Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An institutional critique of new climate scenarios

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leading climate analysts are designing a set of new policy scenarios that will be used to frame future climate policy analyses. This new exercise seeks to improve the realism of the scenarios used in climate policy analysis. In recent decades, rational choice institutionalism (RCI) has increasingly influenced several social sciences. A systematic effort to apply findings and concepts borrowed from RCI studies would offer three types of benefits to this scenario exercise. First, it would increase internal consistency within each of the projected scenarios. Second, it would enhance the realism of the entire suite of scenarios. Third, it would illuminate a range of factors, trends, and causal pathways than might otherwise be considered. These gains could be exploited best by engaging some leading RCI scholars in the scenario building process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2012) Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Perrin N (2009) Climate adaptation, local institutions and rural livelihoods. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien KL (eds) Adapting to climate change:Thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 350–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston LJ, Mueller B (2010) Property rights, land conflict and tenancy in Brazil. Working Paper, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Bardhan P (2010) Awakening giants; feet of clay: Assessing the economic rise of China and India. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates RH (2010) Prosperity and violence: The political economy of development. W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosetti V, Carraro C, Tavoni M (2009) Climate policy after 2012. Technology, Timing, Participation. CESifo Economic Studies

  • Caplan B (2007) The myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • CENTRA Technology, Inc., Scritor Corporation (2009a). India, The impact of climate change to 2030: Geopolitical implications. National Intelligence Council Report, Washington: National Intelligence Council

  • CENTRA Technology Inc., Scitor Corporation (2009b) China: The impact of climate change to 2030. Geopolitical implications. A commissioned research report, Washington: National Intelligence Council

  • David PA (2006) Path dependence: a foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica. J Hist Econ Econ Hist 1(2):91–114

    Google Scholar 

  • David PA (2008) The historical origins of ‘open science’: an essay on patronage, reputation and common agency contracting in the scientific revolution. Capital Soc 3(2):1–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner DW (2007) All politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimes. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W (2006) The white man’s burden: Why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman D (2012) Is conflating climate with energy policy a good idea?. Econ Energy Env Pol 1(1):11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertman T (1997) Birth of the Leviathan: Building states and regimes in medieval and early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay R, O’Rourke KH (2007) Power and plenty: Trade, war, and the world economy in the second millennium. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg A (2011) A contest for supremacy: China, America, and the struggle for mastery in Asia. W.W. Norton & Compant Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin R (2001) Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin R (1975) U. S. Power and the multinational corporation: The political economy of foreign direct investment. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin R (1981) War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon RJ (2012) National Bureau of Economic Research. Is U.S. economic growth over? faltering inovation confronts the six headwinds. August 2012. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18315 (accessed August 4, 2013)

  • Groat CG, Grimshaw TW (2012) Fact-based regulation forenvironmental protection in shale gas development. Research report. Energy Institute, The University of Texas, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber L (2000) Ruling the world: Power politics and the rise of supranational institutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Tirpak DA et al (2007) Policies, instruments and Co-operative arrangements. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R (1997) Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson I, Weingast BR (2005) Intersections between historical and rational choice institutionalism. In: Ira K, Weingast BR (eds) Preferences and situations: Points of intersection between historical and rational choice institutionalism. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane RO (1984) After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MH (2011) India’s evolving political settlement and the challenges of Sustaining development. Department of Economics, SOAS, University of London. November 2011. http://www.soas.ac.uk/staff/staff31246.php (accessed August 1, 2013)

  • Krasner SD (1991) Global communications and national power: life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics (Routledge):336–366

  • Kroh M (2008) The preadult origins of post-materialism: A longitudinal sibling study. Working paper. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran T (1995) Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran T (2011) The long divergence: How islamic law held back the middle east. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran T, Sunsteain CR (1999) Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Review:683–768

  • McNeil JR (2008) Can history help with global warming. In: Campbell KM (ed) Climate cataclysm: The foreign policy and national security implications of climate change. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, pp 26–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn R (2011) The impact of climate change on land. In: Ingram GK, Hong Y-H (eds) Climate change and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, pp 62–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J (2004) The gifts of athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery WD (2011) Commentary. In: Ingram GK, Hong Y-H (eds) Climate change and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, pp 84–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Lempert RJ, Janetos AC (2013) A framework for the development of new socio-economic scenarios for climate change research. Climatic change, Forthcoming Special Issue

  • Nelson RR (2004) The market economy, and the scientific commons. Res Policy 33:455–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1977) In search of useful theory of innovation. Res Policy 6(1):36–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990a) A transaction cost theory of politics. J Theor Polit:355–367

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990b) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1999) Institutions and credible commitment. SSRN. September 2, 1999. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6042 (accessed July 31, 2013)

  • North DC (2005) Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC, Wallis JJ, Weingast BR (2009) Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North DC, John Joseph W, Webb SB, Weingast BR (2013) Lessons in the shadow of violence. In: North DC, Webb SB, Weingast BR (eds) In the shadow of violence: Politics, economics, and the problems of development. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 328–350

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1981) Structure and change in economic history. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill BC et al (2013) A new scenario famework for climate change research: the concept of shared socio-economic pathways. Climatic change, Forthcoming Special Issue

  • O’Neill BC et al (2012) Meeting Report of the workshop on the nature and use of new socioeconomic pathways for climate change research, Boulder, CO, November 2–4, 2011. Workshop report, Boulder: National Center for Atmospheric Research

  • Olson M (1996) Distinguished lecture on economics in government: Big bills left on the sidewalk: why some nations are rich, and others poor. J Econ Perspect 10(2):3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Pei M (2006) China’s Trapped transition: The limits of developmental autocracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P (2004) Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Weingast BR (1997) Federalism as a commitment to preserving markets. J Econ Perspect 11(4):83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N (1994) Exploring the black box: Technology, economics, and history. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N, Birdsell LE Jr (1986) How the west grew rich: The economic transformation of the industrial world. Basic Books, inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (2012) The implications of a break-up of china for carbon dioxide emissions. Working Paper, University of Sussex: Economics, Management & Economics

  • Tsebelis G (1995) Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, pariamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. Br J Polit Sci 25(3):289–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast BR (2010) Why do developing countries prove so resistant to the rule of law. In: Heckman JJ, Nelson RL, Cabatagan L (eds) Global perspectives on the rule of law. Taylor, and Francis Group, Routledge, pp 29–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (2000) The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. J Econ Lit 38(3):595–613

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hudson Institute, Washington, DC, USA

    Lee Lane

  2. NERA Economic Consulting, Washington, DC

    W. David Montgomery

Authors
  1. Lee Lane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. David Montgomery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee Lane.

Additional information

This article is part of the Special Issue on “A Framework for the Development of New Socio-economic Scenarios for Climate Change Research” edited by Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Robert Lempert, and Anthony Janetos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lane, L., Montgomery, W.D. An institutional critique of new climate scenarios. Climatic Change 122, 447–458 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0919-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0919-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation