Skip to main content

Parallels in reactionary argumentation in the US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol


Today, the United States is as dependent on fossil fuels for its patterns of consumption and production as its South was on slavery in the mid-nineteenth century. That US congressmen tend to rationalise fossil fuel use despite climate risks to future generations just as Southern congressmen rationalised slavery despite ideals of equality is perhaps unsurprising, then. This article explores similarities between the rationalisation of slavery in the abolition debates and the rationalisation of ongoing emissions of greenhouse gases in the US congressional debates on the Kyoto Protocol.


  • Adams J (1995) Risk. University College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar C, Schneider SH (2002) Are the economic costs of stabilising the atmosphere prohibitive? Ecol Econ 42(1–2):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush GW (2001) Letter from the President to Senators Hagel, Helms, Craig, and Roberts. Cited 13 March 2001

  • Calhoun JC (1849) The southern address. In: Crallé RK (ed) The works of John C. Calhoun: a disquisition on government and a discourse on the constitution and government of the United States. Charleston, SC, 1851, vol. VI, pp. 290–313

  • CG, Congressional Globe: record of the congressional debates of the 23rd through 42nd Congresses (1833–73).

  • CR, Congressional Record

  • Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (Energy Information Administration) (1998) Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol on U.S. Energy Markets and Economic Activity, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.

  • EIA (Energy Information Administration) (2004) International Energy Outlook 2004, DOE/EIA-0484(2004), Washington, DC

  • EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2003) Memorandum August 28, 2003.

  • Hansen J (2005) A slippery slope: how much global warming constitutes “dangerous anthropogenic interference”? An editorial essay. Clim Change 68(3):269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman AO (1991) The rhetoric of reaction: perversity, futility, jeopardy. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel JR (1996) Emancipating slaves, enslaving free men: a history of the American civil war. Open Court, Chicago

  • IPCC (1995) Climate change 1995. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins WS (1935) Pro-slavery thought in the old south. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln A (1860) The complete works of Abraham Lincoln. The Tandy – Thomas Co., New York, 1905, vol. V, pp. 343–44

  • Meyer A (2000) Contraction & convergence: the global solution to climate change. Schumacher briefing no. 5. Green Books, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller WL (1996) Arguing about slavery, The great battle in the United States Congress. Knopf, New York

  • Müller B (2000) Congressional climate change hearings: comedy or tragedy? A primer for aliens.

  • Müller B (2001) Varieties of distributive justice in climate change. Clim Change 48(2–3):273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAS (1998) Statement by the Council of the National Academy of Sciences regarding Global Change Petition. Cited 20 April 1998

  • NAS (2001) Climate change science: an analysis of some key questions. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr D (2000) 2020: a proposal. Conserv Biol 14(2):338–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PEW Center on Global Climate Change (2004) Climate change activities in the U.S.: 2004 Update, Arlington.

  • RDC, Gales & Seaton’s Register of Debates in Congress: record of the congressional debates of the 18th Congress, 2nd Session through the 25th Congress, 1st Session (1824–37).

  • Robinson AR, Baliunas SL, Soon W, Robinson, ZW (1998) Environmental effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine,

  • Simms WG (1852) The pro-slavery argument; as maintained by the most distinguished writers of the Southern States, containing the several essays on the subject of Chancellor Harper, Governor Hammond, Dr. Simms, and Professor Dew, Charleston, Walker, Richards & Co.;idno=ABT7488.0001.001

  • Tarbox IN (1843) An address on the origin, progress & present condition of philosophy 4, Utica

  • Tise LE (1987) Proslavery: a history of the defense of slavery in America. University of Georgia Press, Athens, p1701–1840

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census (1860) Population of the United States in 1860, pp. 598–599

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2004) International Population Reports WP/02, Global Population Profile: 2002. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • WEFA (Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates) (1998) Global warming: the high cost of the Kyoto Protocol. Eddystone, PA. See executive summary at

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc D. Davidson.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davidson, M.D. Parallels in reactionary argumentation in the US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol. Climatic Change 86, 67–82 (2008).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Climate Policy
  • Kyoto Protocol
  • Energy Information Administration
  • House Floor
  • Congressional Record