Skip to main content

A problematic social science approach to the study of climate science

The Original Article was published on 06 March 2013

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. For a critique of such “subjectivism” see Roll-Hansen 1998.

  2. See also Sarewitz 2004.

References

  • Jasanoff S (2004) The idiom of co-production. In: Jasanoff (ed) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Taylor & Francis, Inc, London, pp 1–12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lahsen M (2013) Climategate: the role of the social sciences. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0711-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen N (1998) Studying natural science without nature? Reflections on the realism of so-called laboratory studies. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 29:165–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 7:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D (2010) Curing climate backlash. Nature 264:28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Roll-Hansen.

Additional information

This comment refers to the article available at doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0711-x

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roll-Hansen, N. A problematic social science approach to the study of climate science. Climatic Change 119, 561–563 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0778-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0778-4

Keywords

  • Climate Policy
  • Climate Science
  • Logical Empiricist
  • Reliable Knowledge
  • Warming Demand