CA (2013) Political science: new climate alliances. Nat Clim Chang 3(6):537–538. doi:10.1038/nclimate1912 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kabat P, van Vierssen W, Veraart J, Vellinga P, Aerts J (2005) Climate proofing the Netherlands. Nature 438(7066):283–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kousky C, Schneider SH (2003) Global climate policy: will cities lead the way? Clim Pol 3(4):359–372. doi:10.1016/j.clipol.2003.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Millard-Ball A (2012) Do city climate plans reduce emissions? J Urban Econ 71(3):289–311. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2011.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFP, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith SJ, Stouffer RJ, Thomson AM, Weyant JP, Wilbanks TJ (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747–756. doi:10.1038/nature08823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Romero-Lankao P (2012) Governing carbon and climate in the cities: an overview of policy and planning challenges and options. Eur Plan Stud 20(1):7–26. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.638496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, Hammer SA, Mehrotra S (2010) Cities lead the way in climate-change action. Nature 467(7318):909–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, Hammer SA, Mehrotra S (2011) Climate change and cities: first assessment report of the urban climate change research network. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Satterthwaite D (2008) Cities’ contribution to global warming: notes on the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Urban 20(2):539–549. doi:10.1177/0956247808096127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Viguie V, Hallegatte S (2012) Trade-offs and synergies in urban climate policies. Nat Clim Chang 2(5):334–337. doi:10.1038/nclimate1434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Reckien
    • 1
  • J. Flacke
    • 2
  • R. J. Dawson
    • 3
  • O. Heidrich
    • 3
  • M. Olazabal
    • 4
    • 5
  • A. Foley
    • 6
    • 7
  • J. J.-P. Hamann
    • 8
  • H. Orru
    • 9
    • 10
  • M. Salvia
    • 11
  • S. De Gregorio Hurtado
    • 12
  • D. Geneletti
    • 13
  • F. Pietrapertosa
    • 11
  1. 1.Center for Research on Environmental DecisionsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC)University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.School of Civil Engineering and GeosciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
  4. 4.Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3)BilbaoSpain
  5. 5.Department of Land EconomyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  6. 6.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK
  7. 7.School of EngineeringUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  8. 8.Centre International de Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Développement (CIRED)Nogent-sur-Marne CedexFrance
  9. 9.Department of Public HealthUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  10. 10.Department of Public Health and Clinical MedicineUmea UniversityUmeåSweden
  11. 11.Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis–National Research Council of Italy (CNR-IMAA)Tito ScaloItaly
  12. 12.Ministerio de FomentoCentro de Estudios y Experimentación de Obras Públicas (CEDEX)MadridSpain
  13. 13.Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations