Skip to main content

A normative ethical framework in climate change

Abstract

The article spells out four domains of international distributive justice and the consequent criteria of equity, the purpose being to identify a pluralistic normative ethical framework for climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. Justice and equity should play a major role in favouring collective action against climate change, because the more the various dimensions of such action are just, the more any international climate initiative is feasible in principle. As far as mitigation is concerned, the definition of a just initial allocation of endowments focuses on the criterion of differentiated equality, taking account of undeserved inequalities as suggested by Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness. With regard to the subsequent exchange of endowments, the Pareto principle, supplemented by the envy-freeness one, is a viable option. Possibly a sound reference for the just financing of adaptation activities is the criterion of differentiated historical responsibility, backed by Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness. As regards the allocation of adaptation resources, the criterion of lack of human security, as substantiated in Sen’s capability approach, seems promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27:249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adger WN, Kelly PM (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 4:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adger WN, Paavola J, Huq S, Mace MJ (2006) Toward justice in adaptation to climate change. In: Adger WN, Huq S, Mace MJ, Paavola J (eds) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  4. Albin C (2001) Getting to fairness: negotiations over global public goods. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’

  5. Aldy JE, Orszag PR, Stiglitz JE (2001) Climate change: an agenda for global collective action. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington

  6. Ali A (2001) A conceptual framework for environmental justice based on shared but differentiated responsibilities. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 01–02, CSERGE, Norwich

  7. Alkire S (2002) A conceptual framework for human security. CRISE Working Paper #2

  8. Arnsperger C (1994) Envy-freeness and distributive justice. J Econ Surv 8:155–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ashton J, Wang X (2003) Equity and climate: in principle and practice. Beyond Kyoto Series, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington

  10. Aslam AM (2002) Equal per capita entitlements: a key to global participation on climate change? In: Baumert KA, Blanchard O, Llosa S, Perkaus J (eds) Building on the Kyoto protocol: options for protecting the climate, World Resources Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  11. Athanasiou T, Baer P (2002) Dead heat. Global justice and global warming. Seven Stories, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baer P (2002) Equity, greenhouse gas emissions, and global common resources. In: Schneider SH (ed) Climate change policy: a survey, Island, Washington, District of Columbia, p 393

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baer P (2006) Adaptation: who pays whom? In: Adger WN, Huq S, Mace MJ, Paavola J (eds) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baer P, Harte J, Herzog A, Hultman N, Raymond L (2000) Equal per capita emission rights: the key to a viable climate change policy. RAEL, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beitz CR (2000) Rawls’s law of peoples. Ethics 110:669–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Benestad O (1994) Energy needs and CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 22:725–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bodansky D (2002) U.S. climate policy after Kyoto: elements for success. Policy Brief 15, Carnegie Endowments for International Peace, Washington

  18. Bohm P (2000) International greenhouse gas emission trading – with special reference to the Kyoto protocol. In: Carraro C (ed) Equity and efficiency in climate change policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Working Paper 38

  20. Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly PM (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Glob Environ Change 15:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Caney S (2001) International distributive justice. Polit Stud 49:974–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carraro C, Buchner B (2002) Equity, development and climate change policy. In: Carraro C, Galeotti M, Kemfert C, Buchner B (eds) Climate Change Policy Regimes, International Trade and Economic Growth. Bruxelles, CEPS–ESRI Collaboration Studies

  23. Cohen GA (1993) Equality of what? On welfare, goods and capabilities. In: Nussbaum MC, Sen AK (eds) The quality of life. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  24. Criqui P, Mima S, Viguier P (1999) Marginal abatement cost of CO2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model. Energy Policy 27:585–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cullen B (1992) Philosophical theories of justice. In: Scherer KR (ed) Justice: interdisciplinary perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p 15

    Google Scholar 

  26. DeCanio SJ, Niemann P (2006) Equity effects of alternative assignments of global environmental rights. Ecol Econ 56:546–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eyckmans J, Schokkaert E (2003) An “ideal” normative theory for greenhouse negotiations. Working paper, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven

  28. Gardiner SM (2004) Ethics and global climate change. Ethics 114:555–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gauthier D (1986) Morals by agreement. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Grubb M (1995) Seeking fair weather: ethics and the international debate on climate change. Int Aff 71(3):463–496

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gupta J (2000) On behalf of my delegation. A survival guide for Developing Country Climate Negotiators. Center for Sustainable Development in the America, Washington, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg

  32. Hay AM (1995) Concepts of equity, fairness and justice in geographical studies. Trans Inst Br Geogr NS 20:500–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Helm C (2003) Fair division of common property resources when monetary compensations are possible. Working paper, School of Business and Economics, Humboldt University, Berlin

  34. Helm C, Simonis UE (2000) Distributive justice in international environmental policy – theoretical foundation and exemplary formulation. Working paper, Science Center, Berlin

  35. Huq S, Reid H (2004) Mainstreaming adaptation in development. IDS Bull 35:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC (2001a) Climate change 2001: synthesis report – summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva

  37. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC (2001b) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability – summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva

  38. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC (2001c) Climate change 2001: mitigation – summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva

  39. Kelly P, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Change 47:325–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. King G, Murray CJL (2001–2002) Rethinking human security. Polit Sci Q 116:585–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Konow J (2003) Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. J Econ Lit XLI:1188–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Miller D (1988) The ethical significance of nationality. Ethics 98:647–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Miller D (1995) On nationality. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  44. Muller B (1999) Justice in global warming negotiations. How to obtain a procedurally fair compromise. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, London

    Google Scholar 

  45. Muller B (2001a) Fair compromise in a morally complex world. In: Proceedings Equity and Global Climate Change Conference, The Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington

  46. Muller B (2001b) Varieties of distributive justice in climate change. Clim Change 48:273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Muller B (2002) Equity in climate change: the great divide. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, London

    Google Scholar 

  48. Neumayer E (2000) In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecol Econ 33:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Nordhaus WD (1999) Global public goods and the problem of global warming. Annual Lecture, The Institute d’Economie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse

  50. Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state and utopia. Basic Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  51. O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Schjolden A, Nygaard, L (2004) What’s in a world? Conflicting interpretations of vulnerability in climate change research. CICERO Working Paper 2004:04, CICERO, Oslo

  52. Ott HE, Sachs W (2000) Ethical aspects of emission trading. Wuppertal Paper Nr. 110, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Wuppertal

  53. Paavola J (2005) Seeking justice: international environmental governance and climate change. Globalizations 2:309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Paavola J, Adger WN (2002) Justice and adaptation to climate change. Research Working Paper 23, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change, Norwich

  55. Paavola J, Adger WN (2006) Fair adaptation to climate change. Ecol Econ 56:594–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Page E (1999) Intergenerational justice and climate change. Polit Stud 47:53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pan J (2003) Emission rights and their transferability: equity concerns over climate change mitigation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 3:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Panayotou T, Sachs JD, Zwane AP (2002) Compensation for ‘meaningful participation’ in climate change control: a modest proposal and empirical analysis. J Environ Econ Manage 43:437–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Parikh J (2000) Viewpoint: inequity, a root cause of climate change. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  60. Paris R (2001) Human security. Paradigm shift or hot air? Int Secur 26:87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Pogge T (2004) The incoherence between Rawls’s theories of justice. Fordham Law Rev 72:1739–1759

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rawls J (1999) The law of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  64. Rayner S, Malone E (1998) Why study human choice and climate change? In: Rayner S, Malone E (eds) Human choice and climate change. Volume 1. The societal framework. Battelle, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  65. Richards M (2003) Poverty reduction, equity and climate change: global governance synergies or contradictions? Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ringius L, Frederiksen P (2002) Burden sharing in the context of global climate change. NERI Technical Report, no. 424, National Environmental Research Institute, Copenhagen

  67. Rose A, Steven SB, Edmonds J, Wise M (1998) International equity and differentiation in global warming policies: an application to tradable emission permits. Environ Resour Econ 12:25–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Schokkaert E (1992) The economics of distributive justice, welfare and freedoms. In: Scherer KR (ed) Justice: interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sen AK (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sen AK (1979) The welfare basis of real income comparison: a survey. J Econ Lit 17:1–45

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sen AK (1987) On ethics and economics. Basic Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sen AK (1990) Justice: means versus freedoms. Philos Public Aff 19:111–121

    Google Scholar 

  73. Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. Anchor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  74. Shogren J, Toman M (2000) Climate change policy. RFF Discussion Paper 00–22, Resources for the Future, Washington

  75. Shue H (1992) The unavoidability of justice. In: Hurrell A, Kingsbury B (eds) The international politics of the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 373

    Google Scholar 

  76. Shue H (1993) Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law Policy 15:39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Shue H (1999) Global environment and international inequality. Int Aff 75:531–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Shue H (2001) Climate. In: Jamieson D (ed) A companion to environmental ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  79. Shukla PR (1999) Justice, equity and efficiency in climate change: a developing country perspective. In: Toth F (ed) Fair weather? Equity concerns in climate change. Earthscan, London (also: Working paper e2 Analytics)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Tamir Y (1993) Liberal nationalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tata Energy Research Institute (TERI) (1999) Climate of concern – bridging the divide. Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  82. United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, Sweden, June 5–16, 1972, Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, UN Doc. A/CONF.48/14 [Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment]

  83. Varian HR (1974) Equity, envy and efficiency. J Econ Theory 9:63–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Varian HR (1976) Two problems in the theory of fairness. J Pub Econ 5:249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Weitzman ML (1974) Price vs. quantities. Rev Econ Stud 41:477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Grasso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grasso, M. A normative ethical framework in climate change. Climatic Change 81, 223–246 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9158-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Distributive Justice
  • Social Vulnerability
  • Marginal Abatement Cost
  • Human Security
  • Initial Allocation