Climatic Change

, Volume 102, Issue 1–2, pp 129–158 | Cite as

Forest ecosystems, disturbance, and climatic change in Washington State, USA

  • Jeremy S. Littell
  • Elaine E. Oneil
  • Donald McKenzie
  • Jeffrey A. Hicke
  • James A. Lutz
  • Robert A. Norheim
  • Marketa M. Elsner
Article

Abstract

Climatic change is likely to affect Pacific Northwest (PNW) forests in several important ways. In this paper, we address the role of climate in four forest ecosystem processes and project the effects of future climatic change on these processes across Washington State. First, we relate Douglas-fir growth to climatic limitation and suggest that where Douglas-fir is currently water-limited, growth is likely to decline due to increased summer water deficit. Second, we use existing analyses of climatic controls on tree species biogeography to demonstrate that by the mid twenty-first century, climate will be less suitable for key species in some areas of Washington. Third, we examine the relationships between climate and the area burned by fire and project climatically driven regional and sub-regional increases in area burned. Fourth, we suggest that climatic change influences mountain pine beetle (MPB) outbreaks by increasing host-tree vulnerability and by shifting the region of climate suitability upward in elevation. The increased rates of disturbance by fire and mountain pine beetle are likely to be more significant agents of changes in forests in the twenty-first century than species turnover or declines in productivity, suggesting that understanding future disturbance regimes is critical for successful adaptation to climate change.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agee JK, Flewelling R (1983) A fire cycle model based on climate for the Olympic Mountains, Washington, vol 7. In: Proceedings, Seventh conference on fire and forest meteorology, Fort Collins, CO, 25–28 April, pp 32–37Google Scholar
  2. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19(6):716–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen CD, Breshears DD (1998) Drought-induced shift of a forest–woodland ecotone: rapid landscape response to climate variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:14839–14842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey RG (1995) Description of the ecoregions of the United States. USDA For Service Miscs Public 1391 (revis), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentz BJ, Logan JA, Amman GD (1991) Temperature-dependent development of mountain pine beetle and simulation of its phenology. Can Entomol 123:1083–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boisvenue C, Running SW (2006) Impacts of climate change on natural forest productivity—evidence since the middle of the 20th century. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 12:862–882Google Scholar
  7. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breshears DD, Cobb NS, Rich PM, Price KP, Allen CD, Balice RG, Romme WH, Kastens JH, Floyd ML, Belnap J, Anderson JJ, Myers OB, Meyer CW (2005) Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:15144–15148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll AL, Taylor SW, Regniere J, Safranyik L (2004) Effects of climate change on range expansion by the mountain pine beetle in British Columbia. In: Mountain pine beetle symposium: challenges and solutions. Nat Resour Can, Can For Serv, Pacific For Cen, Kelowna, BC, pp 223–232Google Scholar
  10. Case MJ, Peterson DL (2007) Growth–climate relations of lodgepole pine in the North Cascades National Park, Washington. Northwest Sci 81(1):62–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cayan DR (1996) Interannual climate variability and snow pack in the western United States. J Climate 9(5):928–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cushman SA, McKenzie D, Peterson DL, Littell JS, McKelvey KS (2007) Research agenda for integrated landscape modeling. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep RMRS-GTR-194, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Fort Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  13. Daly C, Halbleib M, Smith JI, Gibson WP, Doggett MK, Taylor GH, Curtis J, Pasteris PA (2008) Physiographically sensitive mapping of temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.1688 Google Scholar
  14. Davis MB (1986) Climatic instability, time lags, and community disequilibrium. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, pp 269–284Google Scholar
  15. Davis MB, Botkin DB (1985) Sensitivity of cool-temperate forests and their fossil pollen record to rapid temperature change. Quat Res 23:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeLucia EH, Maherali H, Carey EV (2000) Climate-driven changes in biomass allocation in pines. Glob Chang Biol 6(5):587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elsner MM, Cuo L, Voisin N, Deems JS, Hamlet AF, Vano JA, Mickelson KEB, Lee S-Y, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Implications of 21st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington State. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9855-0 Google Scholar
  18. Franklin JF, Dyrness CT (1988) Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State Univerity Press, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  19. Gedalof Z, Peterson DL, Mantua NJ (2005) Atmospheric, climatic, and ecological controls on extreme wildfire years in the Northwestern United States. Ecol Appl 15:154–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillett NP, Weaver AJ, Zwiers FW, Flannigan MD (2004) Detecting the effect of climate change on Canadian forest fires. Geophys Res Lett 31:L18211. doi:10.1029/2004GL020876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henderson JA, Peter DH (1981) Preliminary plant associations and habitat types of the Shelton Ranger District, Olympic National Forest. USDA For Serv, Pacific Northwest Reg, Portland, OR, p 53Google Scholar
  23. Henderson JA, Peter DH, Lesher RD, Shaw DC (1989) Forested plant associations of the Olympic National Forest. USDA For Service, Pacific Northwest Res Stn R6-ECOL-TP-001-88, Portland, p 502Google Scholar
  24. Henderson JA, Lesher RD, Peter DH, Shaw DC (1992) Field guide to the forested plant associations of the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest. USDA For Service, Pacific Northwest Res Stn R6-ECOL-TP-028-91, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  25. Hessl AE, McKenzie D, Schellhaas R (2004) Drought and pacific decadal oscillation affect fire occurrence in the inland Pacific Northwest. Ecol Appl 14:425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hicke JA, Jenkins JC (2008) Mapping lodgepole pine stand structure susceptibility to mountain pine beetle attack across the western United States. For Ecol Manag 255:1536–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hicke JA, Logan JA, Powell J, Ojima DS (2006) Changing temperatures influence suitability for modeled mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) outbreaks in the western United States. J Geophys Res B 111:G02019. doi:10.1029/2005JG000101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007a) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Summary for policymakers. http://www.ipcc.ch
  29. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007b) Working group II report. Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg2.htm
  30. Jenkins MJ, Hebertson E, Page W, Jorgensen CA (2008) Bark beetles, fuels, fires and implications for forest management in the Intermountain West. For Ecol Manag 254(1):16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joyce LA, Blate GM, Littell JS, McNulty SG, Millar CI, Moser SC, Neilson RP (2008) National forests, chapter 3. In: Julius SH, West JM (eds) JS Baron, B Griffith, LA Joyce, P Kareiva, BD Keller, MA Palmer, CH Peterson, and JM Scott (authors), Preliminary review of adaptation options for climate-sensitive ecosystems and resources. A report by the US climate change science program and the Subcommittee on global change research. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, pp 3-1–3-127Google Scholar
  32. Kimball JS, Running SW, Nemani R (1997) An improved method for estimating surface humidity from daily minimum temperature. Agric For Meteorol 85:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knowles N, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (2006) Trends in snowfall versus rainfall in the western United States. J Climate 19:4545–4559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lenihan JM, Bachelet D, Neilson RP, Drapek RJ (2008) Simulated response of conterminous united states ecosystems to climate change at different levels of fire suppression, CO2 emission rate, and growth response to CO2. Glob Planet Change 64:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lillybridge TR, Kovalchik BL, Williams CK, Smith BG (1995) Field guide to forested plant associations of the Wenatchee National Forest. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-359. Pacific Northwest Res Stn, Portland, p 336Google Scholar
  36. Littell JS (2006) Climate impacts to forest ecosystem processes: Douglas-Fir growth in Northwestern U.S. Mountain Landscapes and Area Burned by Wildfire in Western U.S. Ecoprovinces. PhD dissertation. University of Washington, Coll For Resources, Seattle, p 160Google Scholar
  37. Littell JS, Peterson DL (2005) A method for estimating vulnerability of Douglas-fir growth to climate change in the Northwestern US. For Chron 81:369–374Google Scholar
  38. Littell JS, Peterson DL, Tjoelker M (2008) Douglas-fir growth-climate relationships along biophysical gradients in mountain protected areas of the northwestern U.S. Ecol Monogr 78(3):349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Littell JS, McKenzie D, Peterson DL, Westerling AL (2009) Climate and wildfire area burned in western US ecoprovinces, 1916–2003. Ecol Appl 19:1003–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lloyd AH, Graumlich LJ (1997) A 3,500 year record of changes in the structure and distribution of forests at treeline in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Ecology 78:1199–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Logan JA, Amman GD (1986) A distribution model for egg development in mountain pine beetle. Can Entomol 118:361–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Logan JA, Bentz BJ (1999) Model analysis of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) seasonality. Environ Entomol 28:924–934Google Scholar
  43. Logan JA, Powell JA (2001) Ghost forests, global warming and the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Am Entomol 47:160–173Google Scholar
  44. Logan JA, Powell JA (2004) Modeling mountain pine beetle phenological response to temperature. In: Mountain pine beetle symposium: challenges and solutions. Nat Res Can, Can For Serv, Pacific For Cen, Kelowna, pp 210–222Google Scholar
  45. Logan JA, Bolstad PV, Bentz BJ, Perkins DL (1995) Assessing the effects of changing climate on mountain pine beetle dynamics. In: Workshop on interior west global climate. USDA For Serv, Fort Collins, CO, pp 92–105Google Scholar
  46. Lutz JA (2008) Climate, fire, and vegetation change in Yosemite National Park. PhD dissertation. University of Washington, Coll For Resources Seattle, Washington, USA, p 169Google Scholar
  47. Lutz JA, Halpern CB (2006) Tree mortality during early forest development: a long-term study of rates, causes, and consequences. Ecol Monogr 76:257–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lynch HJ, Renkin RA, Crabtree RL, Moorcroft PR (2006) The influence of previous mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) activity on the 1988 Yellowstone fires. Ecosystems 9:1318–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McKenzie D, Hessl AE, Peterson DL (2001) Recent growth in conifer species of western North America: assessing the spatial patterns of radial growth trends. Can J For Res 31:526–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McKenzie D, Peterson DW, Peterson DL, Thornton PE (2003) Climatic and biophysical controls on conifer species distributions in mountain forests of Washington state, USA. J Biogeogr 30:1093–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McKenzie D, Gedalof Z, Peterson DL, Mote PW (2004) Climatic change, wildfire, and conservation. Conserv Biol 18:890–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McKenzie D, Peterson DL, Littell JS (2009) Global warming and stress complexes in forests of western North America. In: Krupa SV, Bytnerowicz A, Arbaugh M, Riebau A, Anderson C (eds) Developments in environmental science, wild land fires and air pollution, vol 8. Elsevier Science, Ltd., Amsterdam, pp 319–337Google Scholar
  53. Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Milne BT, Gupta VK, Restrepo C (2002) A scale-invariant coupling of plants, water, energy, and terrain. Ecoscience 9:191–199Google Scholar
  55. Mote PW, Jr Salathé EP (2010) Future climate in the Pacific Northwest. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9848-z Google Scholar
  56. Mote PW, Hamlet AF, Clark MP, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Declining mountain snowpack in western North America. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 86:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nakawatase JM, Peterson DL (2006) Spatial variability in forest growth–climate relationships in the Olympic Mountains, Washington. Can J For Res 36:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. National Fire Center and Aviation Management (2007) http://fam.nwcg.gov/fam-web/weatherfirecd/fire_files.htm. Accessed 20 Nov 2007
  59. Neilson RP, Pitelka LF, Solomon AM, Nathan R, Midgley GF, Fragoso JMV, Lischke H, Thompson K (2005) Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change. Bioscience 55:749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oneil EE (2006) Developing stand density thresholds to address mountain pine beetle susceptibility in eastern Washington forests. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, p 99Google Scholar
  61. Overpeck JT, Rind D, Goldberg R (1990) Climate-induced changes in forest disturbance and vegetation. Nature 343:51–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Peterson DW, Peterson DL (2001) Mountain hemlock growth responds to climatic variability at annual and decadal scales. Ecology 82:3330–3345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Powell JA, Logan JA (2005) Insect seasonality: circle map analysis of temperature-driven life cycles. Theor Popul Biol 67:161–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rehfeldt GE, Crookston NL, Warwell MV, Evans JS (2006) Empirical analysis of plant–climate relationships for the western United States. Int J Plant Sci 167(6):1123–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Running SW, Nemani RR, Hungerford RD (1987) Extrapolation of synoptic meteorological data in mountainous terrain and its use for simulating forest evapotranspiration and photosynthesis. Can J For Res 17(6):472–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Running SW, Nemani RR, Heinsch FA, Zhao M, Reeves M, Hashimoto H (2004) A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54(6):547–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sacks WJ, Schimel DS, Monson RK (2007) Coupling between carbon cycling and climate in a high-elevation subalpine forest: a model-data fusion analysis. Oecologia 151(1):54–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Salathé Jr EP, Mote PW, Wiley MW (2007) Review of scenario selection and downscaling methods for the assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology in the United States Pacific Northwest. Int J Climatol 27:1611–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stephenson NL (1990) Climatic control of vegetation distribution: the role of the water balance. Am Nat 135:649–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stephenson NL (1998) Actual evapotranspiration and deficit: biologically meaningful correlates of vegetation distribution across spatial scales. J Biogeogr 25:855–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Swetnam TW, Lynch AM (1993) Multicentury, regional-scale patterns of western spruce budworm outbreaks. Ecol Monogr 63(4):399–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thornton PE, Running SW (1999) An improved algorithm for estimating incident daily solar radiation from measurements of temperature, humidity, and precipitation. Agric For Meteorol 93(4):211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA (1997) Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol 190(3–4):214–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thornton PE, Hasenauer H, White MA (2000) Simultaneous estimation of daily solar radiation and humidity from observed temperature and precipitation: an application over complex terrain in Austria. Agric For Meteorol 104:255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL (2007) Apparent climatically induced increase of tree mortality rates in a temperate forest. Ecol Lett 10:909–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL, Byrne JC, Daniels LD, Franklin JF, Fulé PZ, Harmon ME, Larson AJ, Smith JM, Taylor AH, Veblen TT (2009) Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States. Science 323:521–524. doi:10.1126/science.1165000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York, p 495Google Scholar
  78. Waring RH, Running SW (1998) Forest ecosystems: analysis at multiple scales. Academic Press, New York, p 370Google Scholar
  79. Wellner CA (1978) Management problems resulting from mountain pine beetles in lodgepole pine forests. In: Theory and practice of mountain pine beetle management in lodgepole pine forests. Pullman, WA, For, Wildlife and Range Exp Stn, University of Idaho, pp 9–15Google Scholar
  80. Williams CK, Lillybridge TR (1983) Forested plant associations of the Okanogan National Forest. USDA Forest Serv Tech Pap R6-ECOL-132b-1983. Pacific Northwest Res Stn, Portland, p 140Google Scholar
  81. Williams CK, Lillybridge TR, Smith BG (1990) Forested plant associations of the Colville National Forest, field guide. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Res Stn, Portland, p 133Google Scholar

Copyright information

© U.S. Government 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy S. Littell
    • 1
  • Elaine E. Oneil
    • 2
  • Donald McKenzie
    • 3
  • Jeffrey A. Hicke
    • 4
  • James A. Lutz
    • 5
  • Robert A. Norheim
    • 1
    • 5
  • Marketa M. Elsner
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts GroupUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Rural Technology Initiative, School of Forest ResourcesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences LabUS Forest ServiceSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Department of GeographyUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  5. 5.School of Forest ResourcesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  6. 6.University of WASeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations