Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 94, Issue 3–4, pp 319–331 | Cite as

Sustainable agriculture and the production of biomass for energy use

  • Adrian MullerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Modern bioenergy is seen as a promising option to curb greenhouse gas emissions. There is, however, a potential competition for land and water between bioenergy and food crops. Another question is whether biomass for energy use can be produced in a sustainable manner given the current conventional agricultural production practices. Other than the land and water competition, this question is often neglected in scenarios to meet a significant part of global energy demand with bioenergy. In the following, I address this question. There are sustainable alternatives, for example organic agriculture, to avoid the negative environmental effects of conventional agriculture. Yet, meeting a significant part of global energy demand with biomass grown sustainably may not be possible, as burning significant quantities of organic matter—inherent in bioenergy use—is likely to be incompatible with the principles of such alternatives, which often rely on biomass input for nutrient balance. There may therefore be a trade-off between policies and practices to increase bioenergy and those to increase sustainability in agriculture via practices such as organic farming. This is not a general critique of bioenergy but it points to additional potential dangers of modern bioenergy as a strategy to meet significant parts of world energy demand.

Keywords

Biomass Biogas Organic Agriculture Clean Development Mechanism Conventional Agriculture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AgroEco (2006) AgroEco presented at the Climate Conference in Montreal, 2005. http://www.agroeco.nl/project.php?i=63, or at Biofach 2006 (.../project.php?i=65). Accessed 11 April 2008
  2. Azar C (2004) Emerging scarcities—bioenergy-food competition in a carbon constrained world. In: Simpson D, Toman M, Ayres R (eds) Scarcity and growth in the new millennium, resources for the future. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  3. Badgley C, Moghtader J, Quintero E, Zakem E, Chappell M, Avilez-Vazquez K, Samulon A, Perfecto I (2007) Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renew Agric Food Syst 22(2):86–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berndes G (2002) Bioenergy and water—the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply. Glob Environ Change 12:253–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berndes G, Hoogwijk M, van den Broek R (2003) The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies. Biomass Bioenergy 25:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhat PR, Chanakya HN, Ravindranath NH (2001) Biogas plant dissemination: success story of Sirsi, India. Energy Sustain Dev V(1):39–46Google Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya SC, Abdul Salam P, Palm HL, Ravindranathan NH (2003) Sustainable biomass production for energy in selected Asian countries. Biomass Bioenergy 25:471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bringezu S, Ramesohl S, Arnold K, Fischedick M, von Geibler J, Liedtke C, Schütz H (2007) Towards a sustinable biomass strategy. Wuppertal Paper 163, Wuppertal InstituteGoogle Scholar
  9. DARCOF (2007) Biomass and bioenergy-production in organic agriculture, Research project under the programme DARCOF III. http://www.darcof.dk/research/darcofiii/bioconcens.html. Accessed 11 April 2008
  10. De Oliveira MED, Vaughan BE, Rykiel Jr EJ (2005) Ethanol as fuel: energy, carbon dioxide balances, and ecological footprint. BioScience 55(7):593–602 (a critical commentary by Azar C, Berndes G, Hanson J, Grahn M is given in BioScience 56(1):5)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delucchi MA (2005) A multi-country analysis of lifecycle emissions from transportation fuels and motor vehicles. Publication No. UCD-ITS-RR-05-10, Davis, CA: ITS, University of California at Davis. http://www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2005/UCD-ITS-RR-05-10.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  12. Delucchi MA (2006) Life cycle analysis of biofuels. Draft Manuscript, Davis, CA: ITS, University of California at Davis. http://www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2006/UCD-ITS-RR-06-08.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  13. DFID (2004) Agricultural sustainability. Working Paper Nr. 12, UK Department of International Development (DFID), London. http://dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org/summaries/wp12.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  14. Drinkwater LE, Wagoner P, Sarrantonio M (1998) Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396:262–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dworak T, Eppler U, Petersen JE, Schlegel S, Laaser C (2007) WFD and bioenergy production at the EU Level - a review of the possible impact of biomass production from agriculture on water. Background Paper for the conference “WFD meets CAP—Looking for a consistent approach”, Paris. http://www.ecologic-events.de/cap-wfd/en/background.htm. Accessed 9 April 2008
  16. EEA (2006) How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment? EEA Report 7/2006, European Environmental AgencyGoogle Scholar
  17. EEA (2007) Estimating the environmentally compatible bioenergy potential from agriculture, EEA Technical Report 12/2007, European Environmental AgencyGoogle Scholar
  18. EU (2003) Directive 2003/30/EC of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport, O.J. L123, 17/05/2003. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/legislation/doc/biofuels/en_final.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  19. EU (2005) Biomass action plan, Communication from the Commission, COM(2005) 628, Commission of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/biomass_action_plan/doc/2005_12_07_comm_biomass_action_plan_en.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  20. Evenson RE, Gollin D (2003) Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960–2000. Science 300:758–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eyhorn F, Heeb M, Weidmann G (2003) IFOAM training manual for organic agriculture in the tropics. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). http://www.fibl.org/english/ publications/training-manual/. Accessed 11 April 2008
  22. Eyhorn F (2007) Organic farming for sustinable livelihoods in developing countries? The case of cotton in India, vdf Hochschulverlag, ETH Zürich, Switzerland. An earlier electronic version (PhD thesis 2006). http://www.zb.unibe.ch/download/eldiss/06eyhorn_f.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  23. FAO (2002a) El-Hage Scialabba N, Hattam C (eds) Organic agriculture, environment and food security. Food and agriculture organisation of the United Nations FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4137e/y4137e00.htm. Accessed 11 April 2008
  24. FAO (2002b) World agriculture, towards 2015/2030. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/y3557e/y3557e00.htm. Accessed 11 April 2008
  25. FAO (2003) Greening agriculture in India—an overview of opportunities and constraints. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations FAO. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/ARTICLE/AGRIPPA/658_en00.htm. Accessed 11 April 2008
  26. FAO (2004) Unified Bioenergy Terminology UBET. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations FAO. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/007/j4504E/j4504E00.HTM. Accessed 11 April 2008
  27. FAO (2006) FAO Statistical Yearbook, Vol. 1. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations FAO. http://www.fao.org/statistics/yearbook/vol_1_1/index.asp. Accessed 11 April 2008
  28. Francis G, Edinger R, Becker K (2005) A concept for simultaneous wasteland reclamation, fuel production, and socio-economic development in degraded areas in India: need, potential and perspectives of Jatropha plantations. Nat Res Forum 29:12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fritsche UR, Hünecke K, Hermann A, Schulze F, Wiegman K (2006) Sustainability standards for bioenergy. WWF Germany, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. Giampietro M, Ulgiati S (1997) Feasibility of large-scale biofuel production. BioScience 47(9):587–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gielen DJ, de Feber MAPC, Bos AJM, Gerlag T (2001) Biomass for energy or materials? A Western European systems engineering perspective. Energy Policy 29:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldemberg J, Coelho ST (2004) Renewable energy—traditional biomass vs. modern biomass. Energy Policy 32:711–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Halberg N, Sulser, TB Hoegh-Jensen H, Rosegrant MW, Knudsen MT (2006) The impact of organic farming on food security in a regional and global perspective. In: Halberg N, Alroe HF, Knudsen MT, Kristensen ES (eds) Global development of organic agriculture: challenges and prospects. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoogwijk M, Faaij A, van den Broek R, Berndes G, Gielen D, Turkenberg W (2003) Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy. Biomass Bioenergy 25:119–133Google Scholar
  35. Hoogwijk M, Faaij A, Eickhout B, De Vries B, Turkenburg W (2005) Potential of biomass energy out to 2100 for 4 IPCC SRES land-use scenarios. Biomass Bioenergy 29:225–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. IFAD (2001) Rural Poverty Report 2001: The challenge of ending rural poverty. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). http://www.ifad.org/poverty/. Accessed 11 April 2008
  37. IFOAM (2006a) Side event to the 24th session of the subsidiary bodies, 24th May 2006. http://regserver.unfccc.int/seors/reports/archive.html?session_id=SB24. Accessed 11 April 2008; http://regserver.unfccc.int/seors/file_storage/ nz4xyif4q78v67j.pdf
  38. IFOAM (2006b) The principles of organic agriculture. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). http://www.ifoam.org/about_ifoam/principles/index.html. Accessed 11 April 2008
  39. IFOAM (2007) Organic agriculture’s role in countering climate change. http://www.ifoam.org/organic_facts/benefits/pdfs/climate_change_english.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  40. IFPRI (2006) Hazell P and Pachauri RK (eds) Bioenergy and agriculture: promises and challenges. Focus 14, Vision 2020, The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). http://www.ifpri.org/2020/focus/focus14.asp. Accessed 11 April 2008
  41. IPCC (2007) Summary for policy makers, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). http://www.ipcc-wg2.org/index.html. Accessed 11 April 2008
  42. IPCC (2008) Technical paper on climate change and water. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/session28/doc13.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  43. Jorgensen U, Dalgaar T, Kristensen ES (2005) Biomass energy in organic farming—the potential role of short rotation coppice. Biomass Bioenergy 28(2):237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kartha S, Leach G (2001) Using modern bioenergy to reduce rural poverty. Report prepared to the Shell Foundation, Stockholm Environmental Institute.Google Scholar
  45. Kimmins JP (1997) Predicting sustainability of forest bioenergy production in the face of changing paradigms. Biomass Bioenergy 13(4/5):201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Koopmans A (2005). Biomass energy demand and supply for South and South-East Asia—assessing the resource base. Biomass Bioenergy 28:133–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kotschi J, Müller-Sämann K (2004) The role of organic agriculture in mitigating climate change A scoping study. IFOAM. http://shop.ifoam.org/bookstore/download_preview/ClimateStudy_Intro.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  48. Krotscheck C, König F, Obernberger I (2000) Ecological assessment of integrated bioenergy systems using the sustinable process index. Biomass Bioenergy 18:341–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lewandowski I, Faaij APC (2006) Steps towards the development of a certification system for sustainable bio-energy trade. Biomass Bioenergy 30(2):83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lysen E, van Egmond S (eds) (2008) Biomass assessment—assessment of global biomass potentials and their links to food, water, biodiversity, energy demand and economy. Report 500102 012, Netherlands Research Programme on Scientific Assessment and Policy Analysis for Climate Change (WAB). http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/500102012.pdf. Accessed 22 August 2008
  51. Maeder P, Fliessbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moffat AJ (2003) Indicators of soil quality for UK forestry. Forestry 76(5):547–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Niggli U, Fliessbach A, Hepperly P, Scialabba N (2008) Low greenhouse gas agriculture: mitigation and adaptation potential of sustainable farming systems, FAO (similar: Niggli U, Fliessbach A, Schmid H, Kasterine A (2007) organic farming and climate change. International Trade Center UNCTAD/WTO, Geneva).Google Scholar
  55. NYT (2007) Thousands in Mexico City protest rising food prices. New York Times, February 1Google Scholar
  56. Odlare M, Pell M (2008) Effect of wood fly ash and compost on nitrification and denitrification in agricultural soil. Applied Energy 86:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paine LK, Peterson TL, Undersander DJ, Rineer KC, Bartelt GA, Temple SA, Sample DW, Klemme RM (1996) Some ecological and socio-economic considerations for biomass energy crop production. Biomass Bioenergy 10(4):231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parikka M (2004) Global biomass fuel resources. Biomass Bioenergy 27:613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parrott N, Marsden T (2002) The real green revolution. Organic and agroecological farming in the south. Greenpeace Environmental Trust, London. http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/MultimediaFiles/Live/FullReport/4526.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  60. Pimentel D (2003) Ethanol fuels: energy balance, economics, and environmental impacts are negative. Nat Resour Res 12(2):127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pretty JN, Noble AD, Bossio D, Dixon J, Hine RE, Penning de Vries F, Morison J (2006) Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. Environ Sci Technol 40(4):1114–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rajagopal D, Zilberman D (2007) Review of environmental, economic and policy aspects of biofuels. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4341Google Scholar
  63. Reijnders L (2006) Conditions for the sustainability of biomass based fuel use. Energy Policy 34:863–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rundgren G (2008) Best practices for organic policy, report prepared under the CBTF project “Promoting Production and Trading Opportunities for Organic Agricultural Products in East Africa”, UNEP-UNCTADGoogle Scholar
  65. Sanders J (2007) Economic impact of agricultural liberalisation policies on organic farming in Switzerland. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  66. Scharlemann JPW, Laurence WF (2008) How green are biofuels? Science 139:43–44 (based on Zah et al. 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith CT (1995) Environmental consequences of intensive harvesting. Biomass Bioenergy 9(1):161–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tilman D (1997) The greening of the green revolution. Nature 396:211–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ulgiati S (2001) A comprehensive energy and economic assessment of biofuels: When “Green” is not enough. Crit Rev Plant Sci 20(1):71–106Google Scholar
  70. UNDP (2000) Bioenergy primer, United Nations Development Program UNDP. http://www.undp.org/energy/publications/2000/2000b.htm. Accessed 6 April 2008
  71. UNEP (2000) Global environment outlook 2000 - GEO-2000, United Nations Environment Program UNEP. http://www.unep.org/geo2000/english/index.htm. Accessed 11 April 2008
  72. UNEP (2002) Vital water graphics, United Nations Environment Program UNEP. http://www.unep.org/dewa/assessments/ecosystems/water/vitalwater/. Accessed 11 April 2008
  73. UNFCCC (2008) Project development documents; in particular for the projects with reference Number 0121 (Bagepalli CDM Biogas Programme), 0136 and 0139 (Nepal biogas Activity I and II) and 0476 (Fossil fuel switch) and projects under the methodologies ACM0010 (former AM0006 and AM0016—manure management), AM0015 (bagasse based cogeneration), AMS.I.C. and AMS.I.D. (e.g. rice husk, palm oil production residues). http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/projsearch.html. Accessed 11 April 2008
  74. US Senate (2005) Energy Policy Act of 2005. Public Law 109-58-AUG. 8, 2005, 109th Congress of the US Senate and House of Representatives. In particular Title II, and IX, Subtitle C. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ058.109.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2008
  75. Whitehouse (2007) State of the Union Address. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070123-2.html. Accessed 11 April 2008
  76. Willer H, Yussefi-Menzler M, Sorensen N (eds) (2008) The world of organic agriculture—statistics and emerging trends 2008. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL). EarthscanGoogle Scholar
  77. WWI (2006) Biofuels for transportation: global potential and implications for sustainable agriculture and energy in the 21st century. Worldwatch Institute, prepared for the German Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV) in coordination with the German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ) and the German Agency of Renewable Resources (FNR)Google Scholar
  78. Yang H, Reichert P, Abbaspour KC, Zehnder AJB (2003) A water resources threshold and its implications for food security. Environ Sci Technol 37(14):3048–3054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zah R, Böni H, Gauch H, Hischier R, Lehmann M, Wäger P (2007) Ökobilanz von Energieprodukten: Ökologische Bewertung von Biotreibstoffen, EMPA, Study on behalf of the Federal Departments for Energy, Environment and Agriculture, Switzerland. Scharlemann and Laurence (2008) review this study in Science. http://www.news-service.admin.ch/NSBSubscriber/message/attachments/8514.pdf. 22 August 2008

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Socioeconomic InstituteUniversity of ZurichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations