Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?

Abstract

While there is a recognised need to adapt to changing climatic conditions, there is an emerging discourse of limits to such adaptation. Limits are traditionally analysed as a set of immutable thresholds in biological, economic or technological parameters. This paper contends that limits to adaptation are endogenous to society and hence contingent on ethics, knowledge, attitudes to risk and culture. We review insights from history, sociology and psychology of risk, economics and political science to develop four propositions concerning limits to adaptation. First, any limits to adaptation depend on the ultimate goals of adaptation underpinned by diverse values. Second, adaptation need not be limited by uncertainty around future foresight of risk. Third, social and individual factors limit adaptation action. Fourth, systematic undervaluation of loss of places and culture disguises real, experienced but subjective limits to adaptation. We conclude that these issues of values and ethics, risk, knowledge and culture construct societal limits to adaptation, but that these limits are mutable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adger WN, Barnett J, Ellemor H (2009) Unique and valued places at risk. In: Schneider SH, Rosencranz A, Mastrandrea M (eds) Climate change science and policy. Island, Washington DC (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawala S, Fankhauser S (eds) (2008) Economic aspects of adaptation to climate change: costs, benefits and policy instruments. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  3. Apuuli B, Wright J, Elias C, Burton I (2000) Reconciling national and global priorities in adaptation to climate change: with an illustration from Uganda. Environ Monit Assess 61:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnell NW, Delaney EK (2006) Adapting to climate change: water supply in England and Wales. Clim Change 78:227–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baer P (2007) The worth of an ice-sheet: a critique of the treatment of catastrophic impacts in the Stern review. EcoEquity Discussion Paper. www.ecoequity.org/docs/WorthOfAnIceSheet.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2007

  6. Baker ARH (1992) Introduction: on ideology and landscape. In: Baker ARH, Biger G (eds) Ideology and landscape in historical perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berkes F (2002) Epilogue: making sense of Arctic environmental change? In: Krupnik I, Jolly D (eds) The earth is faster now: indigenous observations of arctic environmental change. Arctic Research Consortium of the United States and Smithsonian Institution, Fairbanks AK, pp 335–349

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berkhout F, Hertin J, Gann DM (2006) Learning to adapt: organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Clim Change 78:135–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berman M, Kofinas G (2004) Hunting for models: grounded and rational choice approaches to analyzing climate effects on subsistence hunting in an Arctic community. Ecol Econ 49:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1993) The environment as hazard, 2nd edn. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Camfield L, McGregor A (2005) Resilience and well-being in developing countries. In: Ungar M (ed) Handbook for working with children and youth: pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jager J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. PNAS 100:8086–8091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multi-level world. Ecology and Society 11(2):8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cruikshank J (2001) Glaciers and climate change: perspectives from oral tradition. Arctic 54:377–393

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dessai S, Hulme M (2004) Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities? Climate Policy 4:107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dessai S, Adger WN, Hulme M, Turnpenny J, Köhler J, Warren R (2004) Defining and experiencing dangerous climate change. Clim Change 64:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dessai S, Hulme M, Lempert RJ, Pielke R Jr (2009) Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation? In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Diamond J (2005) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or survive. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dobson A (2003) Citizenship and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Dow K, Kasperson RE, Bohn H (2006) Exploring the social justice implications of adaptation and vulnerability. In: Adger WN, Paavola J, Huq S, Mace MJ (eds) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 79–96

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eakin H, Tompkins EL, Nelson DR, Anderies JM (2009) Hidden costs and disparate uncertainties: trade-offs involved in approaches to climate policy. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Few R, Brown K, Tompkins E (2007) Climate change and coastal management decisions: insights from Christchurch Bay, UK. Coast Manage 35:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fischlin A, Midgeley G (2007) Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Hanson CE, van der Linden PJ (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  25. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fransson N, Gärling T (1999) Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. J Environ Psychol 19:369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Füssel H-M (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches and key lessons. Sustainability Science 2:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gagnon-Lebrun F, Agrawala S (2007) Implementing adaptation in developed countries: an analysis of progress and trends. Climate Policy 7:392–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gallopin GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 16:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gordon LJ, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2008) Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. Trends Ecol Evol 23:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gow P (1995) Land, people, and paper in Western Amazonia. In: Hirsch E, O’Hanlon M (eds) The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Harley TA (2003) Nice weather for the time of year: the British obsession with the weather. In: Strauss S, Orlove B (eds) Weather, climate, culture. Berg, Oxford, pp 103–120

    Google Scholar 

  35. Henshaw A (2003) Climate and culture in the North: the interface of archaeology, paleoenvironmental science and oral history. In: Strauss S, Orlove B (eds) Weather, climate, culture. Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hines JM, Hungerford HR, Tomera AN (1987) Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behaviour: a meta-analysis. J Environ Educ 18:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  37. Horton D (2005) Demonstrating environmental citizenship? In: Dobson A, Bell DR (eds) Environmental citizenship. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hulme M, Dessai S (2008) Negotiating future climates for public policy: a critical assessment of the development of climate scenarios for the UK. Environ Sci Policy 11:54–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hulme M, Jenkins GJ, Lu X, Turnpenny JR, Mitchell TD, Jones RG, Lowe J, Murphy JM, Hassell D, Boorman P, McDonald R, Hill S (2002) Climate change scenarios for the UK: the UKCIP02 scientific report. Tyndall, Norwich, 112 pp

  40. Huntington E (1915, 2001) Civilisation and climate. Reprinted by the University Press of the Pacific, Hawaii, Hawaii, 333 pp

    Google Scholar 

  41. Huntington H, Fox S (2005) The changing arctic: indigenous perspectives. In: Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  42. Inglehart R (1997) Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in forty three societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jackson T (2005) Motivating sustainable consumption—a review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. A report to the sustainable development research network. Centre for Environmental Strategies, University of Surrey

  44. Kates RW, Wilbanks TJ (2003) Making the global local: responding to climate change concerns from the ground up. Environment 45(3):12–23

    Google Scholar 

  45. Knopman DS (2006) Success matters: recasting the relationship among geophysical, biological, and behavioral scientists to support decision making on major environmental challenges. Water Resour Res 42(3):W03S09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lempert RJ, Groves DG, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2006) A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manag Sci 52:514–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lord CG et al (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effect of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 37:2098–2109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McCarthy JJ, Canziani O, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. IPCC working group II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  49. McIntosh RJ, Tainter JA, McIntosh SK (eds) (2000) The way the wind blows: climate, history and human action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mearns LO, Hulme M, Carter TR, Lal M, Leemans R, Whetton PH (2001) Climate scenario development. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of WG1 to the IPCC third assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 739–768, 944 pp

    Google Scholar 

  51. Moser SC, Dilling L (2004) Making climate hot. Communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment 46(10):32–46

    Google Scholar 

  52. Moser S, Dilling L (eds) (2007) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 549 pp

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Neumayer E (2007) A missed opportunity: the stern review on climate change fails to tackle the issue of non-substitutable loss of natural capital. Glob Environ Change 17:297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nilsson A, von Borgstede C, Biel A (2004) Willingness to accept climate change strategies: the effect of values and norms. J Environ Psychol 24:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Norton BG (2003) Searching for sustainability: interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nye M, Burgess J (2008) Promoting durable change in household waste and energy use behaviour. A research report completed for the department for environment, food and rural affairs. School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

    Google Scholar 

  58. O’Brien K (2009) Climate change and values: do changing values define the limits to successful adaptation? In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  59. O’Brien KL, Leichenko RM (2000) Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Glob Environ Change 10(3):221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. O’Brien KL, Leichenko RM, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Glob Environ Change 14(4):303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. O’Brien KL, Eriksen S, Sygna L, Naess LO (2006) Questioning complacency: climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. Ambio 35(2):50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Oliver-Smith A (1991) Involuntary resettlement, resistance, and political empowerment. J Refug Stud 4(2):132–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. O’Neill BC, Oppenheimer M (2002) Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto protocol. Science 296:1971–1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Oppenheimer M (2005) Defining dangerous anthropogenic interference: the role of science, the limits of science. Risk Anal 25:1399–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. O’Riordan T, Jordan A (1999) Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Glob Environ Change 9:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Orlove BS, Chiang JCH et al (2000) Forecasting Andean rainfall and crop yield from the influence of El Nino on Pleiades visibility. Nature 403:68–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  68. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Parry M, Arnell NW, Hulme M, Nicholls R, Livermore M (1998) Adapting to the inevitable. Nature 395:741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Parson EA et al (2007) Global change scenarios: their development and use. Synthesis and assessment Product 2.1b. US Climate Science Program, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  71. Paton D, Millar M, Johnston D (2001) Community resilience to volcanic hazard consequences. Natural Hazards 24:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Petersen AC (2006) Simulating nature: a philosophical study of computer-simulation uncertainties and their role in climate science and policy advice. Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam, 220 pp

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pielke R, Prins G, Rayner S, Sarewitz D (2007) Climate change 2007: lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 445:597–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Plummer R, Armitage D (2007) A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecol Econ 61:62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Pretty J (2007) The earth only endures. Earthscan, London, 240 pp

    Google Scholar 

  76. Pulver S, VanDeveer S (2007) Global environmental futures interrogating the practice and politics of scenarios background paper presented at conference “Global environmental futures—interrogating the practice and politics of scenarios,” Providence, RI, March 23–24, 2007

  77. Rachlinski JJ (2000) The psychology of global climate change. Univ Ill Law Rev 1:299–319

    Google Scholar 

  78. Rappaport RA (1977) Maladaptation in social systems. In: Friedman J (ed) Evolution of social systems. London, Duckworth, pp 49–71

    Google Scholar 

  79. Riedlinger D, Berkes F (2001) Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record 37:315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Scheffer M, Brovkin V, Cox P (2006) Positive feedback between global warming and atmospheric CO2 concentration inferred from past climate change. Geophys Res Lett 33:L10702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) (2006) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  82. Schneider SH, Semenov S, Patwardhan A et al (2007) Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Hanson CE, van der Linden PJ (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  83. Smit B, Pilifosova O (2001) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In: McCarthy JJ (ed) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. IPCC working group II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 877–912

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sobel RS, Leeson PT (2006) Government’s response to Hurricane Katrina: a public choice analysis. Public Choice 127:55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Spaargaren G, van Vliet B (2000) Lifestyle, consumption and the environment: the ecological modernisation of domestic consumption. Soc Nat Resour 9:50–76

    Google Scholar 

  86. Stern N (2007) Economics of climate change: the stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  87. Stoll-Kleemann S, O’Riordan T, Jaeger CC (2001) The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups. Glob Environ Change 11:107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Strauss S, Orlove B (2003) Up in the air: the anthropology of weather and climate. In: Strauss S, Orlove B (eds) Weather, climate, culture. Berg, Oxford, pp 3–16, 307 pp

    Google Scholar 

  89. Thomas DSG, Twyman C, Osbahr H, Hewitson B (2007) Adapting to climate change and variability in southern Africa: farmer responses to intra-seasonal precipitation trends in South Africa. Clim Change 83:301–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Toman M (2006) Values in the economics of climate change. Environ Values 15:365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Tompkins EL, Boyd E, Nicholson-Cole SA, Weatherhead K, Arnell WN, Adger WN (2005) Linking adaptation research and practice. A report submitted to DEFRA as part of the climate change impacts and adaptation cross-regional research programme. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  92. Tompkins EL, Few R, Brown K (2008) Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. J Environ Manag 88:1580–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Tonn B, Hemrick A, Conrad F (2006) Cognitive representations of the future: survey results. Futures 38:810–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Trudelle-Schwarz M (1996) Unravelling the Anchoring Cord: Navajo Relocation, 1974 to 1996. Am Anthropol 99(1):43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Tsimplis MN, Woolf DK, Osborn TJ et al (2005) Towards a vulnerability assessment of the UK and northern European coasts: the role of regional climate variability. Philos Trans Royal Soc Math, Phys Eng Sci 363:1329–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Turner NJ, Gregory R, Brooks C, Failing L, Satterfield T (2008) From invisibility to transparency: identifying the implications. Ecol Soc 13(2):7. URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art7/

    Google Scholar 

  97. Vaughan DG, Marshall GJ, Connolley WM, Parkinson C, Mulvaney R, Hodgson DA, King JC, Pudsey CJ, Turner J (2003) Recent rapid regional climate warming on the Antarctic Peninsula. Clim Change 60:243–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Vedwan N, Rhoades RE (2001) Climate change in the Western Himalayas of India: a study of local perception and response. Clim Res 19:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Whitmarsh L (2008) Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J Risk Res 11(3):351–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Wolf J, Lorenzoni I, Few R, Abrahmson V, Raine R (2009) Conceptual and practical barriers to adaptation: an interdisciplinary analysis of vulnerability and response to heat waves in the UK. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  101. Yohe GW (2001) Mitigative capacity—the mirror image of adaptive capacity on the emissions side. Clim Change 49:247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Young KR, Lipton JK (2006) Adaptive governance and climate change in the tropical highlands of Western South America. Clim Change 78:63–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Neil Adger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adger, W.N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M. et al. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?. Climatic Change 93, 335–354 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Future Climate
  • Climate Policy
  • Climate Change Adaptation
  • Glob Environ Change
  • Adaptation Decision