Climatic Change

, Volume 81, Issue 3–4, pp 431–454 | Cite as

Changed thinning regimes may increase carbon stock under climate change: A case study from a Finnish boreal forest

  • Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo
  • Heli Peltola
  • Elemer Briceño-elizondo
  • Seppo Kellomäki
Original Article

Abstract

A physiological growth and yield model was applied for assessing the effects of forest management and climate change on the carbon (C) stocks in a forest management unit located in Finland. The aim was to outline an appropriate management strategy with regard to C stock in the ecosystem (C in trees and C in soil) and C in harvested timber. Simulations covered 100 years using three climate scenarios (current climate, ECHAM4 and HadCM2), five thinning regimes (based on current forest management recommendations for Finland) and one unthinned. Simulations were undertaken with ground true stand inventory data (1451 hectares) representing Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), Norway spruce (Picea abies) and silver birch (Betula pendula) stands. Regardless of the climate scenario, it was found that shifting from current practices to thinning regimes that allowed higher stocking of trees resulted in an increase of up to 11% in C in the forest ecosystem. It also increased the C in the timber yield by up to 14%. Compared to current climatic conditions, the mean increase over the thinning regimes in the total C stock in the forest ecosystem due to the climate change was a maximum of 1%; but the mean increase in total C in timber yield over thinning regimes was a maximum of 12%.

Keywords

Adaptation Forest management Carbon stock Forest ecosystem Carbon in timber yield Boreal forests Climate change Modelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Battaglia M, Sands PJ (1998) Process-based forest productivity models and their application in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 102:13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengtsson J, Wikström F (1993) Effects of whole-tree harvesting on the amount of soil carbon: model results. NZJ. Forest Science 23:380–389Google Scholar
  3. Cajander AK (1949) Metsätyypit ja niiden merkitys. Acta Forestalia Fennica 56:5–69 (in Finnish)Google Scholar
  4. Cannell MGR, Dewar RC (1995) The carbon sink provided by plantation forests and their products in Britain. Forestry 68:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter T, Bärlund I, Fronzek S, Kankaanpää S, Kaivo-oja J, Luukkanen J, Wilenius M, Tuomenvirta H, Jylhä K, Kahma K, Johansson M, Boman H, Launiainen J, Laurila T, Lindfors V, Tuovinen J-P, Aurela M, Syri S, Forsius M, Karvosenoja N (2002) The FINSKEN global change scenarios. In: Käyhkö J, Talve L (eds) Understanding the global system, The Finnish perspective. Painosalama, Turku, Finland p 32Google Scholar
  6. Chertov OG, Komarov AS (1997) SOMM – a model of soil organic matter dynamics. Ecological Modelling 94:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewar RC, Cannell MGR (1992) Carbon sequestration in the trees, soils and wood products of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples. Tree Physiology 11:49–71Google Scholar
  8. Díaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2003) Forest managment optimisation models when carbon captured is considered: a goal programming approach. Forest Ecology and Management 174:447–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erhard M, Lindner M, Cramer W (2001) Climate data. In: Kramer K, Mohren GMJ (eds) Long-term effects of climate change on carbon budgets of forests in Europe. ALTERRA Report 194, ALTERRA, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 151–161Google Scholar
  10. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:67–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finér L, Mannerkoski H, Piirainene S, Starr M (2003) Carbon and nitrogen pools in an old-growth, Norway spruce mixed forest in eastern Finland and changes associated with clear-cuttings. Forest Ecology and Management 174:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry (2001) Metsätilastollinen vuosikirjaGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia-Gonzalo J, Peltola H, Briceño-Elizondo E, Kellomäki S (2006) Effects of climate change and management on growth and timber yield in boreal forests, with economic implications. (submitted to Ecological Modelling journal)Google Scholar
  14. Goncalves JLM, Carlyle JC (1994) Modelling the influence of moisture and temperature on net nitrogen mineralization in a forested sandy soil Soil Biol Biochem 26:1557–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grace J (2001) Carbon cycle. Edinburgh University Press, pp 609–629Google Scholar
  16. Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ (eds) (1990) Climate change (1990). The IPCC scientific assessment. Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, p 365Google Scholar
  17. Hynynen J (1993) Self-thinning models for even-aged stands of Pinus sylvestris, picea abies and betula pendula. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8(3):326–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hynynen J, Ojansuu R, Hökkä H, Salminen H, Siipilehto J, Haapala P (2002) Models for predicting stand development in MELA System. Finnish Forest Research Institute. Research Papers 835:p 116Google Scholar
  19. IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (eds) Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 881Google Scholar
  20. Karjalainen T (1996a) Dynamics and potentials of carbon sequestration in managed stands and wood products in Finland under changing climatic conditions. Forest Ecology and Management 80(1–3):113– 132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karjalainen T (1996b), Model computations on sequestration of carbon in managed forests and wood products under changing climatic conditions in Finland. Journal of Environmental Management 47:311– 328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Kellomäki S, Mäakipää R (1999) Scenarios for the carbon balance of Finnish forests and wood products. Environmental Science and Policy 2:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Liski J, Nabuurs G-J, Eggers T, Lapveteläinen T, Kaipainen T (2003) Scenario analysis of the impacts of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget. Forest Policy and Economics 5:141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kauppi PE, Tomppo E, Ferm A (1995) C and N storage in living trees within Finland since the 1950s. Plant Soil 168–169:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kauppi P, Sedjo RJ, Apps M, Cerri C, Fujimori Y, Janzen H, Krankina O, Makundi W, Marland G, Masera O, Nabuurs GJ, Razali W, Ravindranath NH (2001) Options for enhancing and maintenance of Carbon sequestration Technical and economic potential of options to enhance, maintain and manage biological carbon reservoirs and Geo-Engineering. In: Metz et al.,(eds) Mitigation, IPCC Third assessment report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 302–343Google Scholar
  26. Kellomäki S, Kolström, M (1993) Computations on the yield of timber by Scots pine when subjected to varying levels of thinning under a changing climate in southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management 59:237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kellomäki S, Väisänen H (1996) Model computations on the effect of rising temperature on soil moisture and water availability in forest ecosystems dominated by Scots pine in the boreal zone in Finland. Climate Change 32:423–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kellomäki S, Väisänen H (1997) Modelling the dynamics of the forest ecosystem for climate change studies in the boreal conditions. Ecological Modelling 97:121–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kellomäki S., Karjalainen T., Väisänen H (1997a) More timber from boreal forests under changing climate? Forest Ecology and Management 94:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kellomäki S, Väisänen H, Kolström T (1997b) Model computations on the effects of elevating temperature and atmospheric CO2 on the regeneration of Scots pine at the timber line in Finland. Climatic Change, 37:683–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kellomäki S, Lindner M, Erhar M, Skocibusic N, Junge S, (2005) Chapter 2. Forests and climate in Europe, and climate scenarios used in the project. In: Kellomäki S, Leinonen S (eds) Management of European forests under changing climatic conditions. Research Notes 163. University of Joensuu, Forest Faculty, pp 33–44Google Scholar
  32. Kirschbaum MUF (1994) The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27:753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kramer K, Leinonen I, Bartelink HH, Berbigier P, Borghetti M, Bernhofer C, Cienciala E, Dolman AJ, Froer O, Gracia CA, Granier A, Grünwald T, Hari P, Jans W, Kellomäki S, Loustau D, Magnani F, Matteucci G, Mohren GMJ, Moors E, Nissinen A, Peltola H, Sabaté S, Sanchez A, Sontag M, Valentini R, Vesala T (2002) Evaluation of 6 process-based forest growth models based on eddy-covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes at 6 forest sites in Europe. Global Change Biology 8:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Landsberg JJ, Waring RH (1997) A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiationuse efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. Forest Ecology and Management 95:205–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lasch P, Lindner M, Ebert B, Flechsig M, Gerstengarbe F-W, Suckow F, Wernerl PC (1999) Regional impact analysis of climate change on natural and managed forests in the Federal state of Brandenburg, Germany. Environ. Modelling Assessment 4:273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lexer MJ, Honninger K, Scheifinger H, Matulla C, Groll N, Kromp-Kolb H, Schadauer K, Starlinger F, Englisch M (2002) The sensitivity of Austrian forest to scenarios of climatic change: a large scale risk assessment based on a modified gap model and forest inventory data. Forest Ecology and Management 162:53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Linder S (1987) Responses of water and nutrition in coniferous ecosystems. In: Schulze ED, Zwölfer H (eds.) potentials and limitations of ecosystem analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 180–222Google Scholar
  38. Lindner M (2000) Developing adaptive forest management strategies to cope with climate change. Tree Physiology 20:299–307Google Scholar
  39. Liski J, Pussinen A, Pingoud K, Mäakipää R, Karjalainen T (2001) Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31:2004–2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lloyd J, Taylor JA (1994) On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecology 8:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marland G, Schlamadinger B (1999) The Kyoto protocol could make a difference for the optimal forest-based CO2 mitigation strategy: some results from GORCAM. Environmental Science and Policy 2:111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marklund LG (1988) Biomassafunktioner for tall, gran och bjork I Sverige. Summary: biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Survey, Report 45. 73, (in Swedish, with summary in English)Google Scholar
  43. Masera OR, Garza-Caligaris JF, Kanninen M, Karjalainen K, Liski J, Nabuurs GJ, Pussinen A, De Jong BHJ, Mohren GMJ (2003) Modeling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: the CO2FIX V.2 approach, Ecological Modelling 164(2–3): 177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Matala J, Hynynen J, Miina J, Ojansuu R, Peltola H, Sievänen R, Väisänen H, Kellomäki S (2003) Comparison of a physiological model and a statistical model for prediction of growth and yield in boreal forests. Ecological Modelling 161:95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matala J, Ojansuu R, Peltola H, Sievänen R, Kellomäki S (2005) Introducing effects of temperature and CO2 elevation on tree growth into a statistical growth and yield model. Ecological Modelling (in review)Google Scholar
  46. Medlyn BE, Barton CVM, Broadmedow MSJ, Ceulemans R, Dangeles P, Forstreuter M, Freeman M, Jackson SB, Kellomäki S, Laitat E, Rey A, Roberntz P, Sigurdsson BD, Strassemeyer J, Wang K, Curtis PS, Jarvis PG (2001) Stomatal conductance of forest species after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentrations: a synthesis. New Phytologist 149:247–264Google Scholar
  47. Medlyn BE, Dreyer E, Ellsworth D, Forstreuter M, Harley PC, Kirschbaum MUF, Le Roux X, Montpied P, Stassenmeyer J, Walcroft A, Wang K, Loustau D (2002). Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II A review of experimental data. Plant, Cell & Environment 25:1167–1179Google Scholar
  48. Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore III B, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 363:234–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mäkelä A (1997) A carbon balance model of growth and self-pruning in trees based on structural relationships. Forest Science 43:7–24Google Scholar
  50. Mäkelä A, Landsberg J, Ek AR, Burk TE, Ter-Mikaelian M, Ågren GI, Oliver CD, Puttonen P (2000a) Process-based models for forest ecosystem management: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementations. Tree Physiology 20:289–298Google Scholar
  51. Mäkelä A, Sievänen R, Lindner M, Lasch P (2000b) Application of volume growth and survival graphs in the evaluation of four process-based forest growth models. Tree Physiology 20:347–355Google Scholar
  52. Mäkipää R, Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Kukkola M (1998a) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on carbon accumulation in boreal forests: model computations compared with the results of long-term fertilization experiments. Chemosphere 36 (4–5):1155–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mäkipää R, Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Kukkola M, Kellomäki S, Mälkönen E (1998b) Applicability of a forest simulation model for estimating effects of nitrogen deposition on a forest ecosystem: test of the validity of a gap-type model. Forest Ecology and Management 108(3):239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mäkipää R, Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Kellomäki S (1999) Effects of climate change and nitrogen deposition on the carbon sequestration of a forest ecosystem in the boreal zone. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29:1490–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nabuurs GJ, Schelhaas MJ (2002) Carbon profiles of typical forest types across Europe assessed with CO2FIX. Ecological Indicators 1:213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nabuurs G-J, Mohren GMJ (1995) Modelling analysis of potential carbon sequestration in selected forest types. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25:1157–1172Google Scholar
  57. Parry M (ed) (2000) Assessment of potential effects and adaptations for climate change in Europe. The European acacia project. Report of a concerted action of the Environment Programme of the Research Directorate General of the Commission of the European Community. Jackson Environment Institute, School of Environmental Sciences. University of East Anglia, United Kingdom p 320Google Scholar
  58. Peterjohn WT, Melillo JM, Steudler PA, Newkirk KM, Bowles FP, Aber JD (1994) Responses of trace gas fluxes and N availability to experimentally elevated soil temperatures. Ecol Appl 4:617–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pussinen A, Karjalainen T, Mäkipää R, Valsta L, Kellomäki S (2002) Forest carbon sequestration and harvests in Scots pine stand under different climate and nitrogen deposition scenarios. Forest Ecology and Management 158(1–3):103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B 44:81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reineke LH (1933) Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. Journal of Agricultural Research 46(7):627–638Google Scholar
  62. Sabaté S, Gracia CA, Sánchez A (2002) Likely effects of climate change on growth of Quercus ilex, Pinus halepensis, Pinus pinaster, Pinus sylvestris and Fagus sylvatica forests in the Mediterranean region. Forest Ecology and Management 162(1):23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sands PJ, Battaglia M, Mummery D (2000) Application of process-based models to forest management: experience with ProMod, a simple plantation productivity model. Tree Physiology 20:383–392Google Scholar
  64. Schlamadinger B, Marland G (1996) Carbon implications of forest management strategies. In: Apps M, Price DT (eds) Forest ecosystems, forest management and the global carbon cycle. Springer,Berlin, pp 217–232Google Scholar
  65. Seely B, Welham C, Kimmins H (2002) Carbon sequestration in a boreal forest ecosystem: results from the ecosystem simulation model, FORESCAST. Forest Ecology and Management 169:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Strandman H, Väisänen H, Kellomäki S (1993) A procedure for generating synthetic weather records in conjunction of climatic scenario for modelling of ecological impacts of changing climate in boreal conditions. Ecological Modelling 70:195–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Talkkari A (1998) The development of forest resources and potential wood yield in Finland under changing climatic conditions. Forest Ecology and Management 106:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thornley JHM, Cannell MGR (2000) Managing forests for wood yield and carbon storage: a theoretical study. Tree Physiology 20:477–484Google Scholar
  69. Thornley, JHM, Cannell MGR (2001) Managing soil carbon storage response to temperature: an hypothesis. Annals of Botany 87:591–598Google Scholar
  70. von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153:376–387Google Scholar
  71. Vucetich JA, Reed DD, Breymeyer A, Degórski M, Mroz GD, Solon J, Roo-Zielinska E, Noble R (2000) Carbon pools and ecosystem properties along a latitudinal gradient in northern Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) forests. Forest Ecology and Management 136:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yrjölä T (2002) Forest management guidelines and practises in Finland, Sweden and Norway. European Forest Institute. Internal Report 11:1–46Google Scholar
  73. Wang K-Y, Kellomäki S, Laitinen K (1996) Acclimation of photosynthetic parameters in Scots pine after three years exposure to elevated temperature and CO2. Agricultural and Forestry Meteorology 82:195–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo
    • 1
  • Heli Peltola
    • 1
  • Elemer Briceño-elizondo
    • 1
  • Seppo Kellomäki
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of JoensuuJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations