Adaptability and adaptations of California’s water supply system to dry climate warming

Abstract

Economically optimal operational changes and adaptations for California’s water supply system are examined for a dry form of climate warming (GFDL CM2.1 A2) with year 2050 water demands and land use. Economically adaptive water management for this climate scenario is compared to a similar scenario with the historical climate. The effects of population growth and land use alone are developed for comparison. Compared with the historic hydrology, optimized operations for the dry climate warming scenario raise water scarcity and total operation costs by $490 million/year with year 2050 demands. Actual costs might be somewhat higher where non-economic objectives prevail in water management. The paper examines the economical mix of adaptation, technologies, policies, and operational changes available to keep water supply impacts to such modest levels. Results from this screening model suggest promising alternatives and likely responses and impacts. Optimized operations of ground and surface water storage change significantly with climate. Dry-warm climate change increases the seasonal storage range of surface reservoirs and aquifers. Surface reservoir peak storage usually occurs about a month earlier under dry-warm climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Draper AJ (2001) Implicit stochastic optimization with limited foresight for reservoir systems. Dissertation, University of California, Davis, Davis

  2. Draper AJ, Jenkins MW, Kirby KW, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2003) Economic-engineering optimization for California water management. J Water Resour Plan Manage 129(3):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DWR (1998) California water plan update. Bulletin 160–98, Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA

    Google Scholar 

  4. DWR (2006) Progress in incorporating climate change into management of California’s water resources. California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbons DC (1986) The economic value of water. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gleick PH, Haasz D, Henges-Jeck C, Srinivasan V, Wolff GH, Cushing KK, Mann A (2003) Waste not, want not: the potential for urban water conservation in California. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security, Oakland, CA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harou JJ, Lund JR (2007). Economic and water management effects of a no overdraft policy: California’s Tulare basin. The global importance of groundwater in the 21st century: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Groundwater Sustainability, N. Hernandez-Mora, A. de la Hera, and S. Ragone, eds., NGWA

  8. Harou JJ, Medellin-Azuara J, Zhu T, Tanaka SK, Lund JR, Stine S, Jenkins MW, Olivares MA (2006) Extreme drought and water supply management in California. 2006 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hazen A (1914) Storage to be provided in impounding reservoirs for municipal water supply. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 77:1539–1640

    Google Scholar 

  10. HEC (1991) Columbia river system analysis model-phase I. US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Howitt RE, Ward KB, Msangi S (2001) Statewide agricultural production model. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jenkins MW (2004) California Urban Water Demands for 2050. University of California, Davis, Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jenkins MW, Draper AJ, Lund JR, Howitt RE, Tanaka SK, Ritzema R, Marques GF, Msangi SM, Newlin BD, Van Lienden BJ, Davis MD, Ward AKB (2001) Improving California water management: optimizing value and flexibility. University of California, Davis, Davis, California

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jenkins MW, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2003) Using economic loss functions to value urban water scarcity in California. J Am Water Works Assoc 95(2):58–70

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jenkins MW, Lund JR, Howitt RE, Draper AJ, Msangi SM, Tanaka SK, Ritzema RS, Marques GF (2004) Optimization of California’s water supply system: results and insights. J Water Resour Plan Manage 130(4):271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Landis JD, Reilly M (2002) How we will grow: baseline projections of California’s urban footprint through the year 2100. Project completion report. Department of City and Regional Planning, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lund JR, Ferreira I (1996) Operating rule optimization for Missouri River reservoir system. J Water Resour Plan Manage 122(4):287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lund JR, Howitt RE, Jenkins MW, Zhu T, Tanaka SK, Pulido M, Tauber M, Ritzema R, Ferreira IC (2003) Climate warming and California’s water future. Report No. 03-1. University of California, Davis, Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller NL, Bashford KE, Strem E (2001) Climate change sensitivity study of California hydrology. A report to the California Energy Commission. Technical Report No. 49110. LBNL, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Null SE, Lund JR (2006) Reassembling hetch hetchy: water supply without O’Shaughnessy dam. J Am Water Res Assoc 42(2):395–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pulido-Velazquez M, Jenkins MW, Lund JR (2004) Economic values for conjunctive use and water banking in southern California. Water Resour Res 40(3):W03401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka SK, Zhu T, Lund JR, Howitt RE, Jenkins MW, Pulido-Velazquez M, Tauber M, Ritzema RS, Ferreira IC (2006) Climate warming and water management adaptation for California. Clim Change 76(3–4):361–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. USBR (1997) Central Valley project improvement act: draft programmatic environmental impact statement. United States Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, CA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu TJ, Jenkins MW, Lund JR (2005) Estimated impacts of climate warming on California water availability under twelve future climate scenarios. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(5):1027–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josué Medellín-Azuara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Medellín-Azuara, J., Harou, J.J., Olivares, M.A. et al. Adaptability and adaptations of California’s water supply system to dry climate warming. Climatic Change 87, 75–90 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9355-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Water Scarcity
  • Water Market
  • Water Resour Plan Manage
  • Surface Water Storage
  • Urban Water Demand