Climatic Change

, Volume 99, Issue 3–4, pp 637–645 | Cite as

Sources of spread in simulations of Arctic sea ice loss over the twenty-first century

A letter
Open Access
Letter

Abstract

We show that intermodel variations in the anthropogenically-forced evolution of September sea ice extent (SSIE) in the Arctic stem mainly from two factors: the baseline climatological sea ice thickness (SIT) distribution, and the local climate feedback parameter. The roles of these two factors evolve over the course of the twenty-first century. The SIT distribution is the most important factor in current trends and those of coming decades, accounting for roughly half the intermodel variations in SSIE trends. Then, its role progressively decreases, so that around the middle of the twenty-first century the local climate feedback parameter becomes the dominant factor. Through this analysis, we identify the investments in improved simulation of Arctic climate necessary to reduce uncertainties both in projections of sea ice loss over the coming decades and in the ultimate fate of the ice pack.

References

  1. Bitz CM (2008) Some aspects of uncertainty in predicting sea ice retreat. In: deWeaver E, Bitz CM, Tremblay B (eds) Arctic Sea ice decline: observations, projections, mechanisms, and implications. AGU Geophysical Monograph Series, vol 189, p 269Google Scholar
  2. Boé J, Hall A, Qu X (2009a) September sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100. Nature Geosci 2:341–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boé J, Hall A, Qu X (2009b) Current GCM’s unrealistic negative feedback in the Arctic. J Climate 22:4682–4695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavalieri D, Parkinson C, Gloersen P, Zwally HJ (1996) Sea ice concentrations from Nimbus-7 SMMR and DMSP SSM/I passive microwave data. Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center. Digital media (updated 2008)Google Scholar
  5. Gerdes R (2006) Atmospheric response to changes in Arctic sea ice thickness. Geophys Res Lett 33:L18709. doi:10.1029/2006GL027146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall A (2004) Role of surface albedo feedback in climate. J Climate 17:1550–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holland MM, Bitz CM (2003) Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models. Clim Dyn 21:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holland MM, Bitz CM, Hunke EC, Lipscomb WH, Schramm JL (2006a) Influence of the sea ice thickness distribution on polar climate in CCSM3. J Climate 19:2398–2414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holland MM, Bitz CM, Tremblay B (2006b) Future abrupt reductions in the summer arctic sea ice. Geophys Res Lett 33:L23503. doi:10.1029/2006GL028024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland MM, Serreze MC, Stroeve J (2008). The sea ice mass budget of the Arctic and its future change as simulated by coupled climate models. Clim Dyn (published online). doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0493-4 Google Scholar
  11. Honda M, Inoue J, Yamane S (2009) Influence of low Arctic sea-ice minima on anomalously cold Eurasian winters. Geophys Res Lett 36:L08707. doi:10.1029/2008GL037079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kwok R, Cunningham GF (2008) ICESat over Arctic sea ice: estimation of snow depth and ice thickness. J Geophys Res 113:C08010. doi:10.1029/2008JC004753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rind D, Healy R, Parkinson C, Martinson D (1995). The role of sea ice in 2xCO2 climate model sensitivity. Part I: the total influence of sea ice thickness and extent. J Climate 8:449–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Serreze MC, Holland MM, Stroeve J (2007) Perspectives on the Arctic’s shrinking sea-ice. Science 5818:1533–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simmonds I, Burke C, Keay K (2008) Arctic climate change as manifest in cyclone behavior. J Climate 21(22):5777–5796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stroeve J, Holland MM, Meier W, Scambos T, Serreze M (2007) Arctic sea ice decline: faster than forecast. Geophys Res Lett 34:L09501. doi:10.1029/2007GL029703 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang J, Lindsay R, Steele M, Schweiger A (2008) What drove the dramatic retreat of arctic sea ice during summer 2007. Geophys Res Lett 35:L11505. doi:10.1029/2008GL034005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations