Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects

Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents an analytical framework for analyzing Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects in terms of their contribution to employment generation, equal distribution of CDM returns, and improvement of local air quality. It assesses 16 officially registered CDM projects with regard to whether they fulfill the two objectives required by the Kyoto Protocol: greenhouse gas emission reductions and contribution to sustainable development in the host country. While a large part (72%) of the total portfolio’s expected Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) are likely to represent real and measurable emission reductions, less than 1% are likely to contribute significantly to sustainable development in the host country. According to our analysis, there are currently no UNFCCC registered CDM projects that are likely to fulfill the Kyoto Protocol’s twofold objective of simultaneously delivering greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction and contributing to sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bøhren Ø, Ødegaard BA (2001) Patterns of corporate ownership: insights from a unique data set. Nord J Polit Econ 27(1):55–86

    Google Scholar 

  • De Montis A et al. (2000) MCDA and sustainable development – a comparison of methods, Working paper. Universita di Cagliari, Cagliari

  • Dobbelaere S (2004) Ownership, firm size and rent sharing in Bulgaria. Labour Econ 11(2):165–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner S, Michaelowa A (2003) Defining investment additionality for CDM projects – practical approaches. Energy Policy 31(10):1007–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly C, Helme N (2000) Ensuring CDM project compatibility. Working paper. Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington (www.ccap.org)

  • Mygind N (2004) Shareholder, stakeholder-owner or broad stakeholder maximization, Copenhagen Business School. Working paper No. 53 presented at the IAFEP (International Association For the Economics of Participation) 12th Biannual Conference, Mending the Global Economy: A Role for Economic Participation. St. Mary’s University, Halifax, 8–10 July 2004

  • Scholz RW, Tietje O (2002) Embedded case study methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter C (2003) Sustainability check-up for CDM projects: How to assess the sustainability of international projects under the Kyoto Protocol. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter C et al. (2001) Small-scale CDM. Opportunities and limits, study on behalf of Swiss development cooperation. Factor Consulting and Management AG, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (1997) Kyoto protocol to the UN framework convention on climate change. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2002) Report of the conference of the parties on its seventh session, held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 200, Addendum. Part two: action taken by the conference of the parties. Volume II. FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2

  • UNFCCC (2005) CDM projects and methodologies database. http://unfccc.int/2860.php/

  • United Nations (2005) Millennium development goals. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Sutter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutter, C., Parreño, J.C. Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects. Climatic Change 84, 75–90 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9269-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9269-9

Keywords

Navigation