Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrating climate change into peacebuilding

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peacebuilding countries are concentrated in areas of heightened vulnerability to climate change impacts, and almost certainly lack the capacity to manage these impacts. In spite of this overlap, climate change adaptation and mitigation projects are typically excluded from peacebuilding activities. This is particularly alarming given that many analysts believe climate change will trigger, amplify or perpetuate humanitarian crises, population displacement, political extremism and violent conflict in the regions in which most peacebuilding operations take place. This paper investigates opportunities for integrating climate change into peacebuilding. It identifies three obstacles to this integration—the lack of climate change tools and policies that can be easily introduced into typical peacebuilding programming; the skepticism and complacency of the donor community; and tensions between the objectives and timeframes of peacebuilding and those of climate change response. The paper then examines opportunities to integrate climate change into four principal programmatic areas of peacebuilding—socio-economic recovery, politics and governance, security and rule of law, and human rights—and concludes that more attention needs to be given to these opportunities in order to build resilience and reduce the likelihood of more daunting and costly challenges in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Statements about practitioner views throughout this article are based on data collected through direct field observation when the author was a participant-observer on peacebuilding missions in Rwanda and Sierra Leone. This data was gathered on a not for attribution basis.

  2. REDD, which originated in 2005, seeks to protect forests. Since that time, elaborations have evolved: REDD+ in 2007 focused on ensuring that local communities and indigenous people were not hurt by sustainable forest management and conservation practices; in 2009 REDD++ emerged to protect low carbon, high biodiversity lands from being transformed into agricultural lands because of REDD protecting other areas from conversion.

References

  • Barnett M, Kim H, O’Donnell M, Sitea L (2007) Peacebuilding: what is in a name? Glob Gov 13(1):35–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendaña A (2005) From peacebuilding to statebuilding: one step forward and two steps back? Development 48(3):5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjaminsen TA, Alinon K, Buhaug H, Buseth JT (2012) Does climate change drive land-use conflicts in the Sahel? J Peace Res 49:97–111. doi:10.1177/0022343311427343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdal M (2009) Building peace after war. International Institute for Strategic Studies, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Call C, Cousens (2008) Ending wars and building peace: international responses to War-Torn Societies. Int Stud Perspect 9:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetail V (ed) (2009) Post-conflict peacebuilding: a lexicon. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler D (1999) Bosnia: faking democracy after Dayton. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra J (2000) The UN’s Kingdom in East Timor. Survival 42(3):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Coning C (2008) Understanding peacebuilding: consolidating the peace process. Confl Trends 4:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle M, Sambanis N (2006) Making war and building peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyal T, Liberman L, Trope Y (2008) Judging near and distant virtue and vice. J Exp Soc Psychol 44:1204–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd R, Matthew R (eds) (2012) Environmental security: frameworks for analysis. Routledge, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortna V (2008) Does peacekeeping work? Shaping belligerents’ choices after civil war. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita K, Henderson M, Eng J, Trope Y, Liberman N (2005) Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychol Sci 17:278–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartzke E (2012) Could climate change precipitate peace? J Peace Res 49:177–192. doi:10.1177/0022343311427342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German Advisory Council on Global Change (2008) World in transition: climate change as a security risk. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Germanwatch (2011) The Climate Change Performance Index: results 2012. http://germanwatch.org/klima/ccpi.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2012

  • Hammill A, Matthew R (2012) Peacebuilding and climate change adaptation. In: Jensen D, Lonergan S (eds) Assessing and restoring natural resources in post-conflict peacebuilding. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard L (2008) UN peacekeeping in civil wars. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: understanding, controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Working Group II Report: climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability http://www.ipcc.ch/ Accessed 15 March 2012

  • Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. J Personal Soc Psychol 75:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg B (2001) The skeptical environmentalist: measuring the real state of the world Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthew R, Barnett J, McDonald B, O’Brien K (eds) (2009) Global environmental change and human security. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy M, Baker DJ (October 2012) Climate extremes: recent trends with implications for national security. http://environment.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/climate_extremes_report_2012-12-04.pdf Accessed 15 February 2013

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2007) Effective engagement in fragile states http://www.oecd.org/document/12/0,3746,en_2649_33693550_42113676_1_1_1_1,00.html Accessed on 15 March 2012

  • Peacebuilding Initiative. http://www.peacebuildinginitiative.org/index.cfm?pageId=1764

  • Pugh M (2008) Corruption and the political economy of liberal peace. International Studies Association annual convention paper. San Francisco

  • Siemens and McGraw Hill Construction (2009) Greening of Corporate America

  • Smith D (2004) Towards a strategic framework for peacebuilding: getting their act together: overview report of the joint Utstein study of peacebuilding. http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/kilde/ud/rap/2004/0044/ddd/pdfv/210673-rapp104.pdf Accessed 10 March 2012

  • Smith D, Vivekananda J (2007) A climate of conflict: the links between climate change, peace and war. London: International Alert. http://www.international-alert.org/pdf/A_Climate_Of_Conflict.pdf Accessed 8 March 2012

  • Slettebak RT (2012) Don’t blame the weather! Climate-related natural disasters and civil conflict. J Peace Res 49:163–176. doi:10.1177/0022343311425693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov A, Goren A, Trope Y (2007) Probability as a psychological distance: construal and preferences. J Exp Soc Psychol 43:473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschirgi N (2004) Post-conflict peacebuilding revisited: achievements, limitations, challenges. International Peace Academy, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2001) ‘No exit without strategy’, Report of the Secretary-General, S/2001/394, 20 Aprtil 2001, New York: United Nations

  • United Nations (2006) Note of guidance on integrated missions, revised, 17 January 2006, New York: United Nations

  • United Nations (2013) Financing peacekeeping. http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/operations/financing.shtml Accessed May 13, 2013

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (1997) Capacity development, Technical Advisory Paper 2 http://mirror.undp.org/magnet/cdrb/TECHPAP2.htm. Accessed on 15 March 2012

  • UNDP (1994) Human development report 1994. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2009) From conflict to peacebuilding: the role of natural resources and the environment. UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly (2009) Report of the Secretary-General on peacebuilding in the immediate aftermath of conflict, 11 June 2009, A/63/881-S/2009/304

  • United Nations Secretary General (UNSG) (1992) An agenda for peace: preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping http://www.un.org/Docs/SG/agpeace.html Accessed on 15 March 2012

  • Welzer H (2012) Climate wars: why people will be killed in the 21st century. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Matthew.

Additional information

This article is part of a Special Issue on “Climate and Security: Evidence, Emerging Risks, and a New Agenda” edited by François Gemenne, Neil Adger, Jon Barnett, and Geoff Dabelko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthew, R. Integrating climate change into peacebuilding. Climatic Change 123, 83–93 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0894-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0894-1

Keywords

Navigation