Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the Interrater Reliability of the Icelandic Version of K-SADS-PL DSM-5

  • Research
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry & Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) is a valuable tool for diagnosing mental disorders in children and adolescents. Previous studies have examined its interrater reliability, but there is limited information on individual disorders, on the updated DSM-5 version. This study aims to analyse the interrater reliability of the Icelandic translation of K-SADS-PL, DSM-5 version. K-SADS-PL was administered to a clinical sample of outpatients from the Icelandic Anxiety Centre for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults, and The Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at Landspítali, the National University Hospital in Reykjavík, Iceland. In total, 135 patients aged 6–18 were included in this study. We assessed the interrater reliability using Cohen’s κ, with results ranging from poor to excellent (0.3–1.0), though most disorders showed excellent reliability (κ > 0.75). The Icelandic translation of the DSM-5 K-SADS-PL is generally reliable when used by properly trained post-graduate students, which supports its use in clinical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Please contact authors regarding data inquiries.

References

  1. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, Williamson D, Ryan N (1997) Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36(7):980–988. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199707000-000214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Youngstrom EA, Prinstein MJ, Mash EJ, Barkley RA (2020) Assessment of Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence, 5th edn. Guilford Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Axelson D, Perepletchikova F, Brent D, and Ryan N (2016) Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-aged children: present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) DSM-5 November 2016 working draft. In: Yale University, Child and Adolescent Research and Education.

  5. Kaufman J, Schweder AE (2004) The schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children: present and lifetime version. In: Hersen M (ed) Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment personality assessment, vol 2. John Wiley, Hoboken, p 2474

    Google Scholar 

  6. de la Pena FR, Villavicencio LR, Palacio JD, Felix FJ, Larraguibel M, Viola L, Ortiz S, Rosetti M, Abadi A, Montiel C, Mayer PA, Fernandez S, Jaimes A, Feria M, Sosa L, Rodriguez A, Zavaleta P, Uribe D, Galicia F et al (2018) Validity and reliability of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia present and lifetime version DSM-5 (K-SADS-PL-5) Spanish version. BMC Psychiatry 18(1):193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1773-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Marques CC, Matos AP, do Céusalvador M, Arnarson EÖ, Craighead WE (2022) Reliability and validity of the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): portuguese version. Child Psychiatry Human Dev 53(6):1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-021-01196-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishiyama T, Sumi S, Watanabe H, Suzuki F, Kuru Y, Shiino T, Kimura T, Wang C, Lin Y, Ichiyanagi M (2020) The kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) for DSM-5: a validation for neurodevelopmental disorders in Japanese outpatients. Compr Psychiatry 96:152148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dun Y, Li Q-R, Yu H, Bai Y, Song Z, Lei C, Li H-H, Gong J, Mo Y, Li Y (2022) Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the kiddie-schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia-present and lifetime version DSM-5 (K-SADS-PL-C DSM-5). J Affect Disord 317:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kariuki SM, Newton CR, Abubakar A, Bitta MA, Odhiambo R, Phillips Owen J (2020) Evaluation of psychometric properties and factorial structure of ADHD module of K-SADS-PL in children from rural Kenya. J Atten Disord 24(14):2064–2071. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054717753064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Unal F, Oktem F, Cetin Cuhadaroglu F, Cengel Kultur SE, Akdemir D, Foto Ozdemir D, Cak HT, Unal D, Tiras K, Aslan C, Kalayci BM, Aydos BS, Kutuk F, Tasyurek E, Karaokur R, Karabucak B, Karakok B, Karaer Y, Artik A (2019) Reliability and validity of the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version, DSM-5 November 2016-turkish adaptation (K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T). Turk Psikiyatri Derg 30(1):42–50. https://doi.org/10.5080/u23408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Þórðarson Ó, Ævarsson FM, Helgadóttir S, Lauth B, Wessman I, Sigurjónsdóttir SA, Smárason O, Harðardóttir HH, Skarphedinsson G (2020) Icelandic translation and reliability data on the DSM-5 version of the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-aged children–present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL). Nordic J Psychiatry 74(6):423–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2020.1733660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinhausen HC, Erdin A (1991) The inter-rater reliability of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders in the ICD-10. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 32(6):921–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb01919.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Makino T, Suzuki F, Nishiyama T, Ishibashi S, Nakamichi H, Iida T, Shimada S, Tomari S, Imanari E, Higashi T (2023) Psychometrics of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia present and lifetime version for DSM-5 in Japanese outpatients. Int J Methods Psychiatric Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De Los Reyes A, Kazdin AE (2005) Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychol Bull 131(4):483–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bujang MA, Baharum N (2017) Guidelines of the minimum sample size requirements for Kappa agreement test. Epidemiol Biostatist Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2427/12267

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Iceland Research Fund. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection or statistical analysis were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HHH and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Hektor Hannesson.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethical Approval

Permission for this study was given by the Icelandic National Bioethics Committee (permission number 17–198).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hannesson, H.H., Smárason, O., Højgaard, D.R.M.A. et al. Evaluating the Interrater Reliability of the Icelandic Version of K-SADS-PL DSM-5. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-023-01644-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-023-01644-4

Keywords

Navigation