Climatic Change

, Volume 95, Issue 1–2, pp 103–119 | Cite as

International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change



This article explores international governance issues related to a possible future use of geoengineering techniques. Despite the serious arguments against geoengineering, policy-makers may start to take an interest in it in the medium term. The article identifies non-technical characteristics of geoengineering which might influence governance models, and then discusses three broad approaches: through the United Nations, by one state unilaterally, and through a consortium of states. An examination of international legal instruments reveals none that would pose an insuperable barrier to geoengineering. Finally, the article argues for early exploration of the technological, environmental, political and regulatory issues raised by geoengineering, to maximize the chances of good, science-based multilateral decision making if and when geoengineering’s day arrives.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angel R (2006) Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange pont (L1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(46):17184–17189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett S (2003) Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. Bengtsson L (2006) Geo-Engineering to confine climate change: is it at all feasible? Clim Change 77:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodansky D (1996) May we engineer the climate? Clim Change 33:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (2003) Charter for the carbon sequestration leadership forum: a carbon capture and storage technology initiative. Available at Signed 25 June 2003.
  6. Chayes A, Chayes AH (1993) On compliance. Int Organ 47–42:175–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cicerone RJ (2006) Geoengineering: encouraging research and overseeing implementation. Clim Change 77:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crutzen PJ (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma. Clim Change 77:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. The Economist (2008) A changing climate of opinion. The Economist, 6 September 2008Google Scholar
  10. Govindasamy B, Caldiera K, Duffy PB (2002) Geoengineering earth’s radiation balance to mitigate climate change from a quadrupling of CO2. Glob Planet Change 37:157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hass PM (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 46:1–35 Winter 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IPCC (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. International Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  13. IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Summary for policy-makers. (Working group 2 contribution to the fourth assessment report.) International Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  14. IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change. Summary for policy-makers. (Working group 3 contribution to the fourth assessment report.) International Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  15. Jamieson D (1996) Ethics and intentional climate change. Clim Change 33:323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keith DW (2000) Geoengineering the climate: history and prospect. Ann Rev Energy Environ 25:245–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keohane RO (1984) After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawrence MG (2006) Geoengineering: to speak or not to speak? Clim Change 77:245–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levy MA, Haas PM, Keohane RO (1992) Institutions for the Earth: promoting international environmental protection. Environment 34:12–17Google Scholar
  20. Lovelock J (2006) The revenge of Gaia. Allen Lane, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Lunt DJ, Ridgwell A, Valdes PJ, Seale A (2008) “Sunshade world”: a fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 35:L12710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacCracken MC (2006) Geoengineering: worthy of cautious evaluation? Clim Change 77:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Merrill TW (1997) Golden rules for transboundary pollution. Duke Law J 46:932–934, 958–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Michaelson J (1998) Geoengineering: a climate change Manhattan project. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, Stanford CA, January 1998Google Scholar
  25. Schelling TC (1996) The economic diplomacy of geoengineering. Clim Change 33:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schelling TC (2005) An astonishing sixty years: the legacy of Hiroshima. Nobel Prize Lecture, 8 December 2005Google Scholar
  27. Schneider SH (1996) Geoengineering: could—or should—we do it? Clim Change 33:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneider SH (2001) Earth systems engineering and management. Nature 409:417–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schweickart RL (2003) The need for a United Nations asteroid deflection treaty to establish a system for trustworthy mission design and execution. B612 Foundation Occasional Paper 0301. Houston, TexasGoogle Scholar
  30. Stern N (2006) Stern review on the economics of climate change. HM Treasury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Teller E, Hyde R, Ishikawa M, Nuckolls J, Wood L (2004) Active climate stabilization: presently-feasible albedo-control approaches to prevention of both types of climate change (presentation to a symposium held in Cambridge, England on 7–9 January 2004)Google Scholar
  32. Thompson A (2006) Management under anarchy: the international politics of climate change. Clim Change 78:11, 7–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tilmes S, Muller R, Salawitch R (2008) The sensitivity of polar ozone depletion to proposed geoengineering schemes. Science 320:1201–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weiss C (2006) Can there be science-based precaution? Environ Res Lett, 30 October 2006Google Scholar
  35. Wigley TM (2006) A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization. Science 314:452–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Crisis GroupJakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations