Child Psychiatry & Human Development

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 306–321 | Cite as

Reinforcement Sensitivity and Risk for Psychopathology Following Exposure to Violence: A Vulnerability-Specificity Model in Latino Youth

  • Omar G. Gudiño
  • Erum Nadeem
  • Sheryl H. Kataoka
  • Anna S. Lau
Original Article


Urban Latino youth are exposed to high rates of violence, which increases risk for diverse forms of psychopathology. The current study aims to increase specificity in predicting responses by testing the hypothesis that youths’ reinforcement sensitivity—behavioral inhibition (BIS) and behavioral approach (BAS)—is associated with specific clinical outcomes and increases risk for the development of such problems following exposure to violence. Utilizing a short-term longitudinal design, Latino youth (N = 168) provided reports of BIS/BAS and emotional/behavioral problems at Time 1, exposure to violence between Time 1 and Time 2, and clinical symptoms at Time 2. Results suggested that reinforcement sensitivity moderated the relation between violence exposure and psychopathology, such that increasing levels of BIS were associated with elevated risk for internalizing and posttraumatic stress symptoms following exposure to violence whereas BAS increased risk for externalizing problems. The importance of building on existing knowledge to understand minority youth psychopathology is discussed.


Behavioral inhibition Behavioral approach Violence exposure Latino Internalizing Externalizing Posttraumatic stress 


  1. 1.
    Koop CE, Lundberg GD (1992) Violence in America: a public health emergency. JAMA 267:3075–3076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bureau of Justice Statistics (1997) Age patterns of victims of serious violent crime (Publication NCJ-162031). US Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
  3. 3.
    Stein BD, Jaycox LH, Kataoka S, Rhodes HJ, Vestal KD (2003) Prevalence of child and adolescent exposure to community violence. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 6:247–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aisenberg E (2001) The effects of exposure to community violence upon Latina mothers and preschool children. Hisp J Behav Sci 23:378–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gorman-Smith D, Tolan P (1998) The role of exposure to community violence and developmental problems among inner-city youth. Dev Psychopathol 10:101–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singer MI, Anglin TM, Song LY, Lunghofer L (1995) Adolescents’ exposure to violence and associated symptoms of psychological trauma. JAMA 273(6):477–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Youngstrom E, Weist MD, Albus KE (2003) Exploring violence exposure, stress, protective factors and behavioral problems among inner-city youth. Am J Community Psychol 32(1):115–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crouch JL, Hanson RF, Saunders BE, Kilpatrick DG, Resnick HS (2000) Income, race/ethnicity, and exposure to violence in youth: results from the National Survey of Adolescents. J Community Psychol 28(6):625–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramirez RR, De la Cruz GP (2003) The Hispanic population in the United States: March 2002. US Census Bureau, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodriguez MC, Morrobel D (2004) A review of Latino youth development research and a call for an asset orientation. Hisp J Behav Sci 26(2):107–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaycox LH, Stein BD, Kataoka SH, Wong M, Fink A, Escudero P et al (2002) Violence exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depressive symptoms among recent immigrant schoolchildren. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41(9):1104–1110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kliewer W, Lepore SJ, Oskin D, Johnson PD (1998) The role of social and cognitive processes in children’s adjustment to community violence. J Consult Clin Psychol 66(1):199–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kliewer W, Cunningham JN, Diehl R, Parrish KA, Walker JM, Atiyeh C et al (2004) Violence exposure and adjustment in inner-city youth: child and caregiver emotion regulation skill caregiver-child relationship quality, and neighborhood cohesion as protective factors. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 33(3):477–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCabe KM, Lucchini SE, Hough RL, Yeh M, Hazen A (2005) The relation between violence exposure and conduct problems among adolescents: a prospective study. Am J Orthopsychiatry 75(4):575–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Donnell DA, Schwab-Stone ME, Muyeed AZ (2002) Multidimensional resilience in urban children exposed to community violence. Child Dev 73(4):1265–1282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gray JA (1987) The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gray JA (1991) The neuropsychology of temperament. In: Stelau J, Angleiter A (eds) Explorations in temperament. Plenum, New York, pp 105–128Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smillie LD, Pickering AD, Jackson CJ (2006) The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: implications for psychometric measurement. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10:320–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gray JA (1978) The neuropsychology of anxiety. Br J Psychol 69(4):417–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carver CS, White TL (1994) Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 67(2):319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gray JA (1990) Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cogn Emot 4(3):269–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shapiro SK, Quay HC, Hogan AE, Schwartz KP (1988) Response perseveration and delayed responding in undersocialized aggressive conduct disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 97(3):371–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fonseca AC, Yule W (1995) Personality and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: an enquiry into Eysenck’s and Gray’s theories. J Abnorm Child Psychol 23(6):767–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matthys W, van Goozen SHM, de Vries H, Cohen-Kettenis PT, van Engeland H (1998) The dominance of behavioural activation over behavioural inhibition in conduct disordered boys with or without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 39(5):643–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kagan J, Snidman N, Zentner M, Peterson E (1999) Infant temperament and anxious symptoms in school age children. Dev Psychopathol 11(2):209–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reeb-Sutherland BC, Vanderwert RE, Degnan KA, Marshall PJ, Pérez-Edgar K, Chronis-Tuscano A, Pine DS, Fox NA (2009) Attention to novelty in behaviorally inhibited adolescents moderates risk for anxiety. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50(11):1365–1372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Coplan RJ, Wilson J, Frohlick SL, Zelenski J (2006) A person-oriented analysis of behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation in children. Pers Individ Dif 41(5):917–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vervoort L, Wolters LH, Hogendoorn SM, de Haan E, Boer F, Prins PJM (2010) Sensitivity of Gray’s behavioral inhibition system in clinically anxious and non-anxious children and adolescents. Pers Individ Dif 48:629–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Colder CR, O’Connor RM (2004) Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity model and child psychopathology: laboratory and questionnaire assessment of the BAS and BIS. J Abnorm Child Psychol 32(4):435–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Muris P, Meesters C, de Kanter E, Timmerman PE (2005) Behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation system scales for children: relationships with Eysenck’s personality traits and psychopathological symptoms. Pers Individ Dif 38(4):831–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Frick PJ (2004) Integrating research on temperament and childhood psychopathology: its pitfalls and promise. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 33(1):2–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pulkkinen L, Caspi A (eds) (2002) Paths to successful development: personality in the life course. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnson SL, Turner RJ, Iwata N (2003) BIS/BAS levels and psychiatric disorder: an epidemiological study. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 25(1):25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kataoka SH, Stein BD, Jaycox LH, Wong M, Escudero P, Tu W et al (2003) A school-based mental health program for traumatized Latino immigrant children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42(3):311–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Foa EB, Johnson KM, Feeny NC, Treadwell KRH (2001) The child PTSD symptom scale: a preliminary examination of its psychometric properties. J Clin Child Psychol 30(3):376–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Achenbach TM (1991) Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4–18, YSR, and TRF profiles. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Marin G, Marin BV (1991) Research with Hispanic populations. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2010) Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Satorra A, Bentler PM (2001) A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 66(4):507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jaccard J, Wan CK (1996) LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cicchetti D, Toth SL (1995) Developmental psychopathology and disorders of affect. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen DJ (eds) Developmental psychopathology: risk, disorder, and adaptation, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 369–420Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hilsman R, Garber J (1995) A test of the cognitive diathesis-stress model of depression in children: academic stressors, attributional style, perceived competence, and control. J Pers Soc Psychol 69(2):370–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Leyendecker B, Harwood RL, Lamb ME, Schölmerich A (2002) Mothers’ socialisation goals and evaluations of desirable and undesirable everyday situations in two diverse cultural groups. Int J Behav Dev 26:248–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fuligni AJ (1997) The academic achievement of adolescents from immigrant families: the roles of family background, attitudes, and behavior. Child Dev 68:351–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Portes A, Rumbaut R (1996) Immigrant American: a portrait, 2nd edn. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hoyle RH (1995) Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Loehlin JC (1992) Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2002) Teacher’s corner: how to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Struct Equ Modeling 9(4):599–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omar G. Gudiño
    • 1
    • 4
  • Erum Nadeem
    • 2
  • Sheryl H. Kataoka
    • 3
  • Anna S. Lau
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Division of Mental Health Services and Policy ResearchNew York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.New York University Child Study CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations