Abstract
Today, the United States is as dependent on fossil fuels for its patterns of consumption and production as its South was on slavery in the mid-nineteenth century. That US congressmen tend to rationalise fossil fuel use despite climate risks to future generations just as Southern congressmen rationalised slavery despite ideals of equality is perhaps unsurprising, then. This article explores similarities between the rationalisation of slavery in the abolition debates and the rationalisation of ongoing emissions of greenhouse gases in the US congressional debates on the Kyoto Protocol.
References
Adams J (1995) Risk. University College London, London
Azar C, Schneider SH (2002) Are the economic costs of stabilising the atmosphere prohibitive? Ecol Econ 42(1–2):73–80
Bush GW (2001) Letter from the President to Senators Hagel, Helms, Craig, and Roberts. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/03/20010314.html. Cited 13 March 2001
Calhoun JC (1849) The southern address. In: Crallé RK (ed) The works of John C. Calhoun: a disquisition on government and a discourse on the constitution and government of the United States. Charleston, SC, 1851, vol. VI, pp. 290–313
CG, Congressional Globe: record of the congressional debates of the 23rd through 42nd Congresses (1833–73). http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwcglink.html
CR, Congressional Record http://www.gpoaccess.gov/crecord/retrieve.html
Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
EIA (Energy Information Administration) (1998) Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol on U.S. Energy Markets and Economic Activity, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/kyoto/pdf/sroiaf9803.pdf
EIA (Energy Information Administration) (2004) International Energy Outlook 2004, DOE/EIA-0484(2004), Washington, DC
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2003) Memorandum August 28, 2003. http://www.epa.gov/airlinks/co2petitiongcmemo8-28.pdf
Hansen J (2005) A slippery slope: how much global warming constitutes “dangerous anthropogenic interference”? An editorial essay. Clim Change 68(3):269–279
Hirschman AO (1991) The rhetoric of reaction: perversity, futility, jeopardy. Harvard University Press, Harvard
Hummel JR (1996) Emancipating slaves, enslaving free men: a history of the American civil war. Open Court, Chicago
IPCC (1995) Climate change 1995. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jenkins WS (1935) Pro-slavery thought in the old south. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
Lincoln A (1860) The complete works of Abraham Lincoln. The Tandy – Thomas Co., New York, 1905, vol. V, pp. 343–44
Meyer A (2000) Contraction & convergence: the global solution to climate change. Schumacher briefing no. 5. Green Books, Bristol
Miller WL (1996) Arguing about slavery, The great battle in the United States Congress. Knopf, New York
Müller B (2000) Congressional climate change hearings: comedy or tragedy? A primer for aliens. http://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/~mueller/primer.pdf
Müller B (2001) Varieties of distributive justice in climate change. Clim Change 48(2–3):273–288
NAS (1998) Statement by the Council of the National Academy of Sciences regarding Global Change Petition. http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/s04201998?OpenDocument. Cited 20 April 1998
NAS (2001) Climate change science: an analysis of some key questions. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Orr D (2000) 2020: a proposal. Conserv Biol 14(2):338–341
PEW Center on Global Climate Change (2004) Climate change activities in the U.S.: 2004 Update, Arlington. www.pewclimate.org
RDC, Gales & Seaton’s Register of Debates in Congress: record of the congressional debates of the 18th Congress, 2nd Session through the 25th Congress, 1st Session (1824–37). http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwrdlink.html
Robinson AR, Baliunas SL, Soon W, Robinson, ZW (1998) Environmental effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, http://www.oism.org/pproject/index.htm
Simms WG (1852) The pro-slavery argument; as maintained by the most distinguished writers of the Southern States, containing the several essays on the subject of Chancellor Harper, Governor Hammond, Dr. Simms, and Professor Dew, Charleston, Walker, Richards & Co. http://www.hti.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=moa;idno=ABT7488.0001.001
Tarbox IN (1843) An address on the origin, progress & present condition of philosophy 4, Utica
Tise LE (1987) Proslavery: a history of the defense of slavery in America. University of Georgia Press, Athens, p1701–1840
US Census (1860) Population of the United States in 1860, pp. 598–599
U.S. Census Bureau (2004) International Population Reports WP/02, Global Population Profile: 2002. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
WEFA (Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates) (1998) Global warming: the high cost of the Kyoto Protocol. Eddystone, PA. See executive summary at http://www.api.org/globalclimate/wefa/exec.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Davidson, M.D. Parallels in reactionary argumentation in the US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol. Climatic Change 86, 67–82 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9250-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9250-7
Keywords
- Climate Policy
- Kyoto Protocol
- Energy Information Administration
- House Floor
- Congressional Record