Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 93, Issue 1–2, pp 39–54 | Cite as

The likelihood of holding outdoor skating marathons in the Netherlands as a policy-relevant indicator of climate change

  • H. Visser
  • A. C. Petersen
Open Access
Article

Abstract

“When I was born – in 1956 – the chance of realizing a Frisian Eleven City Ice Skating Marathon in Netherlands was 1 in 4. When my daughter was born – in 1999 – this chance had diminished to 1 in 10. An enormous change in one generation!” This quote was taken from a speech by J. P. Balkenende, prime minister of the Netherlands. It illustrates how a seemingly odd indicator of climate change, the chance of organizing large-scale outdoor ice-skating marathons, can play a role in the public and political debate on climate change. Outdoor skating has a very strong public appeal in the Netherlands, and the diminishing chances of holding such events provide an additional Dutch motive for introducing climate-policy measures. Here, “ice skating marathons” are approached from three angles: (1) the societal/political angle as described above, (2) the more technical angle, of how to derive annual chances for holding large-scale marathons such as the Eleven City Marathon (‘Elfstedentocht’), and (3) the role of (communicating) uncertainties. Since the statistical approach was developed in response to communicational needs, both statistical and communicative aspects are reported on in this article.

Keywords

Generalize Extreme Value Structural Time Series Structural Time Series Model Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency Average Return Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen K, Francey R, Michael K, Nunez M (1999) A structural time series approach to the reconstruction of Tasmanian maximum temperatures. Environ Model Softw 14:261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandsma T (2001) How many 11 city ice-skate marathons in the 21st century? Zenit 28:194–197 (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  3. Brandsma T, Können GP, Wessels HRA (2002) Empirical estimation of the effect of urban heat advection on temperature series of De Bilt. Int J Climatol 23:829–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Bruin HAR, Wessels HRA (1988) A model for the formation and melting of ice on surface waters. J Appl Meteorol 27:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Bruin HAR, Wessels HRA (1990) Ice in the low lands. Zenit 17:437–444 (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  6. Durbin J, Koopman SJ (2001) Time series analysis by state space methods. Oxford Statistical Science Series, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Gigerenzer G, Hertwig R, Broek E, van den Fasolo B, Katsikopoulos KV (2005) “A 30% chance of rain tomorrow”: how does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Anal 25(3):623–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gössling S, Hall CM (2006) Uncertainties in predicting tourist flows under scenarios of climate change. Clim Change 79(3–4):181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harvey AC (1984) A unified view of statistical forecasting procedures. J Forecast 3:245–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harvey AC (1989) Forecasting, structural time series models and the Kalman filter. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Janssen PHM, Petersen AC, van der Sluijs JP, Risbey JS, Ravetz JR (2005) A guidance for assessing and communicating uncertainties. Water Sci Technol 52:125–131Google Scholar
  12. Kitagawa G (1981) A nonstationary time series model and its fitting by a recursive filter. Journal Time Series Analysis 2:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lenten LJA, Moosa IA (2003) An empirical investigation into long-term climate change in Australia. Environ Model Softw 18:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MNP (2005) Environmental balance 2005, the Dutch environment explained. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, RIVM/MNP report (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  15. MNP/UU (2003) RIVM/MNP guidance for uncertainty assessment and communication. MNP/UU report. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, and Utrecht University, Utrecht. Download from http://www.mnp.nl/guidance or http://www.nusap.net/guidance
  16. Petersen AC (2006) Simulating nature: a philosophical study of computer-simulation uncertainties and their role in climate science and policy advice. Het Spinhuis Publishers, Apeldoorn and Antwerp. Download from http://hdl.handle.net/1871/11385 Google Scholar
  17. Refsgaard JC, van der Sluijs JP, Højberg AL, Vanrolleghem PA (2007) Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process: a review. Environ Model Softw 22:1543–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stern DI, Kaufmann RK (2000) Detecting a global warming signal in hemispheric temperature series: a structural time series analysis. Clim Change 47:411–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sterne JAC, Smith GD (2001) Sifting the evidence–what’s wrong with significance tests? BMJ 322:226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. van Asselt MBA (2000) Perspectives on uncertainty and risk: the PRIMA approach to decision support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. van den Brakel J, Visser H (1996) The influence of environmental conditions on tree-ring series of Norway spruce for different canopy and vitality classes. For Sci 42(2):206–219Google Scholar
  22. van der Sluijs JP (2002) A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment. Futures 34:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van der Sluijs JP (2007) Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: insights from the UPEM conference. Environ Model Softw 22:590–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van der Sluijs JP, Petersen AC, Janssen PHM, Risbey JS, Ravetz JR (2008) Exploring the quality of evidence for complex and contested policy decisions. Env Res Lett 3:024008(9 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. van Oldenborgh GJ, van Ulden A (2003) On the relationship between global warming, local warming in the Netherlands and changes in circulation in the 20th century. Int J Climatol 23:1711–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Visser H (2004a) Estimation and detection of flexible trends. Atmos Environ 38:4135–4145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Visser H (2004b) Description of the TrendSpotter software. RIVM Memo 007/2004 IMPGoogle Scholar
  28. Visser H (2005) The significance of climate change in the Netherlands. An analysis of historical and future trends (1901–2020). RIVM/MNP report 550002007. Download from http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/550002007.pdf
  29. Visser H, Molenaar J (1995) Trend estimation and regression analysis in climatological time series: an application of structural time series models and the Kalman filter. J Climate 8(5):969–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wardekker JA, van der Sluijs JP, Janssen PHM, Kloprogge P, Petersen AC (2008) Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface. Env Sci Pol 11(7):627–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Young PC, Lane K, Ng CN, Palmer D (1991) Recursive forecasting, smoothing and seasonal adjustment of non-stationary environmental data. J Forecast 10:57–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Netherlands Environmental Assessment AgencyBilthovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations