Skip to main content

Implications of twenty-first century climate change on Northeastern United States maple syrup production: impacts and adaptations

Abstract

Previous research on the impacts of maple syrup production in the Northeastern United States has been based on correlative relationships between syrup production and average temperature. Here a simple biologically and physically-based model of sapflow potential is used to assess observed changes in sapflow across the Northeastern US from 1980 to 2006; document the correspondence between these observations and independent downscaled atmosphere ocean general circulation model (AOGCM) simulations of conditions during this period; and quantify changes in sapflow potential through 2100. The sapflow model is able to capture the spatial and temporal (in terms of the start date of sapflow) variations of sapflow that are observed across the Northeast. Likewise the AOGCM simulations reflect the mean number of sapflow days and the timing of sapflow during the 1980–2006 overlap period. Through the twenty-first century, warming winter temperatures will result in a decline in the number of sapflow days if traditional sap collection schedules are maintained. Under the A1fi emissions scenario the number of sapflow days decreases by up to 14 days. However, the changes in climate also translate the optimal timing of sap collection to earlier in the year. Across the region, the time period that maximizes the number of sapflows days becomes as much as 30 days earlier by 2100 under the A1fi emissions scenario. Provided this change is accounted for by modifying the start of the traditional sap collection schedule, there is essentially no net loss of sapflow days across the majority of the region, with a net increase of sapflow days indicated in the extreme north.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Cirelli D, Jagels R, Tyree MT (2008) Toward an improved model of maple sap exudation: the location and role of osmotic barriers in sugar maple, butternut, and white birch. Tree Physiol 28:1145–1155

    Google Scholar 

  2. DeGaetano AT, Belcher BN (2007) Spatial interpolation of daily maximum and minimum air temperature based on meteorological model analyses and independent observations. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46:1981–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Delworth TL, Broccoli AJ, Rosati A, Stouffer RJ, Balaji V, Beesley JA, Cooke WF, Dixon KW, Dunne J, Dunne KA, Durachta JW, Findell KL, Ginoux P, Gnanadesikan A, Gordon CT, Griffies SM, Gudgel R, Harrison MJ, Held IM, Hemler RS, Horowitz LW, Klein SA, Knutson TR, Kushner PJ, Langenhorst AR, Lee H-C, Lin S-J, Lu J, Malyshev SL, Milly PCD, Ramaswamy V, Russell J, Schwarzkopf MD, Shevliakova E, Sirutis JJ, Spelman MJ, Stern WF, Winton M, Wittenberg AT, Wyman B, Zeng F, Zhang R (2006) GFDLs CM2 global coupled climate models. Part 1—formulation and simulation characteristics. J Climate 19:643–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frumhoff PC, McCarthy JJ, Melillo JM, Moser SC, Wuebbles DJ (2007) Confronting climate change in the U.S. Northeast: science, impacts and solutions. Synthesis report of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment (NECIA). Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Cambridge

  5. Heiligmann RB, Koelling MR, Perkins TD (eds) (2006) North American maple syrup producers manual. Ohio State University Press, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ho E, Gough WA (2006) Freeze thaw cycles in Toronto, Canada in a changing climate. Theor Appl Climatol 83:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iverson LR, Prasad AM (2002) Potential tree species shifts with five climate change scenarios in the eastern United States. For Ecol Manag 155:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maclver DC, Karsh M, Comer N, Klaassen J, Auld H, Fenech A (2006) Atmospheric influences on the sugar maple industry of North America. Environment Canada, Adaptation and Impacts Research Division, Occasional Paper 7

  9. Mesinger FG, DiMego E, Kalnay K, Mitchell PC, Shafran W, Ebisuzaki D, Jovic J, Woollen E, Rogers EH, Berbery MB, Ek Y, Fan R, Higgins GW, Li H, Lin Y, Manikin G, Parrish D, Shi W (2006) North American regional reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87:343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, La Rovere E, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Riahi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen S, Victor N, Zhou D (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  11. New England Regional Assessment Group (2001) Preparing for a changing climate, the potential consequences of climate variability and change, New England regional overview. U.S. Global Change Research Program. University of New Hampshire, Durham

  12. Pope VD, Gallani ML, Rowntree PR, Stratton RA (2000) The impact of new physical parameterizations in the Hadley Centre climate model—HadCM3. Clim Dyn 16:123–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rock B, Spencer S (2001) Preparing for a changing climate, the potential consequences of climate variability and change, New England regional overview. U.S. Global Change Research Program. University of New Hampshire, Durham, pp 39–42

  14. Tyree MT, Zimmerman MH (2002) Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  15. Washington WM, Weatherly JW, Meehl GA, Semtner AJ Jr, Bettge TW, Craig AP, Strand WG Jr, Arblaster JM, Wayland VB, James R, Zhang Y (2000) Parallel Climate Model (PCM) control and transient simulations. Clim Dyn 16:755–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wood AW, Maurer EP, Kumar A, Lettenmaier DP (2002) Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States. J Geophys Res 107(D20):4429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wood A, Leung LR, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model surface temperature and precipitation fields. Clim Change 62:189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur T. DeGaetano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skinner, C.B., DeGaetano, A.T. & Chabot, B.F. Implications of twenty-first century climate change on Northeastern United States maple syrup production: impacts and adaptations. Climatic Change 100, 685–702 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9685-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Emission Scenario
  • Maple Sugaring
  • Parallel Climate Model
  • GFDL Model
  • North American Regional Reanalysis