Abstract
In addition to lower carbon dioxide emissions, policies to reduce fossil fuel combustion can yield substantial air quality co-benefits via reduced emissions of co-pollutants such as particulate matter and air toxics. If co-pollutant intensity (the ratio of co-pollutant impacts to carbon dioxide emissions) varies across pollution sources, efficient policy design would seek greater emissions reductions where co-benefits are higher. The distribution of co-benefits also raises issues of environmental equity. This paper presents evidence on intersectoral, intrasectoral and spatial variations in co-pollutant intensity of industrial point sources in the United States, and discusses options for integrating co-benefits into climate policy design to advance efficiency and equity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexeeff G, Faust J, August LM, Milanes C, Randles K, Zeise L (2010) Cumulative impacts: building a scientific foundation. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, State of California. http://oehha.ca.gov/ej/pdf/CIReport123110.pdf
Ash M, Boyce JK (2011) Measuring corporate environmental justice performance. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18(2):61–79
Ash M et al (2009) Justice in the air: tracking toxic pollution from America’s industries to our states, cities, and neighborhoods. Los Angeles: Program for Environmental and Regional Equity; Amherst, MA: Political Economy Research Institute. http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/dpe/ctip/justice_in_the_air.pdf
Bell ML et al (2008) Ancillary human health benefits of improved air quality resulting from climate change mitigation. Environ Heal 7:41
Berk MM et al (2006) Sustainable energy: trade-offs and synergies between energy security, competitiveness, and environment. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven
Berry LM (2008) Inequality in the creation of environmental harm: looking for answers from within. In: Wilkinson RC, Freudenburg WR (eds) Equity and the environment, research in social problems and public policy, vol 15. Emerald Group, Bingley, pp 239–265
Boyce JK, Pastor M (2012) Cooling the planet, clearing the air: climate policy, carbon pricing, and co-benefits. Economics for Environment and Equity Network, Portland, September. http://www.e3network.org/papers/Cooling_the_Planet_Sept2012.pdf
Burtraw D (1996) The SO2 emissions trading program: cost savings without allowance trades. Contemp Econ Policy 14:79–94
California Air Resources Board (2011) Adaptive management plan for the cap-and-trade regulation. October 10. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/adaptive_management/plan.pdf
Carlson C, Burtraw D, Cropper M, Palmer KL (2000) Sulfur dioxide control by electric utilities: what are the gains from trade? J Polit Econ 108(6):1292–1326
Credit Suisse (2010) Growth from subtraction: impact of EPA rules on power markets. September 23. http://op.bna.com/env.nsf/id/jstn-8actja/$File/suisse.pdf
Dorman P (1996) Markets and mortality: economics, dangerous work, and the value of human life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Farber DA (2012) Pollution markets and social equity: analyzing the fairness of cap and trade. Ecol Law Q 39:1–56
Freudenberg WR (2006) Environmental degradation, disproportionality, and the double diversion. Rural Sociol 71(1):3–23
Gangadharan L (2004) Analysis of prices in tradable emission markets: an empirical study of the regional clean air incentives market in Los Angeles. Appl Econ 36:1569–1582
Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, U.S. Government (2010) Technical support document: social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under Executive Order 12866. Washington, DC. February. www.epa.gov/oms/climate/regulations/scc-tsd.pdf
Karner AA, Eisinger DS, Niemeier DA (2010) Near-roadway air quality: synthesizing the findings from real-world data. Environ Sci Technol 44(14):5334–5344
Landrigan PJ (2012) The hidden costs of environmental contamination. Eur Respir J 40:286–288
McCarthy JE, Parker L, Meltz R (2010) After the CAIR decision: multipollutant approaches to controlling powerplant emissions. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, March 4
Mohai P (2008) Equity and the environmental justice debate. In: Wilkinson RC, Freudenberg WR (eds) Equity and the environment, research in social problems and public policy, vol 15. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 21–50
Mohai P, Saha R (2006) Reassessing racial and socioeconomic disparities in environmental justice research. Demography 43(2):383–399
Morello-Frosch R, Zuk M, Jerrett M, Shamasunder B, Kyle AD (2011) Understanding the cumulative impacts of inequalities in environmental health: implications for policy. Heal Aff 30(5):879–887
Muller NZ (2012) The design of optimal climate policy with air pollution co-benefits. Resour Energy Econ 34(4):696–722
Muller NZ, Mendelsohn R (2009) Efficient pollution regulation: getting the prices right. Am Econ Rev 99(5):1714–1739
Muller NZ, Mendelsohn R, Nordhaus W (2011) Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. Am Econ Rev 101(5):1649–1675
Napolitano S, LaCount M, Risley D (2009) A multi-pollutant strategy. Public Util Fortn 147(1):34–41. January
National Academy of Sciences (2004) Air quality management in the United States. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
National Academy of Sciences (2009) Hidden costs of energy: unpriced consequences of energy production and use. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Nemet GF, Holloway T, Meier P (2010) Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environ Res Lett 5(1):014007
Pastor M (2003) Building social capital to protect natural capital: the quest for environmental justice. In: Boyce JK, Shelley BG (eds) Natural assets: democratizing environmental ownership. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 77–97
Pastor M, Morello-Frosch R, Sadd J, Scoggins J (2010) Minding the climate gap: what’s at stake if California’s climate law isn’t done right and right away. USC Program for Environmental & Regional Equity, Los Angeles
Pastor M, Morello-Frosch R, Sadd J, Scoggins J (2013) Risky business: cap-and-trade, public health, and environmental justice. In: Boone CG, Fragkias M (eds) Urbanization and sustainability. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 75–94
Prasad S, Carmichael T (2008) AB32 community benefit fund to reduce cumulative and disproportionate impacts. Coalition for Clean Air, Sacramento, March
Ringquist EJ (2005) Assessing evidence of environmental inequities: a meta-analysis. J Policy Anal Manag 24(2):223–247
Ruggles SJ et al (2011) Integrated public use microdata series: version 5.0 [machine-readable database]. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Sadd JL, Pastor M, Morello-Frosch R, Scoggins J, Jesdale B (2011) Playing it safe: assessing cumulative impact and social vulnerability through an environmental justice screening method in the South Coast Air Basin, California. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:1441–1459
Schatzki T, Stavins RN (2009) Addressing environmental justice concerns in the design of California’s climate policy. http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/eaac/comments/2009-11-03_Schatzki_and_Stavins_attachment.pdf
Szasz A, Meuser M (1997) Environmental inequalities: literature review and proposals for new directions in research and theory. Curr Sociol 45(3):99–120
Tietenberg T (1995) Tradable permits for pollution control when emission location matters: what have we learned? Environ Resour Econ 5:95–113
Viscusi WK, Aldy JE (2003) The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J Risk Uncertain 27:5–76
Acknowledgments
Research for this paper was supported by the Economics for Equity and Environment (E3) Network and by National Science Foundation Grant No. SES-1060904 and National Science Foundation Grant No. SES-1060882. The authors are grateful to Alice Kaswan, Rachel Morello-Frosch, Nicholas Muller, and David Adelman for helpful comments, and to Justin Scoggins, Owen Thompson, Mirabai Auer, and Alexis Doyle for research assistance. We are also grateful to three anonymous referees for helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boyce, J.K., Pastor, M. Clearing the air: incorporating air quality and environmental justice into climate policy. Climatic Change 120, 801–814 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0832-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0832-2