Climatic Change

, Volume 110, Issue 1–2, pp 269–296 | Cite as

U.S. National Forests adapt to climate change through Science–Management partnerships

  • Jeremy S. Littell
  • David L. Peterson
  • Constance I. Millar
  • Kathy A. O’Halloran
Article

Abstract

Developing appropriate management options for adapting to climate change is a new challenge for land managers, and integration of climate change concepts into operational management and planning on United States national forests is just starting. We established science–management partnerships on the Olympic National Forest (Washington) and Tahoe National Forest (California) in the first effort to develop adaptation options for specific national forests. We employed a focus group process in order to establish the scientific context necessary for understanding climate change and its anticipated effects, and to develop specific options for adapting to a warmer climate. Climate change scientists provided the scientific knowledge base on which adaptations could be based, and resource managers developed adaptation options based on their understanding of ecosystem structure, function, and management. General adaptation strategies developed by national forest managers include: (1) reduce vulnerability to anticipated climate-induced stress by increasing resilience at large spatial scales, (2) consider tradeoffs and conflicts that may affect adaptation success, (3) manage for realistic outcomes and prioritize treatments that facilitate adaptation to a warmer climate, (4) manage dynamically and experimentally, and (5) manage for structure and composition. Specific adaptation options include: (1) increase landscape diversity, (2) maintain biological diversity, (3) implement early detection/rapid response for exotic species and undesirable resource conditions, (4) treat large-scale disturbance as a management opportunity and integrate it in planning, (5) implement treatments that confer resilience at large spatial scales, (6) match engineering of infrastructure to expected future conditions, (7) promote education and awareness about climate change among resource staff and local publics, and (8) collaborate with a variety of partners on adaptation strategies and to promote ecoregional management. The process described here can quickly elicit a large amount of information relevant for adaptation to climate change, and can be emulated for other national forests, groups of national forests with similar resources, and other public lands. As adaptation options are iteratively generated for additional administrative units on public lands, management options can be compared, tested, and integrated into adaptive management. Science-based adaptation is imperative because increasing certainty about climate impacts and management outcomes may take decades.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett TP, Pierce DW, Hidalgo HG, Bonfils C, Santer BD, Das T, Bala G, Wood AW, Nozawa T, Mirin AA, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2008) Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science 319:1080–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battles J, Robards T, Das A, Waring K, Gilless JK, Biging G, Schurr F (2008) Climate change impacts on forest growth and tree mortality; a data-driven modeling study in the mixed-conifer forest of the Sierra Nevada, California. Climatic Change 87(Supplement 1):191–213Google Scholar
  3. Bosworth D, Birdsey R, Joyce L, Millar C (2008) Climate change and the nation’s forests: challenges and opportunities. J For 106(4):214–221Google Scholar
  4. Buckingham NM, Schreiner EG, Kaye TN, Burger JE, Tisch EL (1995) Flora of the olympic Peninsula. Northwest Interpretive Association, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cayan DR, Hanemann M (2008) Climate change adaptation: what should California do? In: Fifth annual climate change research conference, new scientific findings on impacts, mitigation, and adaptation. California Energy Commission, California EPA, and California Resources Agency. http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/events/2008_conference/presentations/index.html
  6. Cayan DR, Dettinger MD, Diaz HF, Graham NE (1999) Decadal variability of precipitation over Western North America. J Climate 11:3148–3166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cayan DR, Luers AL, Hanemann M, Guido F, Croes B (2006) Scenarios of climate change in California: an overview. Publication CEC-500-2005-186-SF. Final report from the California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research Program, California Climate Change Center, Sacramento, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Cayan DR, Sanstad A, Altevogt A, Luers A, Croes B, Franco G (2008) Climate action team draft report. Report of the California State Climate Action Team to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on scenarios and analysis of climate change in Califonia. California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research Program, California Climate Change Center, Sacramento, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniels SE, Walker GB (2001) Working through environmental conflict: the collaborative learning approach. Praeger Publishers, WestportGoogle Scholar
  10. de Loë RC, Kreutzwiser RD, Moraru L (2001) Adaptation options for the near term: climate change and the Canadian water sector. Glob Environ Change 11(3):231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dettinger MD, Cayan DR, Meyer MK, Jeton AE (2004) Simulated hydrologic response to climate variations and change in the Merced, Carson, and American River Basins, Sierra Nevada, California, 1900–2099. Climatic Change 62:283–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duane T (1996) Human settlement, 1850–2040. Pages 235–360 in Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress, vol. II, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Easterling WE, Hurd B, Smith J (2004) Coping with global climate change: the role of adaptation in the United States. Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/Adaptation%2Epdf
  14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2007) Adaptation to climate change in agriculture, forestry and fisheries: perspective, framework and priorities. FAO Information Division, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. Francis RC, Mantua NJ (2003) Climatic influences on salmon populations in the Northeast Pacific. In: MacCall AD, Wainwright TC (eds) Assessing extinction risk for West Coast salmon. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-56. US Department of Commerce, Seattle, Washington, USA, pp 37–67Google Scholar
  16. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2007) Climate change: agencies should develop guidance for addressing the effects on federal land and water resources. Report to Congress GAO 07–863. United States Government, Washington, District of Columbia, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamlet AF, Mote PW, Clark MP, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Effects of temperature and precipitation variability on snowpack trends in the western US. J Climate 18:4545–4561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamlet AF, Mote PW, Clark MP, Lettenmaier DP (2007) 20th century trends in runoff, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture in the western US. J Climate 20:1468–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen LJ, Biringer JL, Hoffman JR (eds) (2003) Buying time: a user’s manual for building resistance and resilience to climate change in natural systems. World Wildlife Fund, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field CB, Frumhoff PC, Maurer EP, Miller NL, Moser SC, Schneider SH, Cahill KN, Cleland EE, Dale L, Drapek R, Hanemann RM, Kalkstein LS, Lenihan J, Lunch CK, Neilson RN, Sheridan SC, Verville JH (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:12422–12427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA) of 2003. 16 U.S.C. 6501 et seqGoogle Scholar
  22. Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS (2008) Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv Biol 22(3):534–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henderson JA, Peter DH, Lesher RD, Shaw DC (1989) Forested plant associations of the Olympic National Forest. US Forest Service Region 6 Ecology Technical Paper 001-88Google Scholar
  24. Herger-Feinstein Quincy Library Group Forest Recovery Act (1998) 16 U.S.C. 2104 noteGoogle Scholar
  25. Hidalgo HG, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (2008) Downscaling with constructed analogues: daily precipitation and temperature fields over the United States. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research. CEC-500-2007-123. http://cascade.wr.usgs.gov/data/Task1-climate/gridded_data_US/supporting_materials/CEC-500-2007-123.pdf
  26. Holman ML, Peterson DL (2006) Spatial and temporal variability in forest growth in the Olympic Mountains, Washington: sensitivity to climatic variability. Can J For Res 36:92–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Summary for policymakers. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Secretariat, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  28. Joyce L, Haynes R, White R, Barbour J (eds) (2007) Bringing climate change into natural resource management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report GTR-PNW-706. Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  29. Joyce L, Blate GM, Littell JS, McNulty SG, Millar CI, Moser SC, Neilson RP, O’Halloran K, Peterson DL (2008) Chapter 3, national forests. In: Julius SJ, West JM (eds) Preliminary review of adaptation options of climate-sensitive ecosystems and resources. US Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, Washington, District of ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  30. Julius SH, West JM (2008) Preliminary review of adaptation options of climate-sensitive ecosystems and resources. US Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, Washington, District of Columbia, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. Kane SM, Yohe GW (eds) (2000) Societal adaptation to climate variability and change. Kluwer Adademic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  32. Knowles N, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (2006) Trends in snowfall versus rainfall in the western United States. J Climate 19:4545–4559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lenihan JM, Bachelet D, Drapek RJ, Neilson RP (2008) The response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire in California to future climate scenarios simulated by the MC1 dynamic vegetation model. Clim Change 87(Supp 1):S215–S230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ligeti E, Penney J, Wieditz I (2007) Cities preparing for climate change: a study of six urban regions. Clean Air Partnership. http://www.cleanairpartnership.org/pdf/cities_climate_change.pdf
  35. Littell JS, Peterson DL, Tjoelker M (2008) Douglas-fir growth in mountain ecosystems: water limits tree growth from stand to region. Ecol Monogr 78:349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Littell JS, McKenzie D, Peterson DL, Westerling AL (2009) Climate and wildfire area burned in Western US ecoprovinces, 1916–2003. Ecol Appl 19:1003–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Loarie SR, Carter BE, Hayhoe K, McMahon S, Moe R, Knight CA, Ackerly DA (2008) Climate change and the future of California’s endemic flora. PLoS ONE 3:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Logan JA, Powell JA (2001) Ghost forests, global warming, and the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Am Entomol 47:160–172Google Scholar
  39. Logan JA, Régnière J, Powell JA (2003) Assessing the impacts of global climate change on forest pests. Front Ecol Environ 1:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luers AL, Moser SC (2006) Preparing for the impacts of climate change in California: opportunitiesand constraints for adaptation. White Paper prepared for the California EnergyCommission (Energy Commission) and the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA)Google Scholar
  41. MacIver DC, Dallmeier F (2000) Adaptation to climate change variability: adaptive management. Environ Monit Assess 61:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maurer EP (2007) Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California under two emissions scenarios. Climatic Change 82:309–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCabe GJ, Wolock DM (2002) Trends and temperature sensitivity of moisture conditions in the conterminous United States. Clim Res 20:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Millar CI, Westfall RD, Delany DL, King JC, Graumlich LC (2004) Response of subalpine conifers in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA, to 20th-century warming and decadal climate variability. Arct Antarct Alp Res 36:181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007a) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Millar CI, Westfall RD, Delany DL (2007b) Response of high-elevation limber pine (Pinus flexilis) to multi-year droughts and 20th-century warming, Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Can J For Res 37:2508–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mote PW (2003) Trends in temperature and precipitation in the Pacific Northwest during the 20th century. Northwest Sci 77:271–282Google Scholar
  48. Mote PW, Hamlet AF, Clark M, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Declining mountain snowpack in western North America. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 86:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nakawatase JM, Peterson DL (2006) Spatial variability in forest growth–climate relationships in the Olympic Mountains, Washington. Can J For Res 36:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2005) Drought information center. Historic summary: Palmer Drought Severity Index. http://www.drought.noaa.gov
  51. Peterson DW, Peterson DL (2001) Mountain hemlock growth responds to climatic variability at annual and decadal scales. Ecology 82:3330–3345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peterson DW, Peterson DL, Ettl GJ (2002) Growth responses of subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) to climatic variability in the Pacific Northwest. Can J For Res 32:1503–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rojas Blanco AV (2006) Local initiatives and adaptation to climate change. Disasters 30:140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salathé EP (2005) Downscaling simulations of future global climate with application to hydrologic modelling. Int J Climatol 25:419–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Salathé EP, Mote PW, Wiley MW (2007) Review of scenario selection and downscaling methods for the assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology in the United States Pacific Northwest. Int J Climatol 27:1611–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Salathé EP Jr, Zhang Y, Leung LR, Qian Y (2010) Regional climate model projections for the State of Washington. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9849-y Google Scholar
  57. Shevock J (1996) Status of rare and endemic plants. Pages 691–707 in Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: final report to Congress, vol. II, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith JB, Klein RJT, Huq S (eds) (2003) Climate change, adaptive capacity and development. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Snover AK, Whitely Binder LC, Lopez J, Willmott E, Kay JE, Howell D, Simmonds J (2007) Preparing for climate change: a guidebook for local, regional, and state governments. ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  60. Stewart I, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2004) Changes in snowmelt runoff timing in western North America under a “business as usual” climate change scenario. Climatic Change 62:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stewart IT, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2005) Changes towards earlier streamflow timing across western North America. J Climate 18:1136–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Swanson FJ, Franklin JF (1992) New forestry principles from ecosystem analysis of Pacific Northwest Forests. Ecol Appl 2:262–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taylor SW, Carroll AL, Alfaro RI, Safranyik L (2006) Forest, climate and mountain pine beetle outbreak dynamics in western Canada. In: Safranyik L, Wilson WR (eds) The mountain pine beetle: a synthesis of biology, management, and impacts on lodgepole pine. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, pp 67–94Google Scholar
  64. Thorne JH, Morgan BJ, Kennedy JA (2008) Vegetation change over sixty years in the central Sierra Nevada. Madroño 55(3):223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Mantgem P, Stephenson NL (2007) Apparent climatically induced increase of tree mortality in a temperate forest. Ecol Lett 10:909–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Westerling AL (2008) Climate and wildfire in the western US. White paper to the California Climate Change Center, State of California. http://www.meteora.ucsd.edu/cap/fire.html
  67. Westerling AL, Bryant BP (2006) Climate change and wildfire in and around California: fire modeling and loss modeling. Public Interest Energy Research, California Energy Commission. CEC-500-2005-190-SF, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  68. Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313:940–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilkinson R, Clarke K, Goodchild M, Reichman J (2002) Preparing for climate change: the potential consequences of climate variability and change for California. The California regional assessment: a report of the California Regional Assessment Group for the US Global Change Research Program. National Science Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/pubs/CA_Report.pdf
  70. Woodward A, Schreiner EG, Silsbee DG (1995) Climate, geography, and tree establishment in subalpine meadows of the Olympic Mountains, Washington, USA. Arct Alp Res 27(3):217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zolbrod AN, Peterson DL (1999) Response of high-elevation forests in the Olympic Mountains to climatic change. Can J For Res 29:1966–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© U.S. Government 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy S. Littell
    • 1
  • David L. Peterson
    • 2
  • Constance I. Millar
    • 3
  • Kathy A. O’Halloran
    • 4
  1. 1.JISAO CSES Climate Impacts GroupUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research StationSeattleUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research StationAlbanyUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Forest Service, Olympic National ForestOlympiaUSA

Personalised recommendations