Fire and sustainability: considerations for California’s altered future climate

Abstract

In addition to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, actions to achieve a sustainable coexistence with wildfire need to be taken now. In this paper we suggest several important policy, planning, and management changes that should be made, regardless of the many uncertainties in predicting future fire regimes. Similar to how other natural hazards are addressed, a risk-based framework for fire-related decisions is crucial. Reintroduction of fire to fire-prone ecosystems, careful use of fire surrogates, and creation of new and flexible policies will be needed for successful ecosystem management. Growing incompatibilities between urban development and wildfire also require a serious reevaluation of urban planning and building in fire-prone locations to reach a sustainable coexistence with fire. Our future cities and communities must be less susceptible to wildfire damage, and the ecosystems upon which we depend must be made more resilient to further disruptions in fire regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agee JK, Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For Ecol Manag 211:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Booth DB, Jackson R (1997) Urbanization of aquatic systems – degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 22:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cova TJ (2005) Public safety in the urban–wildland interface: should fire-prone communities have a maximum occupancy? Nat Hazards Rev 6:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis FW, Michaelsen J (1995) Sensitivity of fire regime in chaparral ecosystems to global climate change. In: Moreno JM, Oechel WC (eds) Global change and mediterranean-type ecosystems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Field CB, Daily GC, Davis FW, Gaines S, Matson PA, Melack J, Miller NL (1999) Confronting climate change in California: ecological impacts on the golden state. Cambridge, MA, Union of Concerned Scientists

    Google Scholar 

  6. Finney MA (2001) Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior. For Sci 47:219–228

    Google Scholar 

  7. Finney MA (2005) The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire. For Ecol Manag 211:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fried JS, Torn MS, Mills E (2004) The impact of climate change on wildfire severity: a regional forecast for northern California. Clim Change 64:169–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fry DL, Stephens SL (2006) Influence of humans and climate on the fire history of a Ponderosa pine-mixed conifer forest in the southeastern Klamath Mountains, California. For Ecol Manag 223:428–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gill MA (2005) Landscape fires as social disasters: an overview of “the bushfire problem”. Environ Hazards 6:65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gutsell SL, Johnson EA, Miyanishi K, Keeley JE, Disckenson M, Bridge SRJ (2001) Varied ecosystems need different fire protection. Nature 409:997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hickman JC (1993) The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  13. Husari S, Nichols T, Sugihara NG, Stephens SL (2006) Fuel management. In: Sugihara NG, van Wagtendonk JW, Fites-Kaufman J, Shaffer KE, Thode AE (eds) Fire in California ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley CA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keeley JE (2005) Impact of antecedent climate on fire regimes in coastal California. International Joural of Wildland Fire 13:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ, Moritz MA (2004) Lessons from the October 2003 wildfires in southern California. J For 102:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lenihan JM, Drapek R, Bachelet D, Neilson RP (2003) Climate change effects on vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire in California. Ecol Appl 13:1667–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Malanson GP, Westman WE (1991) Modeling interactive effects of climate change, air pollution, and fire on a California shrubland. Climatic Change 18:363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller C, Urban DL (1999) Forest pattern, fire, and climatic change in the Sierra Nevada. Ecosystems 2:76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller C, Landres PB, Alaback PB (2000) Evaluating risks and benefits of wildland fire at landscape scales. In: Neuenschwander LF, Ryan KC, Gollberg GE, Greer JD (eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop: “Crossing the Millennium: Integrating Spatial Technologies and Ecological Principles for a New Age in Fire Management,” Boise, Idaho, June 15–17, 1999, University of Idaho, pp 78–87

  20. Moritz MA (2003) Spatiotemporal analysis of controls on shrubland fire regimes: age dependency and fire hazard. Ecology 48:351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moritz MA, Keeley JE, Johnson EA, Schaffner AA (2004) Testing a basic assumption of shrubland fire management: how important is fuel age? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Olsen JR (2006) Climate change and floodplain management in the United States. Clim Change 76:407–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Price C, Rind D (1994) The impact of a 2 X CO2 climate on lightning-caused fires. J Climate 7:1484–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, McKeefry JF (2005) The Wildland–urban interface in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reams MA, Haines TK, Renner CR, Wascom MW, Kingre H (2005) Goals, obstacles, and effective strategies of wildfire mitigation programs in the wildland–urban interface. Forest Policy and Economics 7:818–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Salinger MJ, Sivakumar MVK, Motha R (2005) Reducing vulnerability of agriculture and forestry to climate variability and change: workshop summary and recommendations. Clim Change 70:341–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Soulé ME (1991) Land-use planning and wildlife maintenance: guidelines for conserving wildlife in an urban landscape. J Am Plan Assoc 57:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stephens SL, Fulé PZ (2005) Western pine forests with continuing frequent fire regimes: possible reference sites for management. J For 103:532–542

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stephens SL, Ruth LW (2005) Federal forest fire policy in the United States. Ecological Applications 15:532–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stephens SL, Sugihara NG (2006) Fire management and policy since European settlement. In: Sugihara NG, van Wagtendonk JW, FitesKaufman J, Shaffer KE, Thode AE (eds) Fire in California Ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  31. Swetnam TW, Betancourt JI (1990) Fire-southern oscillation relations in the Southwestern United States. Science 249:1017–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Swetnam TW, Allen CD, Betancourt JL (1999) Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecol Appl 9:1189–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Theobald DM, Miller JR, Hobbs NT (1997) Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat. Landsc Urban Plan 39:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wotton BM, Flannigan MD (1993) Length of fire season in a changing climate. For Chron 69:187–192

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max A. Moritz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moritz, M.A., Stephens, S.L. Fire and sustainability: considerations for California’s altered future climate. Climatic Change 87, 265–271 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9361-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fire Regime
  • Fire Management
  • Wildland Fire
  • Fire Weather
  • Fire Policy