Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Incorporating Agency Into Climate Change Risk Assessments

An Editorial Comment

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human agency has been viewed as a problem for climate change assessments because of its contribution to uncertainty. In this editorial, I outline the advantages of agency in managing climate change risks, describing how those advantages can be placed within a probabilistic framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andronova, N. G. and Schlesinger, M. E.: 2001, ‘Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity’, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 106, 22605–22611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, T.: 2003, Environmental Risk and Sustainability, in Beer, T. and Ismail-Zadeh, A. (eds.), Risk Science and Sustainability: Science for Reduction of Risk and Sustainable Development for Society, (NATO Science Series. Series II, Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry; 112), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, pp. 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, N.: 2003, Vulnerability, Risk and Adaptation: A Conceptual Framework, Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 38, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich UK, 16 pp.

  • Burton, I., Huq, S., Lim, B., Pilifosova, O. and Schipper, E. L.: 2002, ‘From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: The shaping of adaptation policy’, Clim. Policy 2, 145--159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, T. R. and La Rovere, E. L.: 2001, ‘Developing and Applying Scenarios’, in McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., and White, K. S. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 145–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaños, H.: 2003, ‘Disasters at the interface of science and society provoke thought’, EOS 84(47), 521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corfee-Morlot, J. and Höhne, N.: 2003, ‘Climate change: Long-term targets and short-term commitments’, Global Environ. Change, 13, 277–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessai, S. and Hulme, M.: 2003, Does climate policy need probabilities? Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 34, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich UK, 42 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessai, S., Adger, W. N., Hulme, M., Turnpenny, J., Köhler1, J., and Warren, R.: 2004, ‘Defining and experiencing dangerous climate change’, Clim. Change 64, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, T. E. and Patwardhan, A.: 2004, ‘{Vulnerability assessment for climate adaptation}’, in Lim, B. (ed.), Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies and Measures, Cambridge University Press, New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enting, I. G.: 2002, Inverse Problems in Earth System Science: A Complex Systems Perspective, CSIRO Atmospheric Research Technical Paper No. 62, CSIRO Atmospheric Research, Melbourne, 36 pp. http://www.dar.csiro.au/publications/enting{_}2002c.pdf.

  • Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R., and Webster, M. D.: 2002, ‘Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations’, Science 295, 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J. M., Stouffer, R. J., Raper, S. C. B., Stott, P. A., and Rayner, N. A.: 2002, ‘An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity’, J. Clim. 15, 3117–3121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. and Burton, I.: 1971, The Hazardousness of a Place: A Regional Ecology of Damaging Events, University of Toronto, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howden, S. M. and Jones, R. N.: 2001, Costs and Benefits of CO2 Increase and Climate Change on the Australian Wheat Industry, Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia, http://www.greenhouse.gov.au/science/wheat/.

  • IPCC: 1990, Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment, in J. T. Houghton, Jenkins, G. J., and Ephraums, J. J. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 365 pp.

  • IPCC: 1997, An Introduction to Simple Climate Models Used in the IPCC Second Assessment Report, in Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Griggs, D. J., and Maskell, K. (eds.), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, 47 pp.

  • IPCC: 2001, Summary for Policymakers, in Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., Van Der Linden, P. J., and Xiaosu, D. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. N.: 2000, ‘Managing uncertainty in climate change projections – issues for impact assessment’, Clim. Change 45, 403–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.: 2003, Managing the Risk of Climate Change, Paper prepared for the OECD Project on the Benefits of Climate Policy, 12–13 December 2002, Paris, ENV/EPOC/GSP(2003)22/FINAL. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/6/12/19519189.pdf.

  • Jones, R. N. and Hennessy, K. J.: 2000, Climate Change Impacts in the Hunter Valley: A Risk Assessment of Heat Stress Affecting Dairy Cattle, CSIRO Atmospheric Research, Melbourne, 23 pp.

  • Jones, R. N. and Boer, R.: 2004, ‘{Assessing current climate risks}’, in Lim, B. (ed.), Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies and Measures, Cambridge University Press, New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. N. and Mearns, L. O.: 2004, ‘Assessing future climate risks’, in Lim, B. (ed.) Adaptation Policy Framework for Climate Change: Developing Stravegies, Policies and Measures, Cambridge University Press, New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., and Plattner, G. K.: 2002, ‘Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles’, Nature 416, 719–723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mastrandrea, M. D., and Schneider, S. H.: 2004, Probabilistic integrated assessment of “dangerous” climate change, Science, 304, 57–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G. and Henrion, M.: 1990, Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 332 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic, N. and Swart, R. (eds.): 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvy, J.: 1992, ‘Future studies and the human sciences: The case for normative scenarios’, Fut. Res. Quart. 8, 5–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patt, A. G. and Schrag, D. P.: 2003, ‘Using specific language to describe risk and probability’, Clim Change 61, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risbey, J. S.: 2004, ‘Agency and the assignment of probabilities to greenhouse emissions scenarios’, Clim. Change 67, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. H.: 2001, ‘What is ‘dangerous’ climate change?’, Nature 411, 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. H.: 2002, ‘Can we estimate the likelihood of climatic changes at 2100?’, Clim. Change 52, 441–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Street, R.: 1999, ‘The science of adaptation: A framework for assessment’, Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 4, 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B. and Pilifosova, O.: 2001, ‘Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity’, in McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., and White, K. S. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 877–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B. and Pilofosova, O.: 2003, ‘From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reduction’, in Smith, J. B., Klein, R. J. T., and Huq, S. (eds.), Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development, Imperial College Press, London, pp. 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., Schellnhuber, J.-J., and Mirza, M. M. Q.: 2001, ‘Vulnerability to Climate Change and Reason for Concern: A synthesis’, in McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., and White, K. S. (eds.): 2001, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 913-967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R. S. J. and de Vos, A. F. ‘A Bayesian statistical analysis of the enhanced greenhouse effect’, Clim. Change 38, 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, H., Folkert, R. J. M., Hoekstra, J., and De Wolff, J. J.: 2000, ‘Identifying key sources of uncertainty in climate change projections’, Clim. Change 45, 421–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. D.: 2003, ‘Communicating climate change uncertainty to policy-makers and the public’, Clim. Change 61, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. D., Babiker, M., Mayer, M., Reilly, J. M., Harnisch, J., Hyman, R., Sarofim, M. C., and Wang, C.: 2002, ‘Uncertainty in emissions projections for climate models’, Atmos. Environ. 36, 3659–3670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. D., Forest, C. E. Reilly, J., Babiker, M., Kicklighter, D., Mayer, M., Prinn, R., Sarofim, M., Sokolov, A. P., Stone, P., and Wang, C.: 2003, ‘Uncertainty analysis of climate change and policy responses’, Clim. Change 61, 295–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T. M. L.: 2003, Modeling Climate Change Under No-Policy and Policy Emissions Pathways, Working paper, OECD Workshop on Benefits of Climate Policy: Improving Information for Policymakers, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.

  • Wigley, T. M. L.: 2004, ‘Choosing a stabilisation target for CO2’, Clim. Change 67, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B.: 2001, ‘Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming’, Science 293, 451–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohe, G. W. and Schlesinger, M. E.: 1998, ‘Sea-level change: The expected economic cost of protection or abandonment in the United States’, Clim. Change 38, 447–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohe, G. and Tol, R. S. J.: 2002, ‘Indicators for social and economic coping capacity – moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity’, Global Environ. Change 12, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSIRO Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, 3195, Australia

    ROGER N. JONES

Authors
  1. ROGER N. JONES
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ROGER N. JONES.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JONES, R.N. Incorporating Agency Into Climate Change Risk Assessments. Climatic Change 67, 13–36 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-004-3761-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-004-3761-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation