Abstract
A long-asked question in children’s literature studies is how the child reads the very same book we (adults) have read. In 1984, Peter Hunt argued for a “childist criticism” proposing that young readers’ multiple individual responses to literature should inform adults’ critical practice. In this article, I propose that affect theory and new materialist epistemologies could reorient our critical practice in and with children’s literature. Using the concept of childist criticism (Hunt 1984, 1991) and Maggie MacLure’s (2013) notion of the “wonder of data,” I follow different encounters between children (and researchers) and the book La madre y la muerte/La partida (Laiseca et al., 2016). This book tells a macabre story about a mother that cannot bear to have her child taken away by Death. By following the book’s agency (García-González & Deszcz-Tryhubczak, 2020) in the research assemblage of different projects, I propose possible affective methodological orientations to post-representational research for children’s literature criticism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This project, and the following two presented in this article, were overseen and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile.
References
Ahern, S. (Ed.). (2018). Affect Theory and Literary Critical Practice: A Feel for the Text. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Anker, Elizabeth. (2012). Fictions of Dignity: Embodying Human Rights in World Literature. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Anker, Elizabeth, and Felski, Rita. (Eds.). (2017). Critique and Postcritique. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press Books.
Arispe, Nicolás, Laiseca, Alberto, and Chimal, Alberto. (2015). La Madre y La Muerte / La Partida. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Barad, Karen. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press Books.
Barad, Karen. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
Beauvais, Clémentine. (2015). The Mighty Child: Time and Power in Children’s Literature. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Bewes, T. (2018). The surge: Turning Away from Affect. Deleuze and Guattari Studies, 12(3), 313–335.
Biswas, Tanu. (2020). Little Things Matter Much: Childist Ideas for a Pedagogy of Philosophy in an Overheated World. Munich, Germany: Büro Himmelgrün Munich.
Boldt, G., & Leander, K. M. (2020). Affect Theory in Reading Research: Imagining the Radical Difference. Reading Psychology, 1–18.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Oxford, United Kingdom: Polity.
Chapleau, Sebastien. (2009). “Work in progress: Children’s Literature and Childist Criticism—Towards an Institutional Re-consideration.” Doctoral Thesis, Cardiff University.
Clough, Patricia. (2008). The Affective Turn: Political Economy, Biomedia and Bodies. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(1), 1–22.
Coole, Diana, and Frost, Samantha. (Eds.). (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
Coleman, Rebecca, and Ringrose, Jesssica (Eds.) (2013) Deleuze and Research Methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Córdova, Adolfo. (2016) Las Madres Rastreadoras Y La Muerte. (2016). Linternas y Bosques. Accessed from https://linternasybosques.com/2016/05/11/las-madres-rastreadoras-y-la-muerte/
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Deszcz-Tryhubczak, Justyna. (2016). Using Literary Criticism for Children’s Rights: Toward a Participatory Research Model of Children’s Literature Studies. The Lion and the Unicorn, 40(2), 215–231.
Deszcz-Tryhubczak, Justyna, and García-González, Macarena (2022). Thinking and Doing with Childism in Children’s Literature Studies. Childhood.
Deszcz-Tryhubczak, Justyna, and Marecki, Mateusz. (2021). A Meta-critical Reflection on Children and Young People. Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Deszcz-Tryhubczak, Justyna, and Kalla, Irena. (Eds.). (2021). Children’s Literature and Intergenerational Relationships. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Deszcz-Tryhubczak, Justyna, & Jaques, Zoe. (Eds.). (2021). Intergenerational Solidarity in Children’s Literature and Film. Jackson, United States: University Press of Mississippi.
Ehret, Christian, and Rowsell, Jennifer. (2021). Literacy, Affect, and Uncontrollability. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 201–206.
Felski, Rita. (2011). Suspicious Minds. Poetics Today; 32 (2): 215–234.
Felski, Rita. (2015). The Limits of Critique. Chicago, United States: University of Chicago Press.
Felski, Rita. (2020). Hooked: Art and Attachment. Chicago, United States: University of Chicago Press.
Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2015). New Materialist Social Inquiry: Designs, Methods and the Research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414.
García-González, M., & Deszcz-Tryhubczak, J. (2020). New Materialist Openings to Children’s Literature Studies. International Research in Children’s Literature, 13(1), 45–60.
García-González, M., Véliz, S., & Matus, C. (2020). Think Difference Differently? Knowing/Becoming/ doing with Picturebooks. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28(4), 543–562.
Gubar, Marah. (2013). Risky Business: Talking about Children in Children’s Literature Criticism. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 38, 450–457.
Gubar, Marah. (2009). Artful Dodgers: Reconceiving the Golden Age of Children’s Literature. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Haraway, Donna. (2016) Staying with the Trouble Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
Hunt, Peter. (1984). Childist Criticism: The Subculture of the Child, the Book and the Critic. Signal, 43(1), 42–59.
Hunt, P. (1991). Criticism, theory, and Children’s Literature. Oxford: Blackwell.
Joosen, Vanessa. (2021). Constructing Age for Young Readers. International Research in Children’s Literature, 14(3), 252–268.
Joosen, Vanessa. (in print) Connecting childhood studies, age studies and children’s literature studies: John Wall’s concept of childism and Anne Fine’s The Granny Project. Barnboken.
Latour, Bruno. (2004). Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(winter).
MacLure, Maggie. (2013). The Wonder of Data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228–232.
Murris, K. (2020). “Posthuman Child and the Diffractive Teacher: Decolonizing the Nature/Culture Binary”. In Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, Amy, Malone, Karen, and Barratt Hacking, Elizabeth (Eds.). Research Handbook on childhoodnature: assemblages of childhood and nature research. New York: Springer.
Nikolajeva, Maria. (2012). Guilt, Empathy and the Ethical Potential of Children’s Literature. Barnboken, 35(1).
Nikolajeva, Maria. (2009). Theory, Post-theory, and Aetheory. Neohelicon, 36, 13–24.
Reynolds, Kimberley. (2011). Children’s Literature: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Rose, Jacqueline. (1984). The Case of Peter Pan, or The Impossibility of Children’s Fiction. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosenblatt, Louise. (1995). Literature as exploration. New York, United States: The Modern Language Association of America.
Rosenblatt, Louise. (1978). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. United States: Southern Illinois University Press.
Smith, Victoria Ford. (2017) Between Generations: Collaborative Authorship in the Golden Age of Children’s Literature. Jackson, United States: University Press of Mississippi.
Thrift, N. (2004) Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect. Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geography, 86(1): 57–78.
Todorova, Marija. (2017). Children’s Voices from War Zones: Muted by Adult Mediation. Bookbird: A Journal of International Children’s Literature, 55(2), 20–27.
van Lierop-Debrauwer, H. (2022). Children’s literature. A Joint Venture. International Research in Children’s Literature, upcoming issue.
van Lierop-Debrauwer, H. and Steels, S. The Mingling of Teenage and Adult Breaths: The Dutch Slash Series as Intergenerational Communication. In Justyna Deszcz-Tryhubczak and Zoe Jaques (Eds) Intergenerational Solidarity inChildren’s Literature. University of Mississippi Press, 2021, pp. 218–30.
Wall, John. (2009). Childism and the Ethics of Responsibility. In Annemie, Dillen, and Pollefeyt Didier. (Eds.), Children’s Voices. Children’s Perspectives in Ethics, Theology, and Religious Education. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters-Publishing.
Wall, John. (2019). From Childhood Studies to Childism: Reconstructing the Scholarly and Social Imaginations. Children’s Geographies.
Wiegman, R. (2014). The times we’re in: Queer Feminist Criticism and the Reparative ‘Turn’. Feminist Theory, 15(1), 4–25.
Wesseling, Elizabeth. (2019). Researching Child Authors: Which Questions (not) to Ask. Humanities, 8(2), [87].
Young-Bruehl, E. (2013). Childism: Confronting Prejudice Against Children. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Statements and Declarations
This article is part of the funded research projects ANID - PIA (CIE160007) and FONDECYT 11180070.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
García-González, M. Towards an Affective Childist Literary Criticism. Child Lit Educ 53, 360–375 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-022-09500-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-022-09500-0