Research examining the nature and extent of participation in antisocial behavior (ASB) in typically developing individuals during late adolescence and early adulthood remains rare. A self-report instrument for measuring participation in ASB was developed and administered to an Australian sample of 404 youth (64.9% females) aged 17 to 22-years using item-response theory methods. All participants reported involvement in multiple forms of ASB, although this involvement was skewed toward less serious behaviors, suggesting that engagement in these behaviors were common for typically developing youth. Unlike previous research, few sex differences were detected, with females’ self-reported involvement in ASB similar to that of males. A need for ongoing longitudinal research in typically developing samples was highlighted, particularly on the transition to adulthood.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5, 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association
Burt SA (2009) Are there meaningful etiological differences within antisocial behavior? Results of a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 29(2):163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.12.004
DeLisi M, Piquero AR (2011) New frontiers in criminal careers research, 2000–2011: a state-of-the-art review. J Crim Justice 39(4):289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.05.001
Moffitt TE (2018) Male antisocial behaviour in adolescence and beyond. Nat Hum Behav 2(3):177–186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0309-4
Piquero AR, Farrington DP, Blumstein A (2007) Key issues in criminal career research: new analyses of the cambridge study in delinquent development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Loeber R, Menting B, Lynam DR, Moffitt TE, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Stallings R et al (2012) Findings from the Pittsburgh Youth Study: cognitive impulsivity and intelligence as predictors of the age-crime curve. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 51(11):1136–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.08.019
Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Harrington H, Milne BJ (2002) Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: follow-up at age 26 years. Dev Psychopathol 14(1):179–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579402001104
Elonheimo H, Gyllenberg D, Huttunen J, Ristkari T, Sillanmäki L, Sourander A (2014) Criminal offending among males and females between ages 15 and 30 in a population-based nationwide 1981 birth cohort: Results from the FinnCrime Study. J Adolesc 37(8):1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.09.005
Blokland AAJ, Nieuwbeerta P (2005) The effects of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology 43(4):1203–1240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2005.00037.x
Brennan PA, Mednick SA, Hodgins S (2000) Major Mental Disorders and Criminal Violence in a Danish Birth Cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57(5):494–500
Bor W, McGee TR, Fagan AA (2004) Early risk factors for adolescent antisocial behaviour: an Australian longitudinal study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 38(5):365–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01365.x
Stewart A, Allard T, Gray B, Ogilvie J (2007) Understanding initiation of offending and recidivism across the juvenile and adult justice systems. Justice Modelling @ Griffith, Griffith University, Brisbane
Australian Institute of Criminology (2014) Australian crime: facts and figures 2013. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra
Enzmann D, Marshall IH, Killias M, Junger-Tas J, Steketee M, Gruszczynska B (2010) Self-reported youth delinquency in Europe and beyond: first results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study in the context of police and victimization data. Eur J Criminol 7(2):159–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370809358018
Blumstein A, Cohen J, Roth J, Visher CA (1986) Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals”. Report of the National Academy of Sciences Panel on Criminal Careers. National Academy Press, Washington, DC1
Jolliffe D, Farrington DP, Piquero AR, MacLeod JF, van de Weijer S (2017) Prevalence of life-course-persistent, adolescence-limited, and late-onset offenders: a systematic review of prospective longitudinal studies. Aggress Violent Behav 33:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.002
Moffitt TE (2006) A review of research on the taxonomy of life-course persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In: Cullen FT, Wright JP, Blevins KR (eds) Taking stock: the status of criminological theory advances in criminological theory. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 277–31115
Stolzenberg L, D'Alessio SJ (2008) Co-offending and the age-crime curve. J Res Crime Delinq 45(1):65–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427807309441
Warr M (2002) Companions in crime: the social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Burt SA (2012) How do we optimally conceptualize the heterogeneity within antisocial behavior? An argument for aggressive versus non-aggressive behavioral dimensions. Clin Psychol Rev 32(4):263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.006
Tremblay RE (2010) Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: The 'original sin' hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51(4):341–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02211.x
Gatti U, Soellner R, Schadee HMA, Verde A, Rocca G (2013) Effects of delinquency on alcohol use among Juveniles in Europe: results from the ISRD-2 study. Eur J Crim Policy Res 19(2):153–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-013-9202-x
Pulkkinen L, Lyyra A-L, Kokko K (2009) Life success of males on nonoffender, adolescence-limited, persistent, and adult-onset antisocial pathways: follow-up from age 8 to 42. Aggress Behav 35(2):117–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20297
Junger-Tas J, Marshall IH (1999) The self-report methodology in crime research. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 25:291–368. https://doi.org/10.1086/449291
Curcio AL, Mak AS, Knott VE (2015) The Australian self-report delinquency scale: a revision. Aust J Psychol 67(3):166–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12075
Rutter M (2003) Commentary: Causal processes leading to antisocial behavior. Dev Psychol 39(2):372–378
Osgood DW, McMorris BJ, Potenza MT (2002) Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance I: item response theory scaling. J Quant Criminol 18(3):267–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016008004010
Piquero AR, MacIntosh R, Hickman M (2002) The validity of a self-reported delinquency scale: comparisons across gender, age race, and place of residence. Sociol Methods Res 30(4):492–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124102030004002
Raudenbush SW, Johnson C, Sampson RJ (2003) A multivariate, multilevel Rasch model with application to self-reported criminal behavior. Sociol Methodol 33(1):169–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2003.t01-1-00130.x
Farrington DP, Ttofi MM (2014) Criminal careers in self-reports compared with official records. Crim Behav Ment Health 24(4):225–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1932
Carroll A, Durkin K, Houghton S, Hattie J (1996) An adaptation of Mak's self-reported delinquency scale for Western Australian adolescents. Aust J Psychol 48(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539608259498
Elliott DS, Huizinga D, Ageton SS (1985) Explaining delinquency and drug use. Sage, Beverly Hills
Le Blanc M, Bouthillier C (2003) A developmental test of the general deviance syndrome with adjudicated girls and boys using hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Crim Behav Ment Health 13:81–105
Brener ND, Kann L, Shanklin S, Kinchen S, Easton DK, Hawkins J et al (2013) Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system - 2013. Centers Dis Control Prev Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62(1):1–25
Flesch R (1948) A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 32(3):221–233
Snow PC, Powell MB (2012) Youth (in)justice: Oral language competence in early life and risk for engagement in antisocial behaviour in adolescence. Trends Issues Crime Crim Justice 435:421
The National Health and Medical Research Council (2015) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007. In: Australian Research Council and the Australian Vice-Cancellors' Committee (Ed.). Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
Revelle W (2017) psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research, 1st.7.5 edn. Northwestern University, Evanston
Core Team R (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Samejima F (1969) Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychom Monogr 17(4):1
Chalmers RP (2012) mirt: a multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. J Stat Softw 48(6):1–29
McDonald RP (1999) Test theory: a unified treatment. Psychology Press, New York
Stout WF (1990) A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika 55(2):293–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295289
Harwell M, Stone CA, Hsu T-C, Kirisci L (1996) Monte Carlo studies in item response theory. Appl Psychol Meas 20(2):101–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169602000201
Kang T, Chen TT (2008) Performance of the generalized S-X2 item fit index for polytomous IRT models. J Educ Meas 45(4):391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00071.x
Orlando M, Thissen D (2000) Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Appl Psychol Meas 24(1):50–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216000241003
Orlando M, Thissen D (2003) Further investigation of the performance of S - X2: an item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Appl Psychol Meas 27(4):289–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621603027004004
Thissen D, Pommerich M, Billeaud K, Williams VSL (1995) Item response theory for scores on tests including polytomous items with ordered responses. Appl Psychol Meas 19(1):39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169501900105
Brindle KA, Bowles TV, Freeman E (2019) A retrospective examination of antisocial and risk-taking behaviours. Psychiatry Psychol Law 26(4):644–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2019.1618747
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2014) National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report 2013. Drug Statistics Series No. 28. Cat No. PHE 183. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra
Krohn MD, Thornberry TP, Gibson CL, Baldwin JM (2010) The development and impact of self-report measures of crime and delinquency. J Quant Criminol 26(4):509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9119-1
Canter RJ (1982) Sex differences in self-report delinquency. Criminology 20(3–4):373–394
Bacon AM, Burak H, Rann J (2014) Sex differences in the relationship between sensation seeking, trait emotional intelligence and delinquent behaviour. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol 25(6):673–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.943796
Moffitt TE (2006) Life-course-persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen DJ (eds) Developmental psychopathology, vol 3, 2nd edn. Wiley, Newark, pp 570–598
Roisman GI, Monahan KC, Campbell SB, Steinberg L, Cauffman E (2010) Is adolescence-onset antisocial behavior developmentally normative? Dev Psychopathol 22(2):295–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000076
JO was awarded an Australian Postgraduate Scholarship to support the completion of this research.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in this study with human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (The National Health and Medical Research Council 2015).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ogilvie, J.M., Stewart, A. & Shum, D.H.K. Measuring Engagement in Antisocial Behavior During Late Adolescence and Early Adulthood for Typically Developing Youth. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 52, 248–269 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01005-5
- Antisocial behavior
- Item-response theory