Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 118, Issue 3–4, pp 501–504 | Cite as

The trouble with deficits

Commentary on: “Misperceptions of climate-change risk as barriers to climate-change adaptation: a case study from the Rewa Delta, Fiji,” Lata and Nunn (2012)
  • Elizabeth F. Hall
  • Todd SandersEmail author
Article

In their recent paper, “Misperceptions of climate-change risk as barriers to climate-change adaptation: a case study from the Rewa Delta, Fiji,” Lata and Nunn (2012) argue that “lack of awareness” and “cultural impediments … such as short-term planning perspectives, spiritual beliefs, traditional governance structures” are barriers to climate change adaptation in Fiji’s Rewa Delta (p. 169). Understanding how vulnerable, often marginalized people can or will adapt to the future effects of climate change is a core concern of human dimensions of climate change scholars and the policy community more broadly. We thus feel obliged to point out that this paper has substantial methodological and conceptual shortcomings. These shortcomings seriously undermine the authors’ conclusion that public deficits,1 in their many manifestations in this paper, are barriers to climate change adaptation in the Rewa Delta.

We begin with the methodological shortcomings by asking: Of whom can the authors...

Keywords

Tropical Cyclone Climate Change Adaptation Climate Risk Climate Change Risk Adaptive Action 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barnett J, Campbell J (2010) Climate change and small island states: power, knowledge, and the South Pacific. Earthscan, London, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Forbes BC, Stammler F (2009) Arctic climate change discourse: the contrasting politics of research agendas in the West and Russia. Polar Res 28:28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jasanoff S, Wynne B (1998) Science and decisionmaking. In: Rayner S, Malone EL (eds) Human choice and climate change, volume I: the societal framework. Battelle, Columbus, pp 1–87Google Scholar
  4. Krupnik I, Jolly D (eds) (2002) The earth is faster now: indigenous observations of Arctic environmental change. Arctic Research Consortium of the United States, FairbanksGoogle Scholar
  5. Krupnik I, Aporta C, Gearheard S, Laidler GJ (eds) (2010) SIKU: knowing our ice. Documenting Inuit sea-ice knowledge and use. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Kuper A (2005) The reinvention of primitive society: transformations of a myth. Routledge, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Laidler GJ, Ford JD, Gough WA, Ikummaq T, Gagnon AS, Kowal S, Qrunnut K, Irngaut C (2009) Travelling and hunting in a changing Arctic: assessing Inuit vulnerability to a sea ice change in Igloolik, Nunavut. Clim Chang 94:363–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lata S, Nunn P (2012) Misperceptions of climate-change risk as barriers to climate-change adaptation: a case study from the Rewa Delta, Fiji. Clim Chang 110:169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mearns LO (2010) The drama of uncertainty. Clim Chang 100:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nuttall M (2009) Living in a world of movement: human resilience to environmental instability in Greenland. In: Crate SA, Nuttall M (eds) Anthropology and climate change: from encounters to actions. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, pp 292–310Google Scholar
  11. Orlove B, Roncoli C, Kabugo M, Majugu A (2010) Indigenous climate knowledge in southern Uganda: the multiple components of a dynamic regional system. Clim Chang 100:243–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Parker WS (2010) Predicting weather and climate: uncertainty, ensembles and probability. Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 41:263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rudiak-Gould P (2012) Promiscuous corroboration and climate change translation: a case study from the Marshall Islands. Glob Environ Chang 22:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shackley S, Wynne B (1995) Integrating knowledges for climate change: pyramids, nets and uncertainties. Glob Environ Chang 5:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wenzel GW (2009) Canadian Inuit subsistence and ecological instability: if the climate changes, must the Inuit? Polar Res 28:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wynne B (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science—hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genet 9:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wynne B (2010) Strange weather, again: climate science as political art. Theory Cult Soc 27:289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wynne B, Shackley S (1994) Evironmental models: truth machines or social heuristics? Globe 21:6–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ethnography, Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Toronto ScarboroughScarboroughCanada
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations