Climatic Change

, Volume 70, Issue 1–2, pp 191–200 | Cite as

Achieving Adequate Adaptation in Agriculture

  • Ian BurtonEmail author
  • Bo Lim


This paper reviews the prospects for adaptation in world agriculture in the face of climate change. The record of experience from previous decades demonstrates a considerable capacity to adapt and there is general optimism that successful adaptation will be maintained. There are some grounds for concern because of the uncertainty surrounding global climate projections and the probability of considerable regional variation in impacts. While world production may not be adversely affected, the prospects are not so encouraging for low latitude agricultural regions, in part because of lower capacity to adapt. Attention has focused on the farming community itself as the place where adaptation takes place, but now the processes of globalization are placing adaptation more in the hands of agri-business, national policy makers, and the international political economy. The continued success of adaptation rests more heavily on actions at the national level in the context of changing technology and world trade liberalization. An adaptation policy framework is suggested as a vehicle to help understand and facilitate adaptation in this changing context.


Political Economy World Trade Trade Liberalization Climate Projection Policy Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Burton, I., Kates, R. W. and White, G. F.: 1993, The Environment as Hazard, Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Burton, I. and Lim, B.: 2001, An Adaptation Policy Framework: Capacity Building for Stage II Adaptation, UNDP-GEF, National Communications Support Programme, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Burton, I. and van Aalst, M.: 1999, Come Hell or High Water – Integrating Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation into Bank Work, Environment Paper No. 72, World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  4. IPCC: 1996, Climate Change 1995. Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. See especially Reilly J. et al., Agriculture in a Changing Climate: Impacts and Adaptations, pp. 427–467.Google Scholar
  5. IPCC: 2001, Climate Change 2001. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Report of Working Group II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Lim, B., Burton, I. and Huq, S.: 2004, The Adaptation Policy Framework, UNDP-GEF, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Parry, M., Cynthia, R., Ana, I., Günther, F., and Mathew, L.: 1999, ‘Climate change and world food security: A new assessment’, Global Environ. Change 9, S51–S67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Parry, M. C. and Carter, T.: 1998, Climate Impact and Adaptation Assessment, Earthscan Publications, London, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T. and Wandel, J.: 2000, ‘An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability’, Clim. Change 45, 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smit, B. and Pilifosova, O.: 2001, Adaptation to Climate Change in the Context of Sustainable Development, pp. 877–912 in IPCC 2001, Op. Cit.Google Scholar
  11. Spanger-Siegfried, E. and Dougherty, B.: 2004, User’s Guide Book for the Adaptation Policy Framework, UNDP-GEF, New York, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Meteorological Service of CanadaCanada
  2. 2.UNDP-GEFNew YorkU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations