Towards a Multi-Criteria Methodology for Assessment of Geological Carbon Storage Options

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) could achieve drastic cuts in the CO2 emissions associated with fossil fuels in the near to medium term and has been promoted as a significant climate change mitigation option. As the profile of this family of technologies grows rapidly, there remain many uncertainties relating to its viability, effectiveness and desirability. In this paper we begin to map out some of the key issues associated with CCS, using a multi-criteria approach to explore how an (admittedly small) selection of stakeholders perceive alternative storage options and energy scenarios. We present five long-term scenarios describing alternative ways in which the UK energy system could develop and which deploy different levels of carbon storage. The key storage options considered are oil and gas fields (both disused and with enhanced oil recovery), traps in saline aquifers, saline aquifers outside traps and on-shore sites. The relative performance of the scenarios and the storage reservoirs included within them have been assessed against a set of socio-economic, technical and environmental criteria by a small selection of stakeholders to the carbon storage debate. Whilst we cannot make strong conclusions regarding precise stakeholder opinions at this stage due to the small size of the sample, the broad delineation of the arguments for and against CCS are evident. Multi-criteria assessment (MCA) appears to hold much potential as a useful tool for characterising and better understanding differences in stakeholder assessments of CCS and its implications, and for identifying options around which greater consensus on the desirability (or otherwise) of CCS as a mitigation strategy might emerge.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Audus, H.: 2001, ‘Leading options for the capture of CO2 at power stations’, in Williams, D., Durie, B., McMullan, P., Paulson, C., and Smith, A. (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia, pp. 91–96.

  2. Arthur, B.: 1989, ‘Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events’, Econ. J. 99, 106–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bentley, R. W.: 2002, ‘Global oil and gas depletion: An overview’, Energy Policy 30, 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. British Energy: 2002, Replace Nuclear with Nuclear, British Energy Submission to the Government's Review of Energy Policy.

  5. Brown, K., Adger, N., Tompkins, E., Bacon, P., Shin, D., and Young, K.: 2001, ‘Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management’, Ecol. Econ. 37, 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Curran, M. A.: 1996, Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment, McGraw-Hill, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DTI: 2001, Review of the Case for Government Support for Cleaner Coal Technology Demonstration Plant, Final Report, 13 December 2001, Department of Trade and Industry, London.

  8. DTI: 2003a, Our Energy Future: The Energy White Paper, HMG, London, Cm. 5761.

  9. DTI: 2003b, Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Report of DTI International Technology Service Mission to the USA and Canada, DTI/APGTF, Department of Trade and Industry, London.

  10. DTI: 2003c, A Review of the Feasibility of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in the UK, Cleaner Fossil Fuels Programme, September 2003, Department of Trade and Industry, London.

  11. Dodgson, J., Spackman, M., Pearman, A., and Phillips, L.: 2001, Multi-Criteria Analysis: A Manual, DTLR, available on-line: http://www.dtlr.gov.uk/about/multicriteria/index.htm

  12. Dutton, G.: 2002, Hydrogen Energy Technology, Tyndall Working Paper No. 17, available from www.tyndall.ac.uk

  13. DUKES: 2002, Digest of UK Energy Statistics, DTI, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eden, C. and Ackerman, F.: 1998, Making Strategy, The Journey of Strategic Management, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elewaut, E., Koelewijn, D., van der Straaten, R., Bailey, H., Holloway, S., Barbier, J., Lindeberg, E., Möller, H., and Gaida, K.: 1996, ‘Inventory of the theoretical storage capacity of the European Union and Norway’, in Holloway, S. (ed.), The Underground Disposal of Carbon dioxide, Final Report of the Joule II Project CT92–0031.

  16. Espie, A.: 2001, ‘Options for establishing a North Sea Geological Storage Hub’, in Williams, D., Durie, B., McMullan, P., Paulson, C., and Smith, A. (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia, pp. 266–271.

  17. Espie, A. A., Brand, P. J., Skinner, R. C., Hubbard, R. A., and Turan, H. I.: 2003, ‘Obstacles to the storage of CO2 through EOR operations in the North Sea’, in Gale, J., and Kaya, Y. (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Permagon Press, Elsevier, Oxford.

  18. Gough, C., Shackley, S., and Cannell, M.: 2002a, Evaluating the Options for Carbon Sequestration, Tyndall Centre Technical Report 2, available from http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/tech_reports/tech_reports.shtml.

  19. Gough, C., Taylor, I., and Shackley, S.: 2002b, ‘Burying carbon under the sea: An initial exploration of public opinions’, Energy Environ. 13(6), 883–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grimston, M. C., Katakoussis, V., Fouquet, R., van der Vorst, R., Pearson, P., and Leach, M.: 2001, ‘The European and global future potential of carbon dioxide sequestration in tackling climate change’, Climate Policy 1, 155-177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grove-White, R.: 1996, ‘Brent Spar Re-Wrote the Rules’, New Statesman, 20 June.

  22. Ha-Duong, M. and Keith, D.: 2003, ‘Carbon storage: The economic efficiency of storing CO2 in leaky reservoirs’, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 5, 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hawkins, D.: 2003, ‘Passing gas: Implications of leakage from geologic carbon storage sites’, in Gale, J. and Kaya, Y. (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Permagon Press, Elsevier, Oxford.

  24. Hepple, R. R. and Benson, S. M.: 2003, ‘Implications of Surface Seepage on the Effectiveness of Geological Storage of CO2 as a Climate Change Mitigation Strategy’, Greenhouse Gas Technol. 1, 261–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Herzog, H., Caldeira, K., and Reilly, J.: 2003, ‘An issue of permanence: Assessing the effectiveness of temporary carbon storage’, Climatic Change 59, 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Holloway, S. (ed.): 1996, The Underground Disposal of Carbon Dioxide, Final Report of the Joule II Project CT92–0031.

  27. Holloway, S.: 1997, ‘Safety of underground disposal of carbon dioxide’, Energy Conversion Manage. 38(Suppl.), S241–S245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. IAG: 2002, Long-Term Reductions in Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the UK: Report of an Interdepartmental Analysts Group, Department of Trade and Industry, London.

  29. IEA: 2000, Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, September 2000, Cheltenham, Glos.

  30. IEA: 2002, World Energy Outlook 2002, International Energy Agency, September 2002, Paris.

  31. IEA/OECD: 1990, Energy Balances of OECD Countries 1987–1988, International Energy Agency, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Johnston, P., Santillo, D., Stringer, R., Parmentier, R., Hare, B., and Krueger, M.: 1999, Ocean Disposal/Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuel Production and Use: An Overview of Rationale, Techniques and Implications, Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Technical Note 01/99, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon.

  33. Joubert, A. R., Leiman, A., de Klerk, H. M., Katua, S., and Aggenbach, J. C.: 1997, ‘Fynbos (Fine Bush) vegetation and the supply of water: A comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis’, Ecol. Econ. 22, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kasemir, B., Jager, J., Jaeger, C., and Gardner, M.: 2003, Public Participation in Sustainability Science, A Handbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Keeney, R. and Raiffa, H.: 1993, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lenstra, W. J. and Engelenburg, B. C. W.: 2001, ‘Climate policy, CO2 storage and public perception’, in Williams, D., Durie, B., McMullan, P., Paulson, C., and Smith, A. (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia, pp. 31–39.

  37. Lenstra, W. J. and Engelenburg, B. C. W.: 2002, Legal and Policy Aspects: Impact on the Development of CO 2 Storage, Ministry of Environment, The Netherlands, paper submitted to IPCC Scoping Meeting on Carbon Storage, Regina, December 2002.

  38. Lozza, G. and Chiesa, P.: 2000a, ‘Natural gas decarbonisation to reduce CO2 emission from combined cycles. Part A. Partial oxidation’, ASME.

  39. Lozza, G. and Chiesa, P.: 2000b, ‘Natural gas decarbonisation to reduce CO2 emission from combined cycles. Part B. Steam-methane reforming’, ASME.

  40. Mander, S.: 2003, Integrated Assessment of Wind Energy: A Multi Criteria Analysis of Discourse Coalitions in North West England, Ph.D. Thesis, UMIST.

  41. Marchetti, C.: 1977, ‘On geoengineering and the CO2 problem’, Climatic Change 1, 59-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Morris, P. and Therivel, R.: 2001, Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment, Spon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nakicenovic, N., Gruebler, A., and McDonald, A. (eds.): 1998, Global Energy Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nakicenovic, N. and Swart, R. (eds.): 2000, Emissions Scenarios 2000: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G.: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  46. OSPAR Commission: 2003, Summary Record, 03/17/1-(A-B)-E, Bremen 23–27 June 2003.

  47. Parson, E. A. and Keith, D. W.: 1998, ‘Fossil fuels without CO2 emissions’, Science 282(5391)(6), 1053–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pearce, D. and Turner, K.: 1989, Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment, Prentice Hall, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  49. PIU: 2002, The Energy Review, A Performance and Innovation Unit Report, February 2002, Cabinet Office, London.

  50. Purdy, R. and Macrory, R.: 2004, Review of the Legal Issues Concerning Geological Carbon Sequestration, Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 45, 66 pp., archived at: http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/working_papers/working_papers.shtml

  51. RCEP: 2000, Energy – The Changing Climate, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Renn, O., Webler, T. and Wiedemann, P.: 1995, Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation – Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Riemer, P., Audus, H. and Smith, A.: 1999, CO 2 Capture from Power Stations, International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, Glos.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rutter, E.: 2002, Communication submitted to Tyndall Centre online discussion forum on carbon storage, November 2002, archived at: http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/forum/messages/archive/sequestration.html.

  55. Saaty, T.: 1988, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Penns.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sen, P. and Yang, J.-B.: 1998, Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design, Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Shackley, S., Cockerill, T., and Holloway, S.: 2003, ‘Carbon capture and storage: Panacea or long-term problem?’, Climate Change Manage. 6(September 2003), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Shackley, S., McLachlan, C., and Gough, C.: 2004, The Public Perception of Carbon Capture and Storage, Tyndall Working Paper 44, archived at: http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/working_papers/working_papers.shtml.

  59. Stevens, S. and Gale, J.: 2000, ‘Geologic CO2 sequestration’, Oil Gas J., 15 May 2000.

  60. Stewart, T.: 1992, ‘A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice’, Omega 20(5-6), 569–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Stewart, T. J. and Joubert, A.: 1998, ‘Conflicts between conservation goals and land use for exotic plantations in South Africa’, in Beinat, E. and Nijkamp, P. (eds.), Multicriteria Analysis for Land Use Management, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Stewart, T. J. and Scott, L.: 1995, ‘A scenario based framework for multi-criteria analysis in water resources planning’, Water Resour. Res. 31, 2835–2843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Stirling, A. and Mayer, S.: 1999, Confronting Risk: A Pilot Multi-Criteria Mapping of a GM Crop in Agricultural Systems in the UK, Final Report prepared for the UK Roundtable on Genetic Modification.

  64. Stirling, A. and Mayer, S.: 2001, ‘A Novel Approach to the Appraisal of Technological Risk: A Multi-Criteria Mapping of a Genetically Modified Crop’, Environ. Plan. C: Government Policy 19, 29–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. van der Heijden, K.: 1997, Scenarios – The Art of Strategic Conversation, Wiley, Circencester, Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  66. van der Meer, L.: 1995, ‘The CO2 storage efficiency of aquifers’, Energy Conversion Manage. 36(6-9), 513-518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. USDOE: 2002, CO 2 Capture and Storage in Geologic Formations, White Paper prepared for the National Climate Change Technology Initiative, US Department of Energy, January 2002.

  68. Wilson, E. J. and Keith, D.: 2003, ‘Geologic carbon storage: Understanding the rules of the underground’, in Gale, J. and Kaya, Y. (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Permagon Press, Elsevier, Oxford.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clair Gough.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gough, C., Shackley, S. Towards a Multi-Criteria Methodology for Assessment of Geological Carbon Storage Options. Climatic Change 74, 141–174 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-0425-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Carbon Storage
  • Saline Aquifer
  • Deep Saline Aquifer
  • Future Energy System
  • Parasitic Energy