Climatic Change

, Volume 115, Issue 3–4, pp 893–902 | Cite as

Toward a physically plausible upper bound of sea-level rise projections

  • Ryan L. Sriver
  • Nathan M. Urban
  • Roman Olson
  • Klaus Keller
Letter

Abstract

Anthropogenic sea-level rise (SLR) causes considerable risks. Designing a sound SLR risk-management strategy requires careful consideration of decision-relevant uncertainties such as the reasonable upper bound of future SLR. The recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Fourth Assessment reported a likely upper SLR bound in the year 2100 near 0.6 m (meter). More recent studies considering semi-empirical modeling approaches and kinematic constraints on glacial melting suggest a reasonable 2100 SLR upper bound of approximately 2 m. These recent studies have broken important new ground, but they largely neglect uncertainties surrounding thermal expansion (thermosteric SLR) and/or observational constraints on ocean heat uptake. Here we quantify the effects of key parametric uncertainties and observational constraints on thermosteric SLR projections using an Earth system model with a dynamic three-dimensional ocean, which provides a mechanistic representation of deep ocean processes and heat uptake. Considering these effects nearly doubles the contribution of thermosteric SLR compared to previous estimates and increases the reasonable upper bound of 2100 SLR projections by 0.25 m. As an illustrative example of the effect of overconfidence, we show how neglecting thermosteric uncertainty in projections of the SLR upper bound can considerably bias risk analysis and hence the design of adaptation strategies. For conditions close to the Port of Los Angeles, the 0.25 m increase in the reasonable upper bound can result in a flooding-risk increase by roughly three orders of magnitude. Results provide evidence that relatively minor underestimation of the upper bound of projected SLR can lead to major downward biases of future flooding risks.

References

  1. Alley RB, Joughin I (2012) Modeling Ice-Sheet Flow. Science 336(6081):551–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caldwell P (2010) Joint Archive for Sea Level: Research Quality Data. (University of Hawaii, Honolulu), http://uhslc.soest.hawaii.edu/jasl.html
  3. Domingues CM, Church JA, White NJ, Gleckler PJ, Wijffels SE, Barker PM, Dunn JR (2008) Improved estimates of upper-ocean warming and multi-decadal sea-level rise. Nature 453(7198):1090–1096Google Scholar
  4. Goes M, Urban NM, Tonkonojenkov R, Haran M, Schmittner A, Keller K (2010) What is the skill of ocean tracers in reducing uncertainties about ocean diapycnal mixing and projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation? J Geophys Res-Oceans. doi:10.1029/2010JC006407
  5. Hegerl GC, Zwiers FW, Braconnot P, Gillett NP, Luo Y, Marengo Orsini JA, Nicholls N, Penner JE, Stott PA (2007) Understanding and attributing climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Hunter J (2011) A simple technique for estimating an allowance for uncertain sea-level rise. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-10011-10332-10581
  7. IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacob T, Wahr J, Pfeffer WT, Swenson S (2012) Recent contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise. Nature 482(7386):514–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jevrejeva S, Moore JC, Grinsted A (2010) How will sea level respond to changes in natural and anthropogenic forcings by 2100? Geophys Res Lett. doi:10.1029/2010GL042947
  10. Knutti R, Hegerl GC (2008) The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth’s temperature to radiation changes. Nat Geosc 1(11):735–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knutti R, Stocker TF (2000) Influence of the thermohaline circulation on projected sea level rise. J Clim 13:1997–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knutti R, Stocker TF, Joos F, Plattner GK (2002) Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles. Nature 416(6882):719–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lempert R, Sriver RL, Keller K (2012) Characterizing Uncertain Sea Level Rise Projections to Support Infrastructure Investment Decisions. California Energy Commission, Publication Number: CEC-500-2012-056, http://www.energy.ca.gov/2012publications/CEC-500-2012-056/CEC-500-2012-056.pdf. In review at Global Environmental Change
  14. Lin N, Emanuel K, Oppenheimer M, Vanmarcke E (2012) Physically based assessment of hurricane surge threat under climate change. Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1389
  15. McDougall TJ, Jackett DR, Wright DG, Feistel R (2003) Accurate and computationally efficient algorithms for potential temperature and density of seawater. J Atmos Ocean Technol 20(5):730–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Milne GA, Gehrels WR, Hughes CW, Tamisiea ME (2009) Identifying the causes of sea-level change. Nat Geosci 2(7):471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moon T, Joughin I, Smith B, Howat I (2012) 21st-Century Evolution of Greenland Outlet Glacier Velocities. Science 336(6081):576–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFB, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith SJ, Stouffer RJ, Thomson AM, Weyant JP, Wilbanks TJ (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756Google Scholar
  20. National Academy of Sciences (2010) Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change. The National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Nicholls RJ, Marinova N, Lowe JA, Brown S, Vellinga P, De Gusmao D, Hinkel J, Tol RSJ (2011) Sea-level rise and its possible impacts given a ‘beyond 4 degrees C world’ in the twenty-first century. Phil Trans R Soc. doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0291
  22. Olson R, Sriver RL, Goes M, Urban NM, Matthews HD, Haran M, Keller K (2012) A climate sensitivity estimate using Bayesian fusion of instrumental observations and an Earth System model. J Geophys Res-Atm D04103. doi:04110.01029/02011JD016620
  23. Pfeffer WT, Harper JT, O’Neel S (2008) Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st-century sea-level rise. Science 321:1340–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Purvis MJ, Bates PD, Hayes CM (2008) A probabilistic methodology to estimate future coastal flood risk due to sea level rise. Coast Eng 55(12):1062–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Randall DA, Wood RA, Bony S, Colman R, Fichefet T, Fyfe J, Kattsov V, Pitman A, Shukla J, Srinivasan J, Stouffer RJ, Sumi A, Taylor KE (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Titus JG, Narayanan V (1995) The probability of sea level rise. United States Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  27. Tol RSJ, Bohn M, Downing TE, Guillerminet M-L, Hizsnyik E, Kasperson R, Lonsdale K, Mays C, Nicholls RJ, Olsthoorn AA, Pfeifle G, Poumadere M, Toth FL, Nafeidis AT, Van Der Werrf PE, Yetkiner IH (2006) Adaptation to five metres of sea level rise. J Risk Res 9(5):467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van Dantzig D (1956) Economic decision problems for flood prevention. Econometrica 24(3):276–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vellinga P, Katsman C, Sterl A, Beersma J, Hazeleger W, Church J, Kopp R, Kroon D, Oppenheimer M, Plag H-P, Rahmstor S, Lowe J, Ridley J, von Storch H, Vaughan D, van de Wal R, Weisse R, Kwadijk J, Lammersen R, Marinova N (2009) Exploring high-end climate change scenarios for flood protection of the Netherlands, http://www.knmi.nl/bibliotheek/knmipubWR/WR2009-05.pdf
  30. Vermeer M, Rahmstorf S (2009) Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(51):21527–21532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wanninkhof R (1992) Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean. J Geophys Res 97:7373–7382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weaver AJ et al (2001) The UVic Earth System Climate Model: Model description, climatology, and applications to past, present and future climates. Atmosphere-Ocean 39(4):361–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Willis JK, Church JA (2012) Regional Sea-Level Projection. Science 336(6081):550–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yin JJ, Schlesinger ME, Stouffer RJ (2009) Model projections of rapid sea-level rise on the northeast coast of the United States. Nat Geosci 2(4):262–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yohe G, Neumann J, Marshall P, Ameden H (1996) The economic cost of greenhouse-induced sea-level rise for developed property in the United States. Clim Change 32:387–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan L. Sriver
    • 1
  • Nathan M. Urban
    • 2
  • Roman Olson
    • 3
  • Klaus Keller
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Energy Security CenterLos Alamos National LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeosciencesThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  4. 4.Earth and Environmental Systems InstituteThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations