Advertisement

Children's Literature in Education

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 15–33 | Cite as

Reading in the Gaps and Lacks: (De)Constructing Masculinity in Louis Sachar’s Holes

  • Annette Wannamaker
Article

Abstract

Louis Sachar’s novel Holes (US, 1998; UK, 2000) has received much praise from both critics and child readers, who love the complex tall tale he has woven about two boys whose lives are connected by fate and an almost magical legacy of ancestral curses and obligations. Because the novel is not (on many levels) realistic, and relies heavily on folk tale motifs, fantastically exaggerated characters and situations, and surreal imagery, the boys, and the fictional world surrounding them, are constructed in less “politically correct” ways than fans of the book might initially recognize, or even want to admit. While Holes may, on the surface, appear to champion a kinder and gentler version of masculinity, on the level of the subconscious, it portrays a more visceral, more Oedipal version of boyhood attempting to distance itself from its mother (or (m)Other) and all things feminine. In the process of its narrative, Holes, as a text, often treats feminine traits, symbols, and characters as frightening, disgusting, or excessive aspects – like the gaping holes in the landscape or the cruel Warden – that need to be filled in, covered over, silenced, or expelled.

Keywords

Holes Sachar boys masculinity gender 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauerline, M., & Stotsky, S., “Why Johnny won’t read,” in The Washington Post, January 25, 2005, p. A15.Google Scholar
  2. Beneke, T. 1997Proving Manhood: Reflections on Men and SexismUniversity of California PressBerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, J. 1993Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’RoutledgeNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Coats, K. 2004Looking Glasses and Neverlands: Lacan, Desire and Subjectivity in Children’s LiteratureUniversity of Iowa PressIowa City, IowaGoogle Scholar
  5. Creed, B. 1993The Monstrous Feminine: Film, Feminism, PsychoanalysisRoutledgeNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Giroux, H. A. 1998“White noise: Toward a pedagogy of whiteness”Myrsiades, K.Myrsiades, L. eds. Race-ing Representation: Voice, History, and SexualityRowman & Littlefiled Publishers, Inc.New York4276Google Scholar
  7. Harris, I. M. 1995Messages Men Hear: Constructing MasculinitiesTaylor and FrancisBristol, PAGoogle Scholar
  8. Hipple, T., Maupin, A. B. 2001“What’s good about the best?”English Journal904042Google Scholar
  9. Kimmel, M. S. 2003“Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity”Ore, T. E. eds. Construction of Difference and InequalityMcGraw HillNew York119136Google Scholar
  10. Pinsent, P. 2002“Fate and Fortune in a Modern Fairy Tale: Louis Sachar’s Holes”Children’s Literature in Education33203212Google Scholar
  11. Pleck, J. H. 1992“Men’s power with women, other men, and society: A men’s movement analysis”Kimmel, M.Messner, M. A. eds. Men’s LivesMacmillan Publishing CompanyNew York1927Google Scholar
  12. Sabo, D. 1989“Pigskin patriarchy, and pain”Michael, K.Messner, M. eds. Men’s LivesMacMillan Publishing CompanyNew York184190Google Scholar
  13. Sachar, L., Holes. New York: Dell Yearling, 1998; London: Bloomsbury, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. Sedgwick, E. K. 1998“How to bring your kids up gay”Jenkins, H. eds. The Children’s Culture ReaderNew York UPNew York231240Google Scholar
  15. Yearwood, S. 2002“Popular postmodernism for young readers: Walk Two Moons, Holes, and Monster,’”The ALAN Review295053Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annette Wannamaker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations