Climatic Change

, Volume 102, Issue 1–2, pp 29–50

Future climate in the Pacific Northwest

Article

Abstract

Climate models used in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) on the whole reproduce the observed seasonal cycle and twentieth century warming trend of 0.8°C (1.5°F) in the Pacific Northwest, and point to much greater warming for the next century. These models project increases in annual temperature of, on average, 1.1°C (2.0°F) by the 2020s, 1.8°C (3.2°F) by the 2040s, and 3.0°C (5.3°F) by the 2080s, compared with the average from 1970 to 1999, averaged across all climate models. Rates of warming range from 0.1°C to 0.6°C (0.2°F to 1.0°F) per decade. Projected changes in annual precipitation, averaged over all models, are small (+1% to +2%), but some models project an enhanced seasonal cycle with changes toward wetter autumns and winters and drier summers. Changes in nearshore sea surface temperatures, though smaller than on land, are likely to substantially exceed interannual variability, but coastal upwelling changes little. Rates of twenty-first century sea level rise will depend on poorly known factors like ice sheet instability in Greenland and Antarctica, and could be as low as twentieth century values (20 cm, 8) or as large as 1.3 m (50).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avise J, Chen J, Lamb B, Wiedinmyer C, Guenther A, Salathé E, Mass C (2009) Attribution of projected changes in US ozone and PM2.5 concentrations to global changes. Atmos Chem Phys 9:1111–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bader DC, Covey C, Gutowski WJ Jr, Held IM, Kunkel KE, Miller RL, Tokmakian RT, Zhang MH (2008) Climate models: an assessment of strengths and limitations. A report by the US Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA, 124 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Brekke LD, Dettinger MD, Maurer EP, Anderson M (2008) Significance of model credibility in estimating climate projection distributions for regional hydroclimatological risk assessments. Clim Change 89(3–4):371–394. doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9388-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cayan DR, Maurer EP, Dettinger MD, Tyree M, Hayhoe K (2007) Climate change scenarios for the California region. Clim Change 87:21–42. doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9377-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen JH et al (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Elsner MM, Cuo L, Voisin N, Deems JS, Hamlet AF, Vano JA, Mickelson KEB, Lee SY, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Implications of 21st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington State. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9855-0 Google Scholar
  7. Giorgi F, Mearns LO (2002) Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the reliability ensemble averaging (REA) method. J Clim 15:1141–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamlet AF, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Production of temporally consistent gridded precipitation and temperature fields for the continental United States. J Hydrometeorol 6:330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. In: Houghton JT et al (eds) Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, 881 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lettenmaier DP, Gan TY (1990) Hydrologic sensitivities of the Sacramento–San Joaquin River basin, California, to global warming. Water Resour Res 26:69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leung LR, Qian Y, Bin X, Washington WM, Han J, Roads JO (2004) Mid-century ensemble regional climate change scenarios for the western United States. Clim Change 62:75–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loáiciga HA, Maidment DR, Valdes JB (2000) Climate-change impacts in a regional karst aquifer, Texas, USA. J Hydrol 227:173–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maurer EP, Brekke L, Pruitt T, Duffy PB (2007) Fine-resolution climate change projections enhance regional climate change impact studies. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 88(47):504. doi:510.1029/2007EO470006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McKenzie D, Gedalof ZM, Peterson DL, Mote PW (2004) Climatic change, wildfire, and conservation. Conserv Biol 18(4):890–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell TD, Carter TR, Jones PD, Hulme M, New M (2004) A comprehensive set of climate scenarios for Europe and the globe: the observed record (1901–2000) and 16 scenarios (2001–2100). Tyndall Centre Working Paper No 55, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Mote PW (2003) Trends in temperature and precipitation in the Pacific Northwest. Northwest Sci 77:271–282Google Scholar
  19. Mote PW, Mantua NJ (2002) Coastal upwelling in a warming future. Geophys Res Lett 29(23):2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mote PW, Salathé EP (2010) Future climate in the Pacific Northwest, Chap 1. In: The Washington climate change impacts assessment: evaluating Washington’s future in a changing climate, climate impacts group. University of Washington, Seattle, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Mote PW, Salathé EP, Peacock C (2005) Scenarios of future climate for the Pacific Northwest. Climate Impacts Group, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington, 13 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Mote PW, Peterson A, Reeder S, Shipman H, Whitely Binder L (2008) Sea level rise in the coastal waters of Washington state. Climate Impacts Group, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington, 11 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakićenović N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. A special report of working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 599 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmer RN, Hahn MA (2002) The impacts of climate change on Portland’s water supply: an investigation of potential hydrologic and management impacts on the Bull Run system. Report prepared for the Portland Water Bureau, University of Washington, Seattle, 139 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Randall DA, Wood RA, Bony S, Colman R, Fichefet T, Fyfe J, Kattsov V, Pitman A, Shukla J, Srinivasan J, Stouffer RJ, Sumi A, Taylor KE (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Raupach MR, Marland G, Ciais P, Le Quéré C, Canadell JG, Klepper G, Field CB (2007) Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(24):2138. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700609104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodenhuis DR, Bennett KE, Werner AT, Murdock TQ, Bronaugh D (2007) Hydro-climatology and future climate impacts in British Columbia. Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, 132 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Salathé EP (2005) Downscaling simulations of future global climate with application to hydrologic modeling. Int J Climatol 25:419–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salathé EP, Mote PW, Wiley MW (2007) Review of scenario selection and downscaling methods for the assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology in the United States pacific northwest. Int J Climatol 27:1611–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Salathé EP, Steed R, Mass CF, Zahn P (2008) A high-resolution climate model for the US Pacific Northwest: mesoscale feedbacks and local responses to climate change. J Clim 21:5708–5726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salathé EP, Leung LR, Qian Y, Zhang Y (2010) Regional climate model projections for the State of Washington. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9849-y Google Scholar
  32. Schellnhuber HJ et al (eds) (2006) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Stainforth DA et al (2005) Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433:403–406. doi:10.1038/nature03301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor KE (2000) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Report No 55 of the Program for climate model diagnosis and intercomparison, Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  35. Trenberth KE, Jones PD, Ambenje P, Bojariu R, Easterling D, Klein Tank A, Parker D, Rahimzadeh F, Renwick JA, Rusticucci M, Soden B, Zhai P (2007) Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Widmann M, Bretherton CS, Salathé EP (2003) Statistical precipitation downscaling over the Northwestern United States using numerically simulated precipitation as a predictor. J Clim 16:799–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood AW, Maurer EP, Kumar A, Lettenmaier DP (2002) Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States. J Geophys Res-Atmos 107:4429–4443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC, Lambert FH, Gillett NP, Solomon S, Stott PA, Nozawa T (2007) Detection of human influence on twentieth-century precipitation trends. Nature 448:461–465. doi:10.1038/nature06025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts GroupUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Oregon Climate Change Research Institute, College of Oceanic and Atmospheric SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations