Skip to main content

Political orientation moderates Americans’ beliefs and concern about climate change

An editorial comment

Abstract

I offer some theoretical insights to help us better understand the moderator effect of political orientation that Larry Hamilton and others have found in recent years. Reflexive modernization theory highlights an emerging tension between those who direct attention to the negative consequences of industrial capitalism such as climate change (e.g., the scientific community and environmental organizations) and those who defend the economic system against such critiques (e.g., the conservative movement). Political divisions in the American public increasingly map onto these societal divisions between critics and defenders of the industrial capitalist order—especially for the issue of climate change. This alignment is facilitated by increased polarization among political elites and balkanization of the news media. Strong evidence of the moderator effect is consistent with the expectations of information processing theory and elite cues hypothesis from political science. Recent empirical findings in political psychology and neuroscience also seem pertinent for explaining this moderator effect. I end by outlining a few implications for climate change research and communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Amodio DM, Jost JT, Master SL, Yee CM (2007) Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nat Neurosci 10:1246–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum MA, Groeling T (2008) New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Polit Commun 25:345–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society: toward a new modernity. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1997) The reinvention of politics. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (eds) (1994) Reflexive modernization: politics, traditions, and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob Environ Change 14:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen R, Bell P (2007) Congressional insiders poll. Natl J 39(5):6–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Dispensa JM, Brulle RJ (2003) Media’s social construction of environmental issues. Int J Sociol Soc Policy 23:74–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment 50(5):26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2010) Climate change denial: sources, actors, and strategies. In: Lever-Tracy C (ed) The Routledge international handbook of climate change and society, pp 240–259

  • Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD (1984) Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Soc Sci Q 65:1013–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Xiao C, McCright AM (2001) Politics and environment in America: partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Env Polit 10(4):23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feygina I, Jost JT, Goldsmith RE (2010) System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of ‘system-sanctioned change’. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 36:326–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Polity, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson B (2000) Reflexive modernization. Int Plan Stud 5:117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RFL (1994) The fairness doctrine and the first amendment: phoenix rising. Mercer Law Rev 45:705–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LC (2008) Who cares about polar regions? Arct Antarct Alp Res 40:671–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LC (2011) Education, politics, and opinions about climate change: evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change

  • Hamilton LC, Keim BD (2009) Regional variation in perceptions about climate change. Int J Climatol 29:2348–2352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007, vol 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Published for the intergovernmental panel on climate change

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar S, Hahn K (2009) Red media, blue media. J Commun 59:19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost JT, Nosek BA, Gosling SD (2008) Ideology: its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspect Psychol Sci 3(2):126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Visser PS (2000) The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Underst Sci 9:239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahsen M (2005) Technocracy, democracy, and U. S. climate politics. Sci Technol Human Values 30:137–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahsen M (2008) Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: a cultural analysis of a physicist ‘trio’ supporting the backlash against global warming. Glob Environ Change 18:204–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupia A, McCubbins MD (1998) The democratic dilemma. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Malka A, Krosnick JA, Langer G (2009) The association of knowledge with concern about global warming. Risk Anal 29:633–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty N, Poole K, Rosenthal H (2006) Polarized America. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM (2007) Dealing with climate change contrarians. In: Moser SC, Dilling L (eds) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 200–212

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM (2009) The social bases of climate change knowledge, concern, and policy support in the US general public. Hofstra Law Rev 34:1017–1047

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM (2010) The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Popul Environ 32:66–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2000) Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement’s counter claims. Soc Probl 47(4):499–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2003) Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Soc Probl 50(3):348–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2010) Anti-reflexivity: the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory Cult Soc 27(2–3):100–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change: political polarization in the American public’s views of global warming. Sociol Quart 52:Forthcoming

  • McCright AM, Shwom RL (2010) Newspaper and television coverage. In: Schneider SH, Rosencranz A, Mastrandrea MD, Kuntz-Duriseti K (eds) Climate change science and policy. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp 405–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels D (2008) Doubt is their product. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol APJ (2000) The environmental movement in an era of ecological modernization. Geoforum 31:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol APJ, Spaargaren G (2000) Ecological modernization theory in debate. Env Polit 9:17–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes N, Conway EM, Shindell M (2008) From chicken little to dr. pangloss: William Nierenberg, global warming, and the social deconstruction of scientific knowledge. Hist Stud Nat Sci 38:109–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg A (1980) The environment: from surplus to scarcity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood BD, Vedlitz A (2007) Issue definition, information processing, and the politics of global warming. Am J Polit Sci 51:552–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron M. McCright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCright, A.M. Political orientation moderates Americans’ beliefs and concern about climate change. Climatic Change 104, 243–253 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9946-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9946-y

Keywords

  • Global Warming
  • Political Orientation
  • Political Elite
  • Climate Science
  • Party Identification