Climatic Change

, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 321–337 | Cite as

Learning with practitioners: climate change adaptation priorities in a Canadian community

  • Ian M. Picketts
  • John Curry
  • Stephen J. Déry
  • Stewart J. Cohen
Article

Abstract

Adaptation is already a necessary response to climate change for northern communities. The City of Prince George, in British Columbia, Canada, has been adjusting to impacts for years and there is a high level of local awareness of climate change. The purpose of this study was to collaborate with City staff and other organizations to undertake action-oriented research with the goal of creating a local adaptation strategy. Steps taken toward this goal included: producing downscaled climate scenarios; facilitating a workshop with local practitioners to prioritize impacts; gathering public feedback regarding impacts; and triangulating sources of information to determine community adaptation priorities. Changes to forests and increased flooding are the top local adaptation priorities, and impacts related to transportation, severe weather and water supply are high priorities. Other impacts, such as health effects and agricultural changes, are also important but did not rank highly using a risk framework focused on negative physical effects. Local impacts, actions the City is undertaking to address them and suggestions for implementing adaptation measures are summarized. The process of creating an adaptation strategy has proven highly valuable in Prince George and has precipitated further engagement and action. Due to the low profile of adaptation and limited resources in many communities, researchers and practitioners must capitalize on opportunities to incorporate adaptation into existing plans and processes. Lessons from the Prince George experience can be applied to other communities as they strive to effectively adapt to climate change.

References

  1. Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79(4):387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza et al (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML et al (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 717–743Google Scholar
  3. Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M et al (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93:335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BCMOE (BC Ministry of the Environment) (2008) Mountain pine beetle infestation: hydrological impacts. EDI Environmental Dynamics. http://www.unbc.ca/assets/qrrc/mountain_pine_beetle__hydrological.pdf. Accessed 12 November 2010
  5. BCMOF (BC Ministry of Forests) (1998) The Ecology of the Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/docs/bro/bro53.pdf. Accessed 29 November 2009
  6. Berrang-Ford L, Ford JD, Paterson J (2011) Are we adapting to climate change? Glob Environ Change 21:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradbury-Huang H (2010) What is good action research? Why the resurgent interest? Action Res 8(1):93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burch S (2010) In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: an examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities. Energy Policy 38:7575–7585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casebeer AL, Verhoef M (1997) Combining qualitative and quantitative research methods: considering the possibilities for enhancing the study of chronic diseases. Chronic Dis Can 18(3):130–135Google Scholar
  10. City of Prince George (2005) City of Prince George water conservation plan. http://princegeorge.ca/cityservices/utilities/Documents/water_conservation_plan.pdf. Accessed 12 November 2010
  11. Cohen SJ (2010) From observer to extension agent – using research experiences to enable proactive response to climate change. Clim Change 100:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen S, Neilson D, Smith S et al (2006) Learning with local help: expanding the dialogue on climate change and water management in the Okanagan region, British Columbia, Canada. Clim Change 75:331–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coyne IT (1997) Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries. J Adv Nurs 26:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crabbe P, Robin M (2006) Institutional adaptation of water resource infrastructures to climate change in Eastern Ontario. Clim Change 78:103–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engle NL (2011) Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Glob Environ Change 21:647–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Field CB, Mortsch LD, Brklacich M et al (2007) North America. In: Parry ML et al (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 617–652Google Scholar
  17. Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Füssel HM (2007) Adapting planning for climate change; concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. BC Government (2010) Local health area 57 – Prince George statistical profile. BC Stats. http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/data/sep/lha/lha_57.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2011
  20. Hunt A, Watkiss P (2011) Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities: a review of the literature. Clim Change 104:13–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huq S, Kovats S, Reid H, Satterthwaite D (2007) Reducing risks to cities from disasters and climate change. Environ Urban 19:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Infrastructure Canada (2006) Adapting infrastructure to climate change in Canada’s cities and communities: a literature review. http://cbtadaptation.squarespace.com/storage/CdnInfrastructureAdaptation-LiteratureReview.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2011
  23. Jacques P (2006) Downscaling climate models and environmental policy: from global to regional politics. J Environ Plan Manag 29:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jick T (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24:602–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klein RJT, Huq S, Denton F et al (2007) Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation. In: Parry ML et al (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 745–777Google Scholar
  26. Kurz WA, Dymond CC, Stinson G et al (2008) Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452:987–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mills BN, Tighe SL, Andrey J, Smith JT, Huen K (2009) Climate change implications for flexible pavement design and performance in southern Canada. J Transp Eng 135:773–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan DL (1998) Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual Health Res 8:362–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moser SC, Elkstrom JA (2011) Taking ownership of climate change: participatory adaptation planning in two local case studies from California. J Environ Stud Sci 1:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. NHC (Northwest Hydraulic Consultants) (2009) City of Prince George flood risk evaluation and flood control solutions. Northwest Hydraulics Consultants, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  31. Parzen J (2008) Chicago area climate change quick guide: adapting to the physical impacts of climate change. City of Chicago. http://www.durham.ca/community/climate_change/reports/Chicago_Quick_Guide_to_Adaptation.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2009
  32. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  33. Picketts IM, Curry J (2011) Climate change adaptation in British Columbia communities: lessons for planners. Int J Sustain Soc 3(4):397–413Google Scholar
  34. Picketts IM, Werner AM, Murdock TQ (2009) Climate change in Prince George: summary of past trends and future projections. Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium. http://pacificclimate.org/sites/default/files/publications/Werner.ClimateChangePrinceGeorge.Aug2009.pdf. Accessed 31 November 2009
  35. Picketts IM, Werner AT, Murdock TQ et al (2012) Planning for climate change adaptation: lessons learned from a community-based workshop. Environ Sci Policy 17:82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pielke RA, Prins G, Rayner S, Sarewitz D (2007) Climate change 2007: lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 445:597–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Preston BL, Westaway RM, Yuen EJ (2011) Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitig Adap Strateg Glob Change 16:407–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Randall DA, Wood RA, Bony S et al (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. In: Solomon SD et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 589–662Google Scholar
  39. Reason P, Bradbury H (2006) Handbook of action research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Richardson GRA (2010) Adapting to climate change: an introduction for Canadian municipalities. Natural Resources Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  41. Riley M (2000) Policy and practice; a process for assessing the impact of climate change on new developments. J Environ Plan Manag 43:711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. SGOG (Smart Growth on the Ground) (2009). Downtown Prince George concept plan. http://www.reibc.org/_Library/Documents/SGOG_Downtown_Prince_George_CP_sept14_approved_web.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2011
  44. Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S et al (2009) Making local futures tangible – synthesizing and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Glob Environ Change 19:447–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Storbjörk S (2010) It takes more to get a ship to change course: barriers for organizational learning and local climate adaptation in Sweden. J Environ Policy Plan 12:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. UKCIP (United Kingdom Climate Impacts Programme) (2011) The UKCIP adaptation wizard v. 3.0. http://www.ukcip.org.uk/tools/. Accessed 21 January 2011
  48. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (2011) Assessing the costs and benefits of adaptation options: and overview of approaches. http://unfccc.int/files/adaptation/nairobi_work_programme/knowledge_resources_and_publications/application/pdf/2011_nwp_costs_benefits_adaptation.pdf. Accessed 20 December 2011
  49. van Aalst MK, Cannon T, Burton I (2008) Community level adaptation to climate change: the potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Glob Environ Change 18:165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker IJ, Sydneysmith R (2008) British Columbia. In: Lemmen D et al (eds) From impacts to adaptation: Canada in a changing climate. Government of Canada, Ottawa, pp 329–386Google Scholar
  51. Williamson TB, Colombo SJ, Duinker PN et al (2009) Climate change and Canada’s forests: from impacts to adaptation. Sustainable Forest Management Network and Natural Resources. Canada, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolf J (2011) Climate change adaptation as a social process. In: Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L (eds) Climate change adaptation in developed nations: from theory to practice. Springer, London, pp 21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian M. Picketts
    • 1
  • John Curry
    • 2
  • Stephen J. Déry
    • 3
  • Stewart J. Cohen
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Northern British Columbia (BC)Prince GeorgeCanada
  2. 2.School of Environmental PlanningUniversity of Northern BCPrince GeorgeCanada
  3. 3.Environmental Science and Engineering ProgramUniversity of Northern BCPrince GeorgeCanada
  4. 4.Adaptation and Impacts Research SectionEnvironment Canada, and University of BCVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations