Improving Maternal Representations in High-Risk Mothers: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Mom Power Parenting Intervention
- 399 Downloads
A key mechanism of risk transmission between maternal risk and child outcomes are the mother’s representations. The current study examined the effects of an attachment-based, trauma-informed parenting intervention, the Mom Power (MP) program, in optimizing maternal representations of high-risk mothers utilizing a randomized, controlled trial design (NCT01554215). High-risk mothers were recruited from low-income community locations and randomized to either the MP Intervention (n = 42) or a control condition (n = 33) in a parallel design. Maternal representations were assessed before and after the intervention using the Working Model of the Child Interview. The proportion of women with balanced (secure) representations increased in the MP group but not in the control group. Parenting Reflectivity for mothers in the treatment group significantly increased, with no change in the control condition. Participation in the MP program was associated with improvements in a key indicator of the security of the parent–child relationship: mothers’ representations of their children.
KeywordsAttachment Maternal representations Parenting Intervention research Randomized Controlled trial
The research presented was supported through funds from the State of Michigan, Department of Community Health, (PI: Muzik, F023865-2009 and F029321-2010); Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research (MICHR) (PI: Rosenblum, UL1RR024986-2010), and the Robert Wood Johnson Health & Society Scholars Program (PI: Muzik; N012918-2010). We thank the community agencies (i.e., Starfish Family Services, Inkster, Michigan; The Guidance Center, Southgate, Michigan) and their clinicians serving the families for participating in this trial. We thank the families who participated in this project. We acknowledge the valuable efforts of the Mom Power project staff in program development, implementation and data collection.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 6.Sroufe A, Egeland B, Carlson E, Collins W (2005) The development of the person. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 9.Muzik M, Rosenblum K, Schuster M (2010) Mom power curriculum. University of Michigan, Unpublished ManualGoogle Scholar
- 12.Bowlby J (1969) Attachment. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bretherton I, Munholland K (2008) Internal working models in attachment relationships: elaborating a central construct in attachment theory. In: Cassidy IJ, Shaver PR (eds) Handbook of attachment: theory, research and clinical applications. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 102–127Google Scholar
- 18.Slade A, Aber J, Berger B, Bresgi I, Kaplan M (2002) The parent development interview-revised. Yale Child Study Center, Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
- 23.Zeanah CH, Benoit D (1995) Clinical applications of a parent perception interview in infant mental health. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 4:539–554Google Scholar
- 24.Rosenblum KL, Dayton C, McDonough S (2006) Communicating feelings: links between mothers’ representations of their infants, parenting, and infant emotional development parenting representations, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 26.Zeanah CH, Benoit D, Hirshberg L, Barton M, Regan C (1994) Mothers’ representations of their infants are concordant with infant attachment classifications. Dev Issues Psychiatry Psychol 1:9–18Google Scholar
- 46.NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2004) Affect dysregulation in the mother–child relationship in the toddler years: antecedents and consequences. Dev Psychopathol 16:43–68Google Scholar
- 56.Main M, Kaplan N, Cassidy J (1985) Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: a move to the level of representation. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev :66–104Google Scholar
- 66.Herman J (1992) Trauma and recovery: the aftermath of violence: from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 67.Erickson M, Egeland B (1999) The STEEP program: Linking theory and research to practice. Zero to Three 20:11–16Google Scholar
- 70.Powell B, Cooper G, Hoffman K, Marvin B (2013) The circle of security intervention: enhancing attachment in early parent-child relationships. Guilford Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 71.Lieberman AF, Van Horn P (2004) Assessment and treatment of young children exposed to traumatic events. In Osofsky JD (ed) Young children and trauma: intervention and treatment, Guilford Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 76.Wolfe J, Kimerling R (1997) Gender issues in the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM (eds) Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD, Guilford Press, New York, pp 192–238Google Scholar
- 78.Kilpatrick DG, Resnick HS, Saunders BE, Best CL (1989) The national women’s study PTSD module. Medical University of Souh Carolina, CharlestonGoogle Scholar