Learning to Adapt: Organisational Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts

Abstract

Analysis of human adaptation to climate change should be based on realistic models of adaptive behaviour at the level of organisations and individuals. The paper sets out a framework for analysing adaptation to the direct and indirect impacts of climate change in business organisations with new evidence presented from empirical research into adaptation in nine case-study companies. It argues that adaptation to climate change has many similarities with processes of organisational learning. The paper suggests that business organisations face a number of obstacles in learning how to adapt to climate change impacts, especially in relation to the weakness and ambiguity of signals about climate change and the uncertainty about benefits flowing from adaptation measures. Organisations rarely adapt ‘autonomously’, since their adaptive behaviour is influenced by policy and market conditions, and draws on resources external to the organisation. The paper identifies four adaptation strategies that pattern organisational adaptive behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Burton, I.: 1997, ‘Vulnerability and adaptive response in the context of climate and climate change,’ Climate Change 36(1–2), 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adger, W., Neil, P., Kelly, M., and Huu Ninh, N.: 2001, Living with environmental change: social vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience in Vietnam, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aldrich, H. and Auster, E.: 1986, Even dwarfs started small: liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications, in Staw, B. and Cummings, L (ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT, pp. 165–198.

  4. Arnell, N. W.: 2003, ‘Effects of IPCC SRES emissions scenarios on river runoff: a global perspective,’ Hydrology and Earth System Science 7, 619–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnell, N. W. and Delaney, E. K.: 2003, Adapting to climate change: water supply in England and Wales, ADAPT Project paper, Department of Geography, University of Southampton, Southampton, October.

  6. Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. L.: 2003, ‘Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited,’ Academy of Management Review 28(2), 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chakravarthy, B.: 1982, ‘Adaptation: a promising metaphor for strategic management,’ Academy of Management Review 7(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Collis, D. J.: 1994, ‘Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities?,’ Strategic Management Journal 15, 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G.: 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daft, R. L. and Weick, K. E.: 1984, ‘Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems,’ Academy of Management Review 9(2), 284–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Downing, T. E., Olsthoorn, A. A., and Tol, R. S. J.: 1996, Climate change and extreme events: altered risks, socio-economic impacts and policy responses, ECU Report No 12/IVM Report No R 96/4, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

  12. Easterling, W. E., Crosson, P. R., Rosenberg, N. J., McKenney, M. S., Katz, L. A., and Lemon, K. M.: 1993, ‘Agricultural impacts of and responses to climate change in the Missouri-Iowa-Nebraska-Kansas region,’ Climate Change, 24(1–2), 23–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenhardt, K.: 1989, ‘Building theory from case study research,’ Academy of Management Review 14(3), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Environment Agency: 2001, Water Resources for the Future: A Strategy for England and Wales, Environment Agency, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Environment Agency: 2003, Water Resources Planning Guidelines. Supplementary Guidance Note 1: Treatment of Climate Change, Environment Agency, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Folke, C. et al.: 2002, Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Edita norstedts tryckeri AB, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gavetti, D. and Levinthal, D.: 2000, ‘Looking forward and look backward: cognitive and experiential search,’ Administrative Science Quarterly 45, 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Glantz, M. H.: 1988, Societal responses to climate change: forecasting by analogy, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Graves, H. M. and Philipson, M. C.: 2000, Potential implications of climate change in the built environment, FBE Report 2, Foundation for the Built Environment, London.

  20. Herrington, P.: 1996, Climate Change and the Demand for Water, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hertin, J., Berkhout, F., Delaney, K., and Arnell, N.: 2002, Business and climate change: measuring and enhancing adaptive capacity, Progress report: Preliminary results from the house building and water sector, SPRU/Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Brighton.

  22. Hulme, M. et al.: 2002, Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: The UKCIP02 Scientific Report, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich.

  23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC): 2001, Climate change 2001 – The Scientific Basis: Contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  24. Kasperson, J., Kasperson, R. E., and Turner, B. L.: 1995, Regions at risk: comparisons of threatened environments, United Nations University Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kelly, P. M. and Adger, W. N.: 2000, ‘Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation,’ Climatic Change, 47(4), 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Levitt, B. and March, J. G.: 1988, ‘Organizational Learning,’ Annual Review of Sociology 14, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lippman, S. and Rummelt, R. P.: 1982, ‘Uncertain imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition,’ Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. March, J.: 1991, ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning,’ Organization Science 2, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCarthy, J., Canziani, O., Laery, N., Dokken, D., and White, K.: 2001, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  30. Mendelsohn, R.: 2000, ‘Efficient adaptation to climate change,’ Climatic Change, 45(3–4), 583–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nelson, R. and Winter, S.: 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nonaka, I.: 1994, ‘A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,’ Organization Science 5, 14–37.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Parson, E. A. et al.: 2003, ‘Understanding climatic impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation in the United States: Building a capacity for assessment,’ Climatic Change 57(1–2), 9–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Reilly, J. and Schimmelpfennig, D.: 2000, ‘Irreversibility, uncertainty and learning: portraits of adaptation to long-term climate change,’ Climatic Change 45, 253–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schneider, S. H., Easterling, W. E., and Mearns, L. O.: 2000, ‘Adaptation: sensitivity to natural variability, agent assumptions and dynamic climatic changes,’ Climatic Change 45, 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Wandel, J.: 2000, ‘An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability,’ Climatic Change 45, 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Staber, U. and Sydow, J.: 2002, ‘Organizational adaptive capacity – a structuration perspective,’ Journal of Management Inquiry 11(4), 408–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Steinbrunner, J.: 1974, The cybernetic theory of decision, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Teece, D., Pisonao, G., and Shuen, A.: 1997, ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,’ Strategic Management Journal 18, 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tol, R. S. J., Fankhauser, S., and Smith, J. B.: 1998, ‘The scope for adaptation to climate change: what can we learn from the impact literature?,’ Global Environmental Change - Human and Policy Dimensions 8(2), 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  41. UK Water Industry Research: 2002, Uncertainty and Risk in Supply/Demand Forecasting – Final Report (Volumes A and B), Project Report CL-09, UKWIR Ltd., London.

  42. Yohe, G., Neumann, J. E., Marshall, P. B., and Ameden, H.: 1996, ‘The economic cost of greenhouse induced sea level rise for developed property in the United States. Climatic Change,’ 32(4), 387–410.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zollo, M. and Winter, S. G.: 2002, ‘Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities,’ Organization Science 13 (3), 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frans Berkhout.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berkhout, F., Hertin, J. & Gann, D.M. Learning to Adapt: Organisational Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts. Climatic Change 78, 135–156 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9089-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adaptive Capacity
  • Climate Change Impact
  • Adaptation Measure
  • Climate Sensitivity
  • Climate Change Adaptation