Climatic Change

, Volume 72, Issue 1–2, pp 37–56 | Cite as

Changes in Vascular Plant Biodiversity in the Netherlands in the 20th Century Explained by their Climatic and other Environmental Characteristics

  • Wil L. M. TamisEmail author
  • Maarten Van't Zelfde
  • Ruud Van Der Meijden
  • Helias A. Udo De Haes


In the Netherlands nation-wide databases are available with about 10 million records of occurrences of vascular plant species in the 20th century on a scale of approximately 1 km2. These data were analysed with a view to identifying relationships between changes in botanical biodiversity and climatic and other environmental factors. Prior to analysis the data were corrected for several major forms of survey bias. The records were broken down into three periods: 1902–1949, 1975–1984 and 1985–1999. Using multiple regression analysis, differences between successive periods were related to plant functional characteristics as explanatory variables. Between the periods 1902–1949 and 1975–1984 there were small but significant increases in the presence of both thermophilic (‘warm’) and psychrophilic (‘cold’) species. However, in the final decades of the 20th century there was a marked increase in thermophilic species only, coinciding with the marked increase in ambient temperature observed during this period, evidence at least of a rapid response of Dutch flora to climate change. Urbanisation was also examined as an alternative explanation for the increase in thermophilic plant species and was found to explain only 50% of the increased presence of such species in the final decades of the 20th century. Besides temperature-related effects, the most important change during the 20th century was a strong decline in oligotrophic and a marked increase in eutrophic plant species.


Plant Species Regression Analysis Explanatory Variable 20th Century Multiple Regression Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alkemade, J. R. M., Bakkenes, M., Ihle, F., Latour, J. B., and Leemans, R.: 1999, ‘Assessing effects of climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants’, in Van Oene, H., Berendse, F., Alkemade, J. R. M., Bakkenes, M., Ihle, F., and De Kovel, C. G. F. (eds.), Assessment of Long-Term Effects of Climate Change on Biodiversity and Vulnerability of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Dutch National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, Wageningen/Bilthoven, pp. 15–42.Google Scholar
  2. Andrés, I. M.: 1993, ‘A revised list of the European C4 plants’, Photosynthetica 26, 323–331.Google Scholar
  3. Bakkenes, M., Alkemade, J. R. M., Ihle, F., Leemans, R., and Latour, J. B.: 2002, ‘Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050’, Global Change Biol. 8, 390–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox, D. R. and Snell, E. J.: 1989, Analysis of Binary Data, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Damon, P. E., Eastoe, C. J., Hughes, M. K., Kalin, R. M., Long, A., and Peristykh, A. N.: 1998, ‘Secular variation of delta-14C during the medieval solar maximum: A progress report’, Radiocarbon 40, 343–350.Google Scholar
  6. Denters, T.: 1999, ‘De flora van het Urbaan district’, Gorteria 25, 65–76.Google Scholar
  7. Ellenberg, H., Weber, H. E., Düll, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W., and Paulissen, D.: 1992, ‘Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa’, Scripta Geobot. 18, 1–258.Google Scholar
  8. Ehrlicher, J. R.: 1978, ‘Implications of quantum yield differences on the distribution of C3 and C4 grasses’, Oecologia (Berlin) 31, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gitay, H., Suárez, A., Watson, R. T., and Dokken, D. J. (eds.): 2002, Climate Change and Biodiversity, IPCC Technical Paper V, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. Gomez, F., Gaja, E., and Reig, A.: 1998, ‘Vegetation and climatic changes in a city’, Ecol. Eng. 10, 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grabherr, G., Gottfried, M., and Pauli, H.: 1994, ‘Climate effects on mountain plants’, Nature 369, 348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Grove, J. M.: 1988, The Little Ice Age, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  13. Groen, C. L. G., Duistermaat, H., Lemaire, A. J., Van der Meijden, R., Peterbroers, T. F., and Van der Slikke, W. J.: 1997, ‘Hogere planten’, in Veling, K., Verheggen, L., and Van Halder, I. (eds.), Jaarboek Natuur 1997; de winst- en verliesrekening van de Nederlandse natuur, KNNV, Utrecht, pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
  14. Heij, G. J. and Erisman, J. W. (eds.): 1997, Acid Atmospheric Deposition and its Effects on Terrestrial Ecosystems in the Netherlands, Studies in Environmental Science 69, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  15. Hengeveld, R.: 1985, ‘Dynamics of Dutch beetle species during the twentieth century (Coleoptera, Carabidae)’, J. Biogeogr. 12, 389–411.Google Scholar
  16. Hill, M. O., Mountford, J. O., Roy, D. B., and Bunce, R. G. H.: 1999, Ellenberg's Indicator Values for British Plants, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology/Department of Environment, Transport and Regions (NERC), Grange-over-Sands.Google Scholar
  17. Huntley, B.: 1991, ‘How plants respond to climate change: Migration rates, individualism and the consequences for plant communities’, Ann. Bot. 67, 15–22.Google Scholar
  18. Ihle, F., Bakkenes, M., and Alkemade, J. R. M.: 1999, ‘Assessing impacts of climate change on macro-scale ecosystem distribution in Europe’, in Van Oene, H., Berendse, F., Alkemade, J. R. M., Bakkenes, M., Ihle, F., and De Kovel, C. G. F. (eds.), Assessment of Long-Term Effects of Climate Change on Biodiversity and Vulnerability of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Dutch National Research Programma on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, Wageningen/Bilthoven, pp. 43–73.Google Scholar
  19. IPCC: 2001, in McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., and White, K. S. (eds.), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation & Vulnerability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Jongman, R. H., Ter Braak, C. J. F., and Van Tongeren, O. F. R.: 1987, Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, PUDOC, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  21. Klijn, F.: 1997, A Hierarchical Approach to Ecosystems and its Implications for Ecological Land Classification, Doctor of Natural Sciences Thesis, CML, Leiden.Google Scholar
  22. Kloosterman, F. H. and Van der Meijden, R.: 1994, Eindverslag digitalisering van het IVON-archief (historisch floristisch bestand) van het Rijksherbarium te Leiden, TNO, Delft.Google Scholar
  23. Können, G. P. (ed.): 1999, De toestand van het klimaat in Nederland 1999, KNMI, De Bilt.Google Scholar
  24. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A.: 1989, Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn., Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  25. Mennema, J., Quené-Boterenbrood, A. J., and Plate, C. L. (eds.): 1980, Atlas van de Nederlandse flora 1. Uitgestorven en zeer zeldzame planten, Kosmos, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  26. Mennema, J., Quené-Boterenbrood, A. J., and Plate, C. L. (eds.): 1985, Atlas van de Nederlandse flora 2. Zeldzame en vrij zeldzame planten, Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, A. J.: 1990, Subset Selection in Regression, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  28. Montgomery, D. C. and Peck, E. A.: 1992, Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 2nd edn., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Parmesan, C. and Yohe, G.: 2003, ‘A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems’, Nature 421, 37–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Plate, C. L.: 1990, ‘From flora statistics to an ecotope classification’, Stat. J. United Nations ECE 7, 85–99.Google Scholar
  31. Pynakov, V. I. and Mokronosov, A. T.: 1993, ‘General trends in changes of the earth's vegetation related to global warming’, Russ. J. Plant Phys. 40, 443–458.Google Scholar
  32. Rich, T. C. G. and Woodruff, E. R.: 1992, ‘The influence of recording bias in botanical surveys: Examples from the BSBI Monitoring Scheme 1987–1988’, Watsonia 19, 73–95.Google Scholar
  33. Root, T. L., Price, J. T., Hall, K. R., Schneider, S. H., Rosenzweig, C., and Pounds, A.: 2003, ‘Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants’, Nature 421, 57–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Runhaar, J., Van Walsum, P. E. V., and Prins, A. H.: 2002, ‘Effects of climate and land use change on hydrological conditions and species composition in Dutch riverine grasslands (Calthion, Junco-Molinion)’, Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 2, 219–226.Google Scholar
  35. Schaffers, A. P. and Sýkora, K. V.: 2000, ‘Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: A comparison with field measurements’, J. Vegetation Sci. 11, 225–244.Google Scholar
  36. Snyder, J. P.: 1987, Map Projections –A Working Manual, US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1395, Supt. of Docs. No. 119.16.1395, Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
  37. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J.: 1969, Biometry, the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, W.H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco.Google Scholar
  38. Szarek, S. R.: 1979, ‘The occurrence of Crassulacean acid metabolism: A supplementary list during 1976 to 1979’, Photosynthetica 13, 467–473.Google Scholar
  39. Szarek, S. R. and Ting, I. P.: 1977, ‘The occurrence of Crassulacean acid metabolism among plants’, Photosynthetica 11, 330–342.Google Scholar
  40. Ter Braak, C. J. F. and Barendregt, L. G.: 1986, ‘Weighted averaging of species indicator values’, Math. Biosci. 78, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. UNCED: 1992, The Convention on Biodiversity, UNCED, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  42. Van Boxel, J. H. and Cammeraat, E.: 1999, ‘Wordt Nederland steeds natter? Een analyse van de neerslag in deze eeuw’, Meteorologica 8, 11–15.Google Scholar
  43. Van der Linden, J. A.: 1981, Topographische en Militaire kaart van het Koningrijk der Nederlanden, Unieboek, Bussum.Google Scholar
  44. Van der Meij, T. and Van Duuren, L.: 2000, ‘Veranderingen in oppervlakten van natuurtypen tussen 1950 en 1990’, Kwartaalberichten Milieu CBS 17, 10–15.Google Scholar
  45. Van der Meijden, R.: 1993, Flora en Fauna 2030. Hogere planten; een geannoteerde soortenlijst, Proefproject Flora en Fauna 2030, Achtergrondreeks, deel 2, FLORON/Min, VROM, Leiden/The Hague.Google Scholar
  46. Van der Meijden, R.: 1998, ‘Frustratie en inspiratie’, in Van Strien W. (ed.), De toekomst in de kijker; een overzicht van het project Flora en Fauna 2030, VROM, The Hague, pp. 21–23.Google Scholar
  47. Van der Meijden, R., Odé, B., Groen, C. L. G., Witte, J. P. M., and Bal, D.: 2000, ‘Bedreigde en kwetsbare vaatplanten in Nederland; Basisrapport met voorstel voor de Rode Lijst’, Gorteria 26, 85–208.Google Scholar
  48. Van der Meijden, R., Weeda, E. J., and Plate, C. L. (eds.): 1989, Atlas van de Nederlandse flora 3. Minder zeldzame en algemene soorten, Rijksherbarium/CBS, Leiden/Voorburg.Google Scholar
  49. Van der Meijden, R., Groen, C. L. G., Vermeulen, J. J., Peterbroers, T., Van't Zelfde, M., and Witte, J. P. M.: 1996, De landelijke floradatabank FLORBASE-1; eindrapport. RHHB/CML/UL-WHH, Leiden/Wageningen.Google Scholar
  50. Van Dorland, R.: 1999, Radiation and Climate: From Radiative Transfer Modelling to Global Temperature Response, Doctor of Natural Sciences Thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  51. Van Duuren, L. and Schaminée, J. J.: 1999, ‘Bedreiging van plantengemeenschappen van de kust, akkers, ruderale standplaatsen en muren’, Kwartaalberichten Milieu CBS 1999, pp. 26–31.Google Scholar
  52. Van Herk, C. M., Aptroot, A., and Van Dobben, H. F.: 2002, ‘Long-term monitoring in the Netherlands suggests that lichens respond to global warming’, Lichenologist 34, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Strien, A., Hilgen, P., Thissen, J., and Meijer, R.: 1997, ‘Wordt Nederland soortenarmer? Een graadmeter voor de veranderingen in de soortenrijkdom in Nederland’, Kwartaalberichten Milieu CBS 1997, pp. 27–32.Google Scholar
  54. Van Vliet, A. J. H., De Groot, R. S.: 2001, ‘Climate change induced changes in timing of flowering and leaf unfolding of plant species in the Netherlands’, in Van Oene, H., Ellis, W. N., Heijmans, M. M. P. D., Mauquoy, D., Tamis, W. L. M., Van Vliet, A. J. H., Berendse, F., Van Geel, B., Van der Meijden, R., and Ulenberg, S. A. (eds.), Long-Term Effects of Climate Change on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes, Dutch National Research Programma on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, Wageningen/Bilthoven, pp. 51–67.Google Scholar
  55. Van Vliet, A. J. H., Overeem, A., De Groot, R. S., and Spieksma, A. F. G.: 2002, ‘The influence of temperature and climate change on the timing of pollen release in the Netherlands’, Int. J. Climatol. 22, 1757–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Voorst, A.: 2001, Het C4-Fotosynthese Systeem. Een literatuurstudie met speciale aandacht voor C4-species in Nederland, Vakgroep Vegetatiekunde, Plantenoecologie en Onkruidkunde, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  57. VSN: 2000, GenStat for Windows, 5th edn., VSN Int. Ltd, Oxford.Google Scholar
  58. Wagner, F., Below, R., De Klerk, P., Dilcher, D. L., Joosten, H., Kürschner, W. M., and Visser, H.: 1996, ‘A natural experiment on plant acclimation: Lifetime stomatal frequency response of an individual tree to annual atmospheric CO2 increase’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11705–11708.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Wamelink, G. W. W., Joosten, V., Van Dobben, H. F., and Berendse, F.: 2002, ‘Validity of Ellenberg indicator values judged from physico-chemical field measurements’, J. Vegetation Sci. 13, 269–278.Google Scholar
  60. Walther, G. R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J. C., Fromertin, J. M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., and Bairlein, F.: 2002, ‘Ecological responses to recent climate change’, Nature 416, 389–395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Weeda, E. J.: 1990, ‘Over de plantengeografie van Nederland’, in Van der Meijden, R., Heukels' flora van Nederland, 21st edn., Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, pp. 16–24.Google Scholar
  62. Weeda, E. J., Van der Meijden, R., and Bakker, P. A.: 1990, ‘FLORON-Rode Lijst 1990; Rode Lijst van de in Nederland verdwenen en bedreigde planten (Pterophyta en Spermatophyta) over de periode 1.I.1980–1.I.1990’, Gorteria 16, 2–26.Google Scholar
  63. Weeda, E. J., Schaminée, J. J., and Van Duuren, L.: 2000, Atlas van de plantengemeenschappen in Nederland; deel 1 wateren, moerassen en natte heiden, KNNV, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  64. Wiertz, J.: 1992, Schatting van ontbrekende vocht- en stikstofindicatiegetallen van Ellenberg (1979), Instituut voor Bos- en Natuuronderzoek (IBN-DLO), Wageningen.Google Scholar
  65. Witte, J. P. M.: 1998, National Water Management and the Value of Nature, Doctor of Natural Sciences Thesis, Agricultural University Wageningen, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  66. Witte, J. P. M. and Van der Meijden, R.: 1995, ‘Verspreidingskaarten van de botanische kwaliteit in Nederland uit FLORBASE’, Gorteria 21, 3–59.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wil L. M. Tamis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maarten Van't Zelfde
    • 2
  • Ruud Van Der Meijden
    • 1
  • Helias A. Udo De Haes
    • 1
  1. 1.Nationaal Herbarium Nederland/Leiden University BranchLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute of Environmental SciencesLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations