Climatic Change

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 19–38 | Cite as

Water Availability, Degree Days, and the Potential Impact of Climate Change on Irrigated Agriculture in California

  • Wolfram Schlenker
  • W. Michael Hanemann
  • Anthony C. Fisher
Article

Abstract

We use the geo-referenced June Agricultural Survey of the U.S. Department of Agriculture to match values of individual farms in California with a measure of water availability as mediated through irrigation districts, and degree days, a nonlinear transformation of temperature, controlling for other influences on value such as soil quality, to examine the potential effects of climate change on irrigated agriculture in California. Water availability strongly capitalizes into farmland values. The predicted decrease in water availability in the latest climate change scenarios downscaled to California can therefore be expected to have a significant negative impact on the value of farmland.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burness, H. S. and Quirk, J. P.: 1979, ‘Appropriative water rights and the efficient allocation of resources’, Am. Econ. Rev. 69(1), 25–37.Google Scholar
  2. Burness, H. S. and Quirk, J. P.: 1980, ‘Economic aspects of appropriative water rights’, J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 7(4), 372–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conley, T. G.: 1999, ‘GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence’, J. Econometrics 92(1), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crouter, J. P.: 1987, ‘Hedonic estimation applied to a water rights market’, Land Econ. 63(3), 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darwin, R.: 1999, ‘The impact of global warming on agriculture: A Ricardian analysis: comment’, Am. Econ. Rev. 89(4), 1049–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deschenes, O. and Greenstone, M.: 2004, Economic impacts of climate change: Evidence from agricultural profits and random fluctuations in weather. NBER working paper 10663, August 2004.Google Scholar
  7. Doll, J. P.: 1967, ‘An analytical technique for estimating weather indexes from meteorological measurements’, J. Farm Econ. 49(1), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faux, J. and Perry, G. M.: 1999, ‘Estimating irrigation water value using hedonic price analysis: A case study in Malheur County, Oregon’, Land Econ. 75(3), 440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardner, B. D. and Huffaker, R. G.: 1988, ‘Cutting the loss from federal irrigation subsidies’, Choices, 1988, Forth Quarter, 24–26.Google Scholar
  10. Gleick, P. H. and Chalecki, E. L.: 1999, ‘The impacts of climatic changes for water resources of the Colorado and Sacramento-San Juaquin River Basins’, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 35(6), 1429–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamlet, A. F. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: 1999, ‘Effects of climate change on hydrology and water resources in the Columbia River Basin’, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 35(6), 1597–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hartman, L. M. and Anderson, R. L.: 1962, ‘Estimating the value of irrigation water from farm sales data in Northeastern Colorado’, J. Farm Econ. 44, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huffaker, R. G. and Gardner, B. D.: 1986, ‘The distribution of economic rents arising from subsidized water When land is leased’, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 68(2), 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, S. R. and Haigh, P. A.: 1970, ‘Agricultural land price differentials and their relationship to potentially modifiable aspects of the climate’, Rev. Econ. Stat. 52(2), 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katherine H., et al.: 2004, ‘Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101(34), 12422–12427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaufmann, R. K.: 1998, ‘The impact of climate change on US agriculture: A response to Mendelsohn et al. (1994)’, Ecol. Econ. 26, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leamer, E. E.: 1983, ‘Let’s take the Con out of econometrics’, Am. Econ. Rev. 73(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
  18. Lehman, R. L.: 1987, ‘Probability distributions of monthly degree day variables at U.S. Stations. Part I. Estimating the mean value and variance from temperature data’, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorology 26(3), 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lettenmaier, D. P. and Sheer, D. P.: 1991, ‘Climatic sensitivity of California water resources’, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 117(1), 108–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leung, L. R. and Wigmosta, M. S.: 1999, ‘Potential climate change impacts on mountain watersheeds in the Pacific Northwest’, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 35(6), 1463–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCabe, Jr. G. J. and Wolock, D. M.: 1992, ‘Sensitivity of irrigation demand in humid-temperate region to hypothetical climatic change’, Water Resour. Bull. 28(3), 535–543.Google Scholar
  22. Mendelsohn, R. and Dinar, A.: 2003, ‘Climate, water, and agriculture’, Land Econ. 79(3), 328–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W. D., and Shaw, D.: 1994, ‘The impact of global warming on agriculture: A Ricardian analysis’, Am. Econ. Rev. 84(4), 753–771.Google Scholar
  24. Moulton, B. R.: 1986, ‘Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates’, J. Econ. 32(3), 385–397.Google Scholar
  25. Mundlak, Y.: 1961, ‘Empirical production function free of management bias’, J. Farm Econ. 43(1), 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oury, B.: 1965, ‘Allowing for weather in crop production model building’, J. Farm Econ. 47(2), 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plantinga, A. J., Lubowski, R. N., and Stavins, R. N.: 2002, ‘The effects of potential land development on agricultural land prices’, J. Urban Econ. 52(3), 561–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Renshaw, E. F.: 1958, ‘Scientific appraisal’, Natl. Tax J. 11(4), 314–322.Google Scholar
  29. Ritchie, J. T. and NeSmith, D. S.: 1991, ‘Temperature and crop development. In: Hanks J, Richie JT (eds) Modeling plant and soil systems, Agronomy 31. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 5–29.Google Scholar
  30. Schlenker, W., Hanemann, W. M., and Fisher, A. C.: 2005, ‘Will U.S. agriculture really benefit from global warming? Accounting for irrigation in the hedonic approach’, Am. Econ. Rev. 95(1), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schlenker, W., Hanemann, W. M., and Fisher, A. C.: 2006, ‘The impact of global warming on U.S. agriculture: An econometric analysis of optimal growing conditions,’ Rev. Econ. Stat. 88(1), 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Selby, H. E.: 1945, ‘Factors affecting value of land and water in irrigated land’, J. Land Public Utility Econ. 21(3), 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thom, H. C. S.: 1966, ‘Normal degree days above any base by the universal truncation coefficient’, Mon. Weather Rev. 94(7), 461–465.Google Scholar
  34. Thom, H. C. S.: 1954, ‘The rational relationship between heating degree days and temperature’, Mon. Weather Rev. 82(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. United States Department of Agriculture (1994) State Soil Geographic Data Base (STATSGO), Technical Report Miscellaneous Publication Number 1492, Natural Resource Conversation Service. National Soil Service Center.Google Scholar
  36. United States Department of Agriculture (1995) Soil Survey Geographic Data Base (SSURGO), Technical Report Miscellaneous Publication Number 1527, Natural Resources Conversation Service. National Soil Survey Center.Google Scholar
  37. United States Department of Agriculture (2000) Summary Report 1997 National Resources Inventory, Technical Report, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Iowa State University Statistical Laboratory.Google Scholar
  38. U.S. Census Bureau (2002) 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Summary Population and Housing Characteristics. PHC-1-6 California.Google Scholar
  39. Whittlesey, N. K. and Herrell, J. P.: 1987, ‘Impact of energy cost increases on irrigated land values’, West. J. Agric. Econ. 12(1), 1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfram Schlenker
    • 1
  • W. Michael Hanemann
    • 2
  • Anthony C. Fisher
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics and School of International and Public AffairsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations