PreMOn: LODifing linguistic predicate models

  • Marco RospocherEmail author
  • Francesco Corcoglioniti
  • Alessio Palmero Aprosio
Project Notes


PreMOn is a freely available linguistic resource for exposing predicate models (PropBank, NomBank, VerbNet, and FrameNet) and mappings between them (e.g., SemLink and the predicate matrix) as linguistic linked open data (LOD). It consists of two components: (1) the PreMOn Ontology, that builds on the OntoLex-Lemon model by the W3C ontology-Lexica community group to enable an homogeneous representation of data from various predicate models and their linking to ontological resources; and, (2) the PreMOn Dataset, a LOD dataset integrating various versions of the aforementioned predicate models and mappings, linked to other LOD ontologies and resources (e.g., FrameBase, ESO, WordNet RDF). PreMOn is accessible online in different ways (e.g., SPARQL endpoint), and extensively documented.


Predicate models Semantic web Linguistic linked open data Ontology-Lexica 



The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Sara Tonelli and Alessio Scussel in the development of PreMOn.


  1. Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Lowe, J. B. (1998). The Berkeley FrameNet project. In Proceeding of COLING-ACL’98.Google Scholar
  2. Burns, G. A. P. C., Hermjakob, U., & Ambite, J. L. (2016). Abstract meaning representations as linked data. In Proceeding of ISWC (pp. 12–20).Google Scholar
  3. Chiarcos, C., McCrae, J., Cimiano, P., & Fellbaum, C. (2013). Towards open data for linguistics: Linguistic linked data. In A. Oltramari et al. (Eds.), New trends of research in ontologies and lexical resources (pp. 7–25). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Corcoglioniti, F., Rospocher, M., & Aprosio, A. P. (2016a). Frame-based ontology population with PIKES. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 28(12), 3261–3275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corcoglioniti, F., Rospocher, M., Aprosio, A. P., & Tonelli, S. (2016b). Premon: A lemon extension for exposing predicate models as linked data. In Proceeding of LREC.Google Scholar
  6. Corcoglioniti, F., Rospocher, M., Mostarda, M., & Amadori, M. (2015). Processing billions of RDF triples on a single machine using streaming and sorting. In Proceeding of SAC (pp. 368–375).Google Scholar
  7. Eckle-Kohler, J., McCrae, J. P., & Chiarcos, C. (2015). lemonUby—A large, interlinked, syntactically-rich lexical resource for ontologies. Semantic Web Journal, 6(4), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. New York: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  9. Gangemi, A. (2010). What’s in a schema? In C. Huang, N. Calzolari, A. Gangemi, A. Lenci, A. Oltramari, L. Prevot (Eds.), Ontology and the lexicon (pp. 144–182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gangemi, A., Alam, M, Asprino, L., Presutti, V., & Recupero, D. R. (2016). Framester: A wide coverage linguistic linked data hub. In Proceeding of EKAW (pp. 239–254).Google Scholar
  11. Hellmann, S., Lehmann, J., Auer, S., & Brümmer, M. (2013). Integrating NLP using linked data. In Proceeding of ISWC 2013 (pp. 98–113).Google Scholar
  12. Hovy, E., Marcus, M., Palmer, M., Ramshaw, L., & Weischedel, R. (2006). OntoNotes: The 90% solution. In Proceeding of HLT-NAACL (short papers) (pp. 57–60).Google Scholar
  13. Lacalle, M. L. D., Laparra, E., & Rigau, G. (2014). Predicate matrix: Extending SemLink through WordNet mappings. In Proceeding of LREC.Google Scholar
  14. Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. McCrae, J. P., Aguado-De-Cea, G., Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Declerck, T., Gómez-Pérez, A., et al. (2012). Interchanging lexical resources on the semantic web. Language Resources and Evaluation, 46(4), 701–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCrae, J. P., Bosque-Gil, J., Gracia, J., Buitelaar, P., & Cimiano, P. (2017). The ontolex-lemon model: Development and applications. In Proceedings of eLex 2017 conference.Google Scholar
  17. Meyers, A., Reeves, R., Macleod, C., Szekely, R., Zielinska, V., Young, B., & Grishman. R. (2004). The NomBank project: An interim report. In HLT-NAACL 2004 workshop: Frontiers in corpus annotation.Google Scholar
  18. Ovchinnikova, E., Vieu, L., Oltramari, A., Borgo, S., & Alexandrov, T. (2010). Data-driven and ontological analysis of framenet for natural language reasoning. In N.C.C. Chair, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, M. Rosner, D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’10). Valletta: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar
  19. Palmer, M. (2009). SemLink: Linking PropBank, VerbNet and FrameNet. In Proceeding of GenLex 2009.Google Scholar
  20. Palmer, M., Gildea, D., & Kingsbury, P. (2005). The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1), 71–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rospocher, M., van Erp, M., Vossen, P., Fokkens, A., Aldabe, I., Rigau, G., et al. (2016). Building event-centric knowledge graphs from news. Web Semant, 37(C), 132–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rouces, J., de Melo, G., & Hose, K. (2015). FrameBase: Representing N-Ary relations using semantic frames. In Proceeding of ESWC 2015.Google Scholar
  24. Schuler, K. K. (2005). Verbnet: A broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
  25. Segers, R., Vossen, P., Rospocher, M., Serafini, L., Laparra, E., & Rigau, G. (2015). ESO: A frame based ontology for events and implied situations. In Proceeding of MAPLEX workshop.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fondazione Bruno Kessler – IRSTTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations