Abstract
For the practical application of large sample activation analysis, an extensive characterization of the irradiation facility and of the measurement system — of sample size, flux-gradient, maximum count rate, size of irradiation and counting containers, estimation of created activity after irradiation and dose rate — is required.
The term, “large samples” is not unequivocal. Here the consideration is restricted to samples from several grams to 100 or 200 grams, which can be irradiated in existing irradiation facilities. Calculations were performed for about 1200 organic samples divided into 18 groups. The results are in about 400 tables. The effective Z number, Z/A ratio, mass attenuation for several gamma lines, the relative contribution of the main absorbing elements in the sample for effective cross sections and for gamma transmission are calculated for each sample. All these data have been calculated for various sizes of irradiation and measuring containers. Macroscopic thermal, epithermal, scattering and transport cross sections were used for calculation of self-shielding by five different methods. Owing to the limited space only a selection of the most pertinent values characterizing each group of samples is presented and discussed.
The main differences of Large Sample NAA to other nuclear analytical methods are self-shielding and gamma attenuation in the sample. The main object of this paper is to show up problems that may arise in LS-NAA through self-shielding and gamma attenuation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Overwater R. M. V. et al.: Anal. Chem. 68 (1996) 341.
Lin X. and Henkelman R.: J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 251 (2002) 197.
Food Composition Tables 1989, Levnedsmiddelstyrelsen, Copenhagen 1989.
McCance and Widdowson: The Composition of Foods, The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 5th Edition, Cambridge, UK.
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Suppl. 22, (Ed. Koivistonen P), Stockholm 1980.
Zweifel P. F.: Nucleonics 18 (1960) 174.
Gurfinkel J.: Nucleonics 21 (1963) 143.
Fleming R. F.: Int. J. Appl. Radiat. 33 (1982) 1263.
Erdtmann G. and Petri H.: In: Nuclear activation and radioisotopic methods of analysis, Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part 1, (Ed. Elving P.J.), John Wiley, NY, 1986.
Blaauw R. M.: Nucl. Sci Eng. 124 (1996) 431.
Sears V. F.: Neutron News 3 (1992) 26.
Nisle R. G.: Nucleonics 36 (1960) 86
Martinho E., Salgado J. and Goncalves I. F.: J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 261 (2004) 637.
M. J. Berger and J. H. Hubbell: http://physics.nist.gov/xcom
McMaster W. H., Del Grande Kerr N. and Mallett J. N.: UCRL-50174, 1969.
Gwozdz R. and Grass F.: Environm. Radiochem. Analysis, Special Publ. 234 (Ed G. W. A. Newton) Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 1999, p.289.
Gwozdz R., Hansen H. J., Rasmussen K. L. and Kunzendorf H.: Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 167 (1993) 161.
Kim J. I., Staerk H., and Fiedler J.: Nucl. Instr. Methods 177 (1989) 557.
Gwozdz R. and Grass F.: J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 244 (2000) 523.
Gwozdz R. and Grass F.: Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc. 81 (1999) 9.
Gwozdz R., Grass F., Polikarpov G., and Kutlakhmedov Yu.; In: Nuclear Physical Methods in Radioecological Investigations of Nuclear Test Site (Eds S. S. Hecker and K. K. Kadyrzhanov), NATO Science Series, 2000.
Gwozdz R., Chakrov P., Kazachevskiy I., Shishkov I., Kabirova G. and Poznyak V.: In: Environmental Protection against Radioactive Pollution, (Ed. K. K. Kadyrzhanov), Kluwer Acad. Publishers, NL, 2003, 159.
IAEA-TECDOC Large sample activation analysis, in press.
Hevesy G. and Levi H.: Det Kgl. Danske Videns. XV, 1938.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gwozdz, R., Grass, F. Standardization problems in INAA of large organic samples. Czech J Phys 56, D229–D240 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10582-006-1021-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10582-006-1021-6