Evidence Supporting the Internal Validity of the Proposed ND-PAE Disorder

Original Article

Abstract

The internal validity of the proposed Neurobehavioral Disorder Associated with Prenatal Alcohol Exposure (ND-PAE) was evaluated in children diagnosed with either Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) or partial FAS who were 3–10 years of age and had enrolled in a math intervention study. Symptoms were coded as present or absent using assessments conducted in the study, including standardized measures of neurocognitive and behavioral functioning, parent interview, and direct observations of the child. The number of endorsed ND-PAE symptoms was not related to environmental factors but was moderately related to the child’s age. ND-PAE symptoms were highly consistent and this did not vary by age. Evidence suggested the ND-PAE adaptive symptoms may be too restrictive and only one symptom from this domain may be sufficient. Impulsiveness was not related to an endorsement of the ND-PAE disorder but research is needed with other clinical groups to establish the discriminative validity of this symptom.

Keywords

ND-PAE Prenatal alcohol Fetal alcohol Psychiatric disorder 

Supplementary material

10578_2017_738_MOESM1_ESM.docx (27 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 27 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statisical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, p. 798–801Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kable JA et al. (2015) Neurobehavioral disorder associated with prenatal alcohol exposure (ND-PAE): proposed DSM-5 diagnosis. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 47:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanders J (2013) ‘A window of opportunity’: The proposed inclusion of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder in the DSM-5. J Dev Disabil 19(3):7–14Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bishop S, Gahagan S, Lord C (2007) Re-examining the core features of autism: a comparison of autism spectrum disorder and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 48(11):1111–1121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Connor MJ et al (2006) A controlled social skills training for children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 74(4):639–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blashfield RK, Draguns JG (1976) Evaluative criteria for psychiatric classification. J Abnorm Psychol 85(2):140–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cronbach LJ (1990) Essentials of psychological testing, 5th edn. Harper and Row, Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coles CD, Kable JA, Taddeo E (2009) Math performance and behavior problems in children affected by prenatal alcohol exposure: intervention and follow-up. J Dev Behav Pediatr 30(1):7–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kable JA, Coles CD, Taddeo E (2007) Socio-cognitive habilitation using the math interactive learning experience program for alcohol-affected children. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 31(8):1425–1434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coles CD et al (1997) Manual for scoring the Dysmorphia Checklist: Newborn version, Unpublished manuscript. Emory University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coles CD et al (2016) A comparison among 5 methods for the clinical diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 40(5):1000–1009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bertrand J and C. Interventions for Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Research (2009) Interventions for children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs): overview of findings for five innovative research projects. Res Dev Disabil 30(5):986–1006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elliot CD (1983) Differential Ability Scales, The Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaufman AS, Kaufman NL (1990) K-BIT : Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. American Guidance Service, Circle PinesGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gioia GA et al (2002) Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) in a clinical sample. Child Neuropsychol 8(4):249–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ginsburg H and Baroody AJ (1990) Test of early mathematics ability, 2nd edn. PRO-ED, Inc, AustinGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reid DK et al (2001) Test of Early Reading Ability, 3rd edn. PRO-ED, Inc, AustinGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Connolly AJ, American Guidance Service (1988) KeyMath revised, NU : a diagnostic inventory of essential mathematics. Normative update, NU. ed., Circle Pines, MN (4201 Woodland Rd., Circle Pines 55014–1796): American Guidance Service. x, p.245Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Woodcock RW, Johnson MB, and Mather N (1990) Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability :standard and supplemental batteries :WJ-R Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. DLM Teaching Resources, AllenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaplan, E., et al., WISC-III PI Manual. 1999, San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beery KE (1997) Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, 4th edn. Modern Curriculum Press, ParsippanyGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Achenbach T (1991) Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Achenbach T, Rescorla LA (1991) Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Korman M, Kirk U, Kemp S (1998) NEPSY: A developmental neuropsychological assessment, The Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Willcutt EG et al (1999) Utility of behavior ratings by examiners during assessments of preschool children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 27(6):463–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sparrow SS et al (1984) Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales : Interview Edition, survey form manual, American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, vol xiv, p. 301Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wiig EH, Secord W (1989) Test of language competence-expanded edition, The Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gresham FM, Elliott SN, American Guidance Service., SSRS ASSIST.(1991) American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN. p. 3 computer disks 3 1/2–5 1/4 in. + 1 manual (44 p.)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Henry J, Sloane M, Black-Pond C (2007) Neurobiology and neurodevelopmental impact of childhood traumatic stress and prenatal alcohol exposure. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 38(2):99–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Olson HC (2015) Advancing recognition of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: the proposed DSM-5 diagnosis of “neurobehavioral disorder associated with prenatal alcohol exposure (ND-PAE)”. Curr Dev Disord Rep 2(3):187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sackett PR, Yang H (2000) Correction for range restriction: an expanded typology. J Appl Psychol 85(1):112–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meehl PE (1996) Clinical versus statistical prediction : a theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. 1st softcover ed. The master work series, J. Aronson, Northvale, vol xviii, p. 149Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen TT et al (2014) The clinical utility and specificity of parent report of executive function among children with prenatal alcohol exposure. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 20(7):704–716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kable JA, Mukherjee RA (2017) Neurodevelopmental disorder associated with prenatal exposure to alcohol (ND-PAE): A proposed diagnostic method of capturing the neurocognitive phenotype of FASD. Eur J Med Genet 60(1):49–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bell CC, Chimata R (2015) Prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders among low-income African Americans at a clinic on Chicago’s south side. Psychiatr Serv 66(5):539–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Streissguth AP et al (1997) Primary and secondary disabilities in fetal alcohol syndrome, In: Streissguth AP, Kanter J (eds) The challenge of fetal alcohol syndrome: overcoming secondary disabilities, Seattle University of Washington Press, Seattle, p. 25–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesEmory University School of MedicineAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsEmory University School of MedicineAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations