Climatic Change

, Volume 121, Issue 1, pp 41–53 | Cite as

Vulnerability of the oil and gas sector to climate change and extreme weather events

Article

Abstract

A changing climate and more frequent extreme weather events pose challenges to the oil and gas sector. Identifying how these changes will affect oil and gas extraction, transportation, processing, and delivery, and how these industries can adapt to or mitigate any adverse impacts will be vital to this sector’s supply security. This work presents an overview of the sector’s vulnerability to a changing climate. It addresses the potential for Natech hazards and proposes risk reduction measures, including mitigation and adaptation options. Assessment frameworks to ensure the safety of people, the environment, and investments in the oil and gas sector in the face of climate change are presented and their limitations discussed. It is argued that a comprehensive and systemic analysis framework for risk assessment is needed. The paper concludes that climate change and extreme weather events represent a real physical threat to the oil and gas sector, particularly in low-lying coastal areas and areas exposed to extreme weather events. The sector needs to take climate change seriously, assess its own vulnerability, and take appropriate measures to prevent or mitigate any potentially negative effects.

References

  1. ACIA (2004) Impacts of a Warming Arctic – Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonioni G, Bonvicini S, Spadoni G, Cozzani V (2009) Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events. Reliab Eng Saf Sys 94(9):1442–1450. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2009.02.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ARIA (2010) Analyse, Recherche, et Information sur les Accidents (ARIA). ARIA Chemical accident database, French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development. http://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr. Accessed 10 May 2010
  4. Baskin B (2006) A year after Katrina, US Gulf drillers rein in rogue rigs. Dow Jones Newswires. http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=35708. Accessed 9 April 2013
  5. Bouquegneau C (2007) Lightning Protection of Oil and Gas Industrial Plants. IX International Symposium on Lightning Protection, 26–30 November, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil. Available at: http://igs.nigc.ir/STANDS/BOOK/LIGHTNING-PROTECTION-A.PDF. Accessed 30 May 2013
  6. Brosnan G, Otis J (2007) Floods spare oil fields, not oil workers. Houston Chronicle. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/5279858.html. Accessed 9 April 2013
  7. Bushell C (2007) Coffeyville, Kansas Disaster. eHam. http://www.eham.net/articles/17220. Accessed 9 April 2013
  8. Businessweek (2011) Ohio gas prices jump in wake of Hurricane Irene. BusinessWeek. http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9PBRTAG0.htm. Accessed 9 April 2013
  9. Chang JI, Lin CC (2006) A study of storage tank accidents. J Loss Prev Process Ind 19(1):51–59. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cozzani V, Campedel M, Renni E, Krausmann E (2010) Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: Analysis of past accidents. J Haz Mater 175:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cruz AM, Krausmann E (2008) Damage to offshore oil and gas facilities following hurricanes Katrina and Rita: an overview. J Loss Prev Process Ind 21(6):620–626. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2008.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cruz AM, Krausmann E (2009) Hazardous-materials releases from offshore oil and gas facilities and emergency response following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22(1):59–65. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2008.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cruz AM, Okada N (2008) Consideration of natural hazards in the design and risk management of industrial facilities. Nat Haz 44(2):213–227. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9118-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cruz AM, Steinberg LJ, Luna R (2001) Identifying hurricane-induced hazardous materials release scenarios in a petroleum refinery. Nat Haz Rev 2(4):203–210. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2001)2:4(203) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cruz AM, Steinberg LJ, Vetere-Arellano AL (2006) Emerging issues for natech disaster risk management in Europe. J Risk Res 9(5):483–501. doi:10.1080/13669870600717657 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Energo Engineering (2007) Assessment of fixed offshore platform performance in hurricanes Katrina and Rita, Final report. Energo Engineering. http://www.energoeng.com/Documents/MMS%20Project%20_578%20-%20Final%20Report.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2013
  17. Fletcher S (2006) OTC: experts see “new era” of hurricane activity. Oil Gas J 104(19):22–25Google Scholar
  18. Gillam C (2007). Kansas hit with oil spill, flooding. Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/07/02/us-refinery-coffeyville-idUSN0234050120070702. Accessed 11 April 2013
  19. Glöckler O (2010) Effects of extreme weather on nuclear power plants. Presented at the Joint ICTP/IAEA Workshop on Vulnerability of Energy Systems to Climate Changes and Extreme Events, April 19–23 2010, ICTP, Trieste, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  20. Godoy LA (2007) Performance of storage tanks in oil facilities damaged by hurricanes Katrina and Rita. J Perform Constr Facil 21(6):441–449. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:6(441) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goethals M, Borgonjon I, Wood M (2008) Necessary measures for preventing major accidents at petroleum storage depots: Key points and conclusions, Seveso Inspections Series, Vol. 1, EUR 22804 EN. European Commission, Ispra; Federal Public Service Employment, Labour and Social Dialogue, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinrichs CS (2005) Apache Corporation: Hurricane Ivan Overview. Hurricane Readiness and Recovery Conference, 26–27 July 2005, Houston, Texas. Available at: Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, http://www.bsee.gov/Research-and-Training/Technology-Assessment-and-Research/tarprojects/500-599/559/559AE3.aspx. Accessed 12 April 2013
  23. ILIT (Independent Levee Investigation Team) (2006) Investigation of the Performance of the New Orleans Flood Protection Systems in Hurricane Katrina on August 29, 2005. University of California at Berkley. http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/projects/neworleans/report/intro&summary.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2013
  24. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Kessler J (2012) Sandy ruptures tank, causing diesel spill in New Jersey. CNN. http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/31/us/new-jersey-sandy-spill. Accessed 12 April 2013
  26. Kinsman P, Lewis J (2000) Report on a study of international pipeline accidents. Contract research report 294/2000. HSE Books, Norwich, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  27. Krausmann E, Baranzini D (2012) Natech risk reduction in the European Union. J Risk Res 15(8):1027–1047. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.666761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krausmann E, Mushtaq F (2008) A qualitative Natech damage scale for the impact of floods on selected industrial facilities. Nat Haz 46(2):179–197. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9203-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krausmann E, Renni E, Campedel M, Cozzani V (2011) Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis. Nat Haz 59(1):285–300. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9754-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyon C (2011) Drought harming buildings, pipes in Austin: Building managers see cracks, busted pipes and failing equipment. Austin Business Journal. http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/print-edition/2011/08/19/drought-harming-buildings-pipes-in-aus.html. Accessed 12 April 2013
  31. Mabey N, Mitchell J (2010) Investing for an Uncertain Future: Priorities for UK Energy and Climate Security. Chatham House. http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Europe/bp0710_mitchellmabey.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2013
  32. Marsh Risk Consulting (2003) The 100 largest losses 1972–2001: Large property damage losses in the hydrocarbon-chemical industries, 20th Edition. The Equity Engineering Group. http://www.equityeng.com/sites/default/files/reports/M&M-article_452602.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2013
  33. MMS (2006) MMS updates hurricanes Katrina and Rita damage, US Minerals Management Service, News Release 3486. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. http://www.boem.gov/boem-newsroom/press-releases/2006/press0501.aspx. Accessed 12 April 2013
  34. NCADAC (2013) Federal Advisory Committee Draft Climate Assessment Report. U.S. Global Change Research Program. http://ncadac.globalchange.gov. Accessed 12 April 2013
  35. NTSB (1996) Pipeline Special Investigation Report: Evaluation of Pipeline Failures during Flooding and of Spill Response Actions, San Jacinto River near Houston, Texas, October 1994 (PB96-917004, NTSB/SIR-96/04). National Transportation Safety Board. http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/safetystudies/sir9604.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2013
  36. Paskal C (2009) Briefing paper: The vulnerability of Energy Infrastructure to Environmental Change (EERG BP 2009/01). Chatham House, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Rasmussen K (1995) Natural events and accidents with hazardous materials. J Hazard Mater 40(1):43–54. doi:10.1016/0304-3894(94)00079-V CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Renni E, Krausmann E, Cozzani V (2010) Industrial accidents triggered by lightning. J Hazard Mater 184(1–3):42–48. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.118 Google Scholar
  39. Savonis MJ, Burkett VR, Potter JR (2008) Impacts of Climate Change and Variability on Transportation Systems and Infrastructure: Gulf Coast Study, Phase I. U.S. Climate Change Science Program. http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap4-7/final-report/sap4-7-final-all.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2013
  40. Sengul H, Santella N, Steinberg LJ, Cruz AM (2012) Analysis of hazardous material releases due to natural hazards in the United States. Disasters 36(4):723–743. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01272.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Steinberg LJ, Sengul H, Cruz AM (2008) Natech risk and management: an assessment of the state of the art. Nat Haz 46(2):143–152. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9205-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tanos AE (1981) Meredosia Oil Terminal - the Illinois River floods a tank farm. Int Oil Spill Conf Proc 1981(1):243–247. doi:10.7901/2169-3358-1981-1-243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. US EPA (1997) Lightning hazard to facilities handling flammable substances (EPA 550-F-97-002c). Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/osweroe1/docs/chem/lit-flam.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2013
  44. Van der Meer JW, Cooper C, Warner MJ, Adams-Morales H, Steendam GJ (2008) The success of the hurricane protection around Chevron’s refinery at Pascagoula, MS, during Katrina. In PIANC USA Gulf Coast Hurricane Preparedness, Response, Recovery & Rebuilding Conference, 11–14 November 2008, Mobile, Alabama. Available at: http://www.vandermeerconsulting.nl/downloads/risk_assessment/2008_vandermeer_cooper.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2013
  45. Wilbanks TJ, Bhatt V, Bilello DE, Bull SR, Ekmann J et al. (2007) Effects of Climate Change on Energy Production and Use in the United States. U.S. Climate Change Science Program. http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap4-5/final-report/sap4-5-final-all.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2013

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GCOE, Disaster Prevention Research InstituteKyoto UniversityUjiJapan
  2. 2.European Commission, Joint Research CentreInstitute for the Protection and Security of the CitizenIspraItaly

Personalised recommendations