Skip to main content

Making a difference on the ground: the challenge of demonstrating the effectiveness of decision support

Abstract

Decision support has become a popular concept, especially in the context of climate change. Government agencies and researchers increasingly recognize that they should provide it, and resource managers and policy-makers increasingly need and demand it. This demand will only grow as climate change progresses. Those who will attempt to meet this growing demand will need to demonstrate “effectiveness”. This editorial raises a number of critical questions that need to be answered in the course of evaluating whether decision support is effective. The answers, if carefully considered early on, may help to design processes that may in fact produce more useable products, facilitate their use, and ultimately create intended and desirable outcomes.

References

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. JAIP 35:216–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Beierle TC (1998) Public participation in environmental decisions: an evaluation framework using social goals. Resources for the Future. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Beierle TC (2004) The benefits and costs of disclosing information about risks: what do we know about right-to-know? Risk Anal 24:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (1999) Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and management systems. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M (1999) The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Sci Technol Soc 4:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. PNAS 100:8086–8091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, Crutzen PJ, Schellnhuber H-J (2004) Science for global sustainability. In: Schnellnhuber HJ (ed) Earth system analysis for sustainability. MIT, Cambridge, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, Mitchell RB, Cash DW (2006) Evaluating the influence of global environmental assessments. In: Mitchell RB, Clark WC, Cash DW, Dickson N (eds) Global environmental assessments: information and influence. MIT, Cambridge, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Climate Change Science Program, Subcommittee on Global Change Research (2003) Strategic plan for the U.S. climate change science program. CCSP, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke B, Kothari U (eds) (2001) Participation: the new tyranny? Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JL (2005) The public participation handbook: making better decisions through citizen involvement. Wiley, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing MK (2003) Public participation in environmental decision-making. GDRC, Koyto

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell A, Jäger J (eds) (2006) Assessments of regional and global environmental risks. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino DJ (1990) Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci Technol Human Values 15:226–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2004) Traditional knowledge in social-ecological systems. Ecology & Society 9:7. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art7/

  • Gethmann CF (2005) Participation als Modus sozialer Selbstorganisation? Einige kritische Fragen. [Participation as a form of social self organization? Some critical questions]. Gaia 14:32–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M (1999) Science’s new social contract with society. Nature 402:C81–C84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guston DH (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci Technol Human Values 26:87–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs H (2005) Partizipationsforschung und nachhaltige Entwicklung. [Research on participation and sustainable development]. Gaia 14:30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey S, Mohan G (eds) (2005) Participation–from tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (1990) The fifth branch: science advisors as policymakers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (ed) (2004) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson RE (2006) Rerouting the stakeholder express. Glob Environ Change 16:320–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) (1992) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KN (1993) Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279:491–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus GB, Chess C, Shannon MA (2005) Political perspectives on public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Discussion paper prepared for the NRC public participation in environmental assessments and decision-making panel meeting, Washington, DC, February 2005. NRC, Washington, DC

  • Mayoux L (2007) Participatory Development. Available at http://www.lindaswebs.org.uk/Page1_Development/Participation/Participation.htm

  • McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 10:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles EL, Snover AK, Whitely Binder LC, Sarachik ES, Mote PW, Mantua N (2006) An approach to designing a national climate service. PNAS 103:19616–19623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RB, Clark WC, Cash DW, Dickson N (eds) (2006) Global environmental assessments: information, and influence. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC (2005) Stakeholder involvement in the first U.S. national assessment of the potential consequences of climate variability and change: an evaluation, finally. Research report prepared for National Research Council, Committee on Human Dimensions of Global Change. NCAR, Boulder, CO

  • Moser SC (2006) Climate change and sea-level rise in Maine and Hawai’i: the changing tides of an issue domain. In: Mitchell RB, Clark WC, Cash DW, Dickson N (eds) Global environmental assessments: information, and influence. MIT, Cambridge, pp 201–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Dilling L (2004) Making climate hot: communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment 46:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Dilling L (eds) (2007) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2007) Evaluating progress of the U.S. climate change science program: methods and preliminary results. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Newig J (2007) Does public participation in environmental decisions lead to improved environmental quality?. CCP (Communication, Cooperation, Participation. Research and Practice for a sustainable Future) 1:51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Rethinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver P (2002) Natural resource and environmental management partnerships: panacea, placebo or palliative? In: National Coastal Management ‘Coast to Coast’ Conference. Tweed Heads, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl C (2005) Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures 37:1159–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner S, Lach D, Ingram H (2005) Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Clim Change 69:197–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Human Values 25:3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter S, Rhoades G (2005) From “endless frontier” to “basic science for use”: social contracts between science and society. Sci Technol Human Values 30:536–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer LC et al (2006) Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology & Society 11:39. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss32/art39/

  • van Kerkhoff L (2005) Integrated research: concepts of connection in environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Policy 8:452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Ann Rev Environ Res 31:12.11–12.33

    Google Scholar 

  • Visbeck M (2007) From climate assessment to climate services. Nat Geosci 1:2–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Moser.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moser, S. Making a difference on the ground: the challenge of demonstrating the effectiveness of decision support. Climatic Change 95, 11 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9539-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9539-1

Keywords

  • Decision Support
  • Public Participation
  • Provide Decision Support
  • Future Research Agenda
  • Decision Support Process