Abstract
This paper compares the results of the three state of the art climate-energy-economy models IMACLIM-R, ReMIND-R, and WITCH to assess the costs of climate change mitigation in scenarios in which the implementation of a global climate agreement is delayed or major emitters decide to participate in the agreement at a later stage only. We find that for stabilizing atmospheric GHG concentrations at 450 ppm CO2-only, postponing a global agreement to 2020 raises global mitigation costs by at least about half and a delay to 2030 renders ambitious climate targets infeasible to achieve. In the standard policy scenario—in which allocation of emission permits is aimed at equal per-capita levels in the year 2050—regions with above average emissions (such as the EU and the US alongside the rest of Annex-I countries) incur lower mitigation costs by taking early action, even if mitigation efforts in the rest of the world experience a delay. However, regions with low per-capita emissions which are net exporters of emission permits (such as India) can possibly benefit from higher future carbon prices resulting from a delay. We illustrate the economic mechanism behind these observations and analyze how (1) lock-in of carbon intensive infrastructure, (2) differences in global carbon prices, and (3) changes in reduction commitments resulting from delayed action influence mitigation costs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beccherle J, Tirole J (2010) Regional initiatives and the cost of delaying binding climate change agreements, mimeo
Bosetti V, Carraro C, Galeotti M, Massetti E, Tavoni M (2006) A world induced technical change hybrid model. Energy J 27(Special Issue 2):13–38
Bosetti V, Carraro C, Galeotti M, Massetti E, Tavoni M (2007) The WITCH model: structure, baseline and solution. FEEM Working Paper N. 10.2007, Milan
Bosetti V, Carraro C, Sgobbi A, Tavoni M (2009) Delayed action and uncertain targets. How much will climate policy cost? Clim Change 96:299–312
Clarke L, Edmonds J, Krey V, Richels R, Rose S, Tavoni M (2009) International climate policy architectures: overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios. Energy Econ 31(Supplement 2):S64–S81
Davis SJ, Caldeira K, Matthews HD (2010) Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Science 10(5997):1330–1333
Edenhofer O, Carraro C, Koehler J, Grubb M (eds) (2006) Endogenous technological change and the economics of atmospheric stabilisation. A special issue of the energy journal, vol 27
Edmonds J, Clarke L, Lurz J, Wise M (2008) Stabilizing CO2 concentrations with incomplete international cooperation. Climate Policy 8:355–376
Fisher BS, Nakicenovic N, Alfsen K, Corfee Morlot J, de la Chesnaye F, Hourcade J-C, Jiang K, Kainuma M, La Rovere E, Matysek A, Rana A, Riahi K, Richels R, Rose S, van Vuuren D, Warren R (2007) Issues related to mitigation in the long term context. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Flachsland C, Marschinski R, Edenhofer O (2009) Global trading versus linking. Architectures for international emissions trading. Energy Policy 37:1637–1647
Ha-Duong M, Grubb MJ, Hourcade J-C (1997) Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement. Nature 390(6657):270–273
Harstad B (2009) The dynamics of climate agreements. Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements Discussion Paper 09-28
Jakob M, Bosetti V, Waisman H, De Cian E, Steckel J, Leimbach M, Baumstark L (2009a) The RECIPE reference scenarios. RECIPE Backgound Paper. http://www.pik-potsdam.de/members/jakob/publications/recipe-baseline-scenarios
Jakob M, Waisman H, Bosetti V, De Cian E, Leimbach M, Baumstark L, Luderer G (2009b) Description of the RECIPE models. RECIPE Backgound Paper. http://www.pik-potsdam.de/members/jakob/publications/recipe-model-descriptions
Keppo I, Rao S (2007) International climate regimes: effects of delayed participation. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74(7):962–979
Knopf B, Edenhofer O, Flachsland C, Kok MTJ, Lotze-Campen H, Luderer G, Popp A, van Vuuren DP (2010) Managing the low-carbon transition – from model results to policies. Energ J 31(Special Issue 1):223–245
Leimbach M, Bauer N, Baumstark L, Edenhofer O (2009) Mitigation costs in a globalized world: climate policy analysis with ReMIND-R. Environ Model Assess 15:155–173
Luderer G, Bosetti V, Jakob M, Leimbach M, Steckel J, Waisman H, Edenhofer O (2011a) The economics of decarbonizing the energy system - results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0105-x
Luderer G, DeCian E, Hourcade J-Ch, Leimbach M, Edenhofer O (2011b) The regional distribution of mitigation costs—a tale of scarcity rents. Clim Change (this issue)
Meinhausen M, Meinshausen N, Hare W, Raper S, Frieler K, Knutti R, Frame D, Allen M (2009) Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature 458:1158–1163
Meyer A (2004) Briefing: contraction and convergence. Engineering Sustainability 157(Issue 4):189–192
Mignone B, Socolow R, Sarmiento J, Oppenheimer M (2008) Atmospheric stabilization and the timing of carbon mitigation. Clim Change 88(3):251–265
Nordhaus WD (1992) An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258:1315–1319
Nordhaus WD, Yang Z (1996) A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. Am Econ Rev 86(4):741–765
Richels R, Rutherford T, Blanford G, Clarke L (2008) Managing the transition to climate stabilization. Climate Policy 7(5):409–428
Sassi O, Crassous R, Hourcade J-C, Gitz V, Waisman H, Guivarch C (2010) Imaclim-R: a modelling framework to simulate sustainable development pathways. Int J Global Environmental Issues 10(1/2):5–24
Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change. The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, New York
UNFCCC (2009) Decision -/CP.15. Available online at http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/application/pdf/cop15_cph_auv.pdf
van Vliet J, den Elzen MGJ, van Vuuren DP (2009) Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation. Energy Econ 31:152–162
Wigley T, Richels R, Edmonds J (1996) Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature 379(6562):240–243
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jakob, M., Luderer, G., Steckel, J. et al. Time to act now? Assessing the costs of delaying climate measures and benefits of early action. Climatic Change 114, 79–99 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0128-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0128-3