Child Psychiatry & Human Development

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 445–454 | Cite as

Is Cyberbullying Related to Trait or State Anger?

  • Antonia Lonigro
  • Barry H. Schneider
  • Fiorenzo Laghi
  • Roberto Baiocco
  • Susanna Pallini
  • Thomas Brunner
Original Article

Abstract

Anger is a powerful emotion shared by victims and bullies in both physical and electronic forms of bullying. However, little is known about the specific roles of trait anger and state anger in involvement in bullying episodes. The purpose of this study was to verify which component of anger, trait or state, is more strongly related to physical and cyberbullying and victimization. Students between the ages 11–19 (N = 716, 392 female, 324 male) completed the state trait anger expression inventory-2 child and adolescent and a measure of victimization and bullying. Results for cyberbullying suggested a major vulnerability among bullies and victims to experience anger as a personality trait as well some links between state anger, cyberbullying and cybervictimization. Moreover, the outward, explosive expression of anger appears to be common among cyber and physical bullies. Implications for intervention programs are discussed.

Keywords

Bullying Cyberbullying Trait-anger State-anger Adolescence 

References

  1. 1.
    Mishna F (2012) Bullying: a guide to research, intervention, and prevention. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hinduja S, Patchin JW (2012) Cyberbullying: neither an epidemic nor a rarity. Eur J Dev Psychol 9:539–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tokunaga RS (2010) Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Hum Behav 26:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kowalski RM, Morgan CA, Limber SP (2012) Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. Sch Psychol Intern 33:505–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson M, Cassidy W, Brown K (2009) Out of the mouth of babes: students’ voice their opinions on cyber-bullying. Long Island Educ Rev 8:24–30Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dooley JJ, Pyzalski J, Cross D (2009) Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: a theoretical and conceptual review. J Psych 217:182–188Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laftman SB, Modin B, Östberg V (2012) Cyberbullying and subjective health: a large-scale study of students in Stockholm, Sweden. Child Youth Serv Rev 35:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campbell MA, Slee PT, Spears B, Butler D, Kift S (2013) Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. Sch Psychol Int 34:613–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campbell MA, Cross D, Spears B, Slee P (2010) Cyberbullying-legal implications for schools. Occasional paper 118. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic EducationGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cassidy W, Faucher C, Jackson M (2013) Cyberbullying among youth: a comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. Sch Psychol Int 34:575–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mishna F, Khoury-Kassabri M, Gadalla T, Daciuk J (2012) Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: victims, bullies, and bully–victims. Child Youth Serv Rev 34:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Agatston P, Kowalski R, Limber S (2012) Youth views on cyberbullying. In: Patchin JW, Hinduja S (eds) Cyberbullying prevention and response: expert perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp 57–71Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marczak M, Coyne I (2010) Cyberbullying at school: good practice and legal aspects in the United Kingdom. Aust J Guid Couns 20:182–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patchin JW, Hinduja S (2012) Cyberbullying: an update and synthesis of the research. In: Patchin JW, Hinduja S (eds) Cyberbullying prevention and response: expert perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp 13–35Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Topcu C, Erdur-Baker O (2012) Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. Sch Psychol Int 33:550–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ortega R, Elipe P, Mora-Merchán JA, Genta ML, Brighi A, Guarini A, Tippett N (2012) The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: a European cross-national study. Aggress Behav 38:342–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Izard CE (1971) The face of emotion. Appleton-Century-Crofts, East NorwalkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tomkins SS (1991) Affect imagery consciousness: Vol. III. The negative affects: Anger and fear. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Campos JJ, Frankel CB, Camras L (2004) On the nature of emotion regulation. Child Dev 75:377–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Izard CE (1993) Four system for emotion activation: cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psychol Rev 68:90–100Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Champion KL, Clay DL (2007) Individual differences in responses to provocation and frequent victimization by peers. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 37:205–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Candelaria AM, Fedewa AL, Ahn S (2012) The effects of anger management on children’s social and emotional outcomes: a meta-analysis. Sch Psychol Int 33:596–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Champion KM (2009) Victimization, anger, and gender: low anger and passive responses work. Am J Ortop 79:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lovegrove PJ, Henry KL, Slater MD (2012) Examination of the predictors of latent class typologies of bullying involvement among middle school students. J Sch Violence 11:75–93CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spielberger CD, Reheiser EC, Sydeman SJ (1995) Measuring the experience, expression and control of anger. Compr Pediatr Nurs 18:207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Deffenbacher JL, Oetting ER, Thwaites GA, Lynch RS, Baker DA, Stark RS, Thacker S, Eiswerth-Cox L (1996) State-trait anger theory and the utility of the Trait anger Scale. J Couns Psychol 43:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cassidy W, Jackson M, Brown K (2009) Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? Students’ experiences with cyber-bullying. Sch Psychol Int 30:383–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russel S, Tippett N (2008) Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 49:376–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brunner TM, Spielberger CD (1979) State-trait anger expression inventory-2 child and adolescent (STAXI-2 C/A). PAR, LutzGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Besevegis E, Dalla M, Gari A, Karademas CE (2008) The adaptation of state-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI-II) in the Greek language. Psychology 15:171–188Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Culhane SE, Morera OF (2010) Reliability and validity of the Novaco Anger Scale and provocation inventory (NAS-PI) and state-trait anger expression inventory-2 (STAXI-2) in Hispanic and non-hispanic white student samples. Hisp J Behav Sci 32:586–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mendoza O, Pozo H, Bello C (2010) Validation of the Mexican version of the State-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI-2). Acta Colom Psicologia 13:107–117Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Deschênes SS, Dugas MJ, Fracalanza K, Koerner N (2012) The role of anger in generalized anxiety disorder. Cogn Behav Ther 41:261–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sukhodolsky DG, Golub A, Cromwell EN (2001) Development and validation of the Anger Scale rumination. Pers Individ Differ 31:689–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ontario Ministry of Education (2009) Short bullying measure: a survey for students in grades 7–12 about equity and inclusive education, bullying/harassment. Qeen’s Printer for Ontario. Document available at www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/teachers/climate.html
  36. 36.
    Camodeca M, Goossens FA (2005) Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 46:186–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gansle K (2005) The effectiveness of school-based anger interventions and programs: a meta-analysis. J Sch Psychol 43:321–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sutton J, Smith PK, Swettwnham JS (1999) Bullying and theory of mind: a critique of the “Social Skills Deficit” view of antisocial behavior. Soc Dev 8:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Garner PW, Hinton HT (2010) Emotional display rules and emotion self-regulation: association with bullying and victimization in community-based after school programs. J Community Appl Soc 20:480–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nishina A, Juvonen J, Witkow M (2005) Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will make me feel sick: the psychosocial, somatic, and scholastic consequences of peer harassment. J Clin Child Adoles Psychol Psychiatr 34:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Poulin F, Boivin M (2000) Reactive and proactive aggression: evidence for two–factor model. Psychol Assess 12:115–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Salmivalli C, Nieminen E (2002) Proactive and reactive aggression in bullies, victims, and bully–victims. Aggress Behav 28:30–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Knight GP, Guthrie IK, Page MC, Fabes RA (2002) Emotional arousal and gender differences in aggression: a meta-analysis. Aggress Behav 28:366–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Amichai-Hamburger Y (2013) Youth internet and wellbeing. Comput Hum Behav 29:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. Horizon 9:1–6Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pozzoli T, Ang RP, Gini G (2012) Bystanders’ reactions to bullying: a cross-cultural analysis of personal correlates among Italian and Singaporean students. Soc Dev 21:86–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Farrington DP, Ttofi MM (2009) How to reduce school bullying. Vict Off 4:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Smith JD, Schneider BH, Smith PK, Ananiadou K (2004) The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: a synthesis of evaluation research. Sch Psychol Rev 33:547–560Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sahin M (2012) An investigation into the efficiency of empathy training program on preventing bullying in primary schools. Child Youth Serv Rev 34:1325–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Laghi F, Pallini S, D’Alessio M, Baiocco R (2011) Development and validation of the efficacious self-presentation Scale. J Gen Psychol 172:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonia Lonigro
    • 1
  • Barry H. Schneider
    • 2
  • Fiorenzo Laghi
    • 3
  • Roberto Baiocco
    • 3
  • Susanna Pallini
    • 4
  • Thomas Brunner
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Developmental and Social PsychologyUniversity of Rome SapienzaRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Social Development and Mental HealthUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Developmental and Social PsychologyUniversity of Rome SapienzaRomeItaly
  4. 4.Department of Educational ScienceUniversity of Rome IIIRomeItaly
  5. 5.Center for Character Strength Investment (CSI)TusconUSA

Personalised recommendations