Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives

Abstract

In many countries around the world impacts of climate change are assessed and adaptation options identified. We describe an approach for a qualitative and quantitative assessment of adaptation options to respond to climate change in the Netherlands. The study introduces an inventory and ranking of adaptation options based on stakeholder analysis and expert judgement, and presents some estimates of incremental costs and benefits. The qualitative assessment focuses on ranking and prioritisation of adaptation options. Options are selected and identified and discussed by stakeholders on the basis of a sectoral approach, and assessed with respect to their importance, urgency and other characteristics by experts. The preliminary quantitative assessment identifies incremental costs and benefits of adaptation options. Priority ranking based on a weighted sum of criteria reveals that in the Netherlands integrated nature and water management and risk based policies rank high, followed by policies aiming at ‘climate proof’ housing and infrastructure.

References

  1. Abramovitz J, Banuri T, Girot PO, Orlando B, Schneider N, Spanger-Siegfried E, Switzer J, Hammill A (2002) Adapting to climate change: natural resource management and vulnerability reduction. Background paper to the task force on climate change, adaptation and vulnerable communities. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Manitoba

  2. Bell ML, Hobbs BF, Elliott EM, Ellis H, Robinson Z (2001) An evaluation of multi-criteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 10:229–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brouwer R, van Ek R (2004) Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 50:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burton I, Huq S, Lim B, Pilifosova O, Schipper EL (2002) From impact assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy. Clim Policy 2(2–3):145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Climate Change and Spatial Planning (2008) National research programme on climate change and spatial planning. www.klimaatvoorruimte.nl

  7. DEFRA (2006) The UK’s fourth national communication under the united nations framework convention on climate change. United Kingdom Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, p 135

  8. Dodgson J, Spackman M, Pearman A, Phillips L (2000) Multi-criteria analysis manual. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London. http://www.communities.gov.uk/archived/publications/corporate/multicriteriaanalysismanual

  9. Ebi KL, Burton I (2008) Identifying practical adaptation options: an approach to address climate change-related health risks. Environ Sci Policy 11:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fankhauser S, Smith JB, Tol RSJ (1999) Weathering climate change: some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions. Ecol Econ 30:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Füssel H-M (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change 75(3):301–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gough C, Shackley S (2006) Towards a multi-criteria methodology for assessment of geological carbon storage options. Clim Change 74:141–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Greening LA, Bernow S (2004) Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making. Energy Policy 32:721–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Summary for policymakers, working group II contribution to the intergovernmental panel on climate change, fourth assessment report.

  16. Janssen R, van Herwijnen M (2006) A toolbox for multicriteria decision-making. Int J Environ Technol Manag 6:20–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. KNMI (2003) De toestand van het klimaat in Nederland. KNMI, Bilthoven

    Google Scholar 

  19. KNMI (2006) Climate in the 21st century, four scenarios for the Netherlands. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, Bilthoven

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lemmen DS, Warren FJ, Lacroix J, Bush E (eds) (2008) From impacts to adaptation: Canada in a changing climate 2007. Government of Canada, Ottawa, ON, p 448

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  22. Metroeconomica (2004) Costing the impacts of climate change in the UK: overview of guidelines. UKCIP technical report. UKCIP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  23. MMM (2005) Finland’s national strategy for adaptation to climate change. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland, Helsinki, pp 281. http://www.mmm.fi/fi/index/etusivu/ymparisto/ilmastopolitiikka/ilmastomuutos.html

  24. Munda G, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (1994) Qualitative multicriteria evaluation for environmental management. Ecol Econ 10:97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. RIVM (2004) Milieubalans 2004. Het Nederlandse milieu verklaard. RIVM rapport 251701057. Bilthoven, the Netherlands, p 200

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rooijers F, de Keizer I, Slingerland S, Faber J, Wit RCN, Verbeek J, van Dorland R, van Ulden AP, Hutjes R, Kabat P, van Ierland EC (2004) Klimaatverandering klimaatbeleid. Inzicht in keuzes voor de Tweede Kamer. Hoofdrapport September 2004. Rapport 3748

  27. Rosenzweig C, Major DC, Demong K, Stanton C, Horton R, Stults M (2007) Managing climate change risks in New York city’s water system: assessment and adaptation planning. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 12:1391–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smit B, Pilifosova O (2003) From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reduction. In: Smith JB, Klein RJT, Huq S (eds) Climate change, adaptive capacity and development. Imperial College, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smit B, Burton I, Klein RJT, Street R (1999) The science of adaptation: a framework for assessment. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 4:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smit B, Pilifosova O, Burton I, Challenger B, Huq S, Klein R, Yohe G (2001) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  31. Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change. The Stern review. www.sternreview.org.uk

  32. Tol RSJ, Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ (2008) Towards successful adaptation to sea-level rise along Europe’s coasts. J Coast Res 24(2):432–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. UNDP (2005) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change. Developing strategies, policies and measures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

    Google Scholar 

  34. UNFCCC (1997) Kyoto protocol to the united nations framework convention on climate change

  35. UNFCCC (2007) National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs). http://unfccc.int/national_reports/napa/items/2719.php

  36. Van Ierland EC, de Bruin K, Dellink RB, Ruijs A (eds) (2007) A qualitative assessment of climate adaptation options and some estimates of adaptation costs. Reports on the Routeplanner projects 3, 4 and 5 (Routeplanner deelprojecten 3, 4 en 5), Wageningen UR. Available at www.enr.wur.nl/UK/Routeplanner+Report

  37. Willows RI, Connell RK (eds) (2003) Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty and decision making. UKCIP Technical Report. UKCIP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. C. van Ierland.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Bruin, K., Dellink, R.B., Ruijs, A. et al. Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Climatic Change 95, 23–45 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9576-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spatial Planning
  • Adaptation Option
  • Adaptation Policy
  • Institutional Complexity
  • National Research Programme