Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Experience Questionnaire in Adolescents: Descriptive Data, Reliability, and Factorial Validity

  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Social Experience Questionnaire (SEQ) in a sample of 1158 adolescents aged 13–17 years. Confirmatory factor analysis fit indices supported the hypothesized three-factor model of the SEQ that assesses overt and relational victimization, and prosocial behaviors from peers. Analyses of gender differences revealed that boys reported being overtly victimized more than girls, and girls reported greater receipt of prosocial behaviors from peers than boys. No gender differences in relational victimization were found. The internal consistency was adequate across gender, and test–retest stability over 12 months was modest. Intercorrelations among overt and relational victimization subscales suggest that these subscales assess related, but relatively independent constructs of peer victimization. These findings support the use of the SEQ with adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DS Hawker MJ Boulton (2000) ArticleTitleTwenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial adjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies J Child Psychol Psychiatry 41 441–455 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0021963099005545 Occurrence Handle10836674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. EA Storch C Masia-Warner MR Brassard (2003) ArticleTitleThe relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescence Child Stud J 33 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  3. NR Crick JK Grotpeter (1996) ArticleTitleChildren’s treatment by peers: victims of relational and overt aggression Develop Psychopath 8 367–380

    Google Scholar 

  4. EA Storch MK Nock C Masia-Warner ME Barlas (2003) ArticleTitlePeer victimization and social-psychological adjustment in Hispanic-American and African-American children J Child Fam Stud 12 439–452 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026016124091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. EA Storch CL Masia-Warner (2004) ArticleTitleThe relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescent females J Adolesc 27 351–362 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.003 Occurrence Handle15159093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. NR Crick MA Bigbee (1998) ArticleTitleRelational and overt forms of peer victimization: a multi-informant approach J Consult Clin Psychol 66 337–347 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.337 Occurrence Handle9583337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. MJ Prinstein J Boergers EM Vernberg (2001) ArticleTitleOvert and relational aggression in adolescents: Social-psychological adjustment of aggressors and victims J Clin Child Psychol 30 479–491 Occurrence Handle10.1207/S15374424JCCP3004_05 Occurrence Handle11708236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. L Bond JB Carlin L Thomas K Rubin G Patton (2001) ArticleTitleDoes bullying cause emotional problems? A prospective study of young teenagers BMJ 323 480–484 Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.323.7311.480 Occurrence Handle11532838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Storch EA, Masia-Warner C, Dent HC, Klein RG : Peer victimization and social anxiety in adolescence: A prospective study. Agg Beh, in press.

  10. EA Storch E Zelman M Sweeney G Danner S Dove (2002) ArticleTitleOvert and relational victimization, and psychosocial adjustment in minority preadolescents Child Stud J 32 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  11. EA Storch L Esposito (2003) ArticleTitlePeer victimization and posttraumatic stress in children Child Study J 33 91–98

    Google Scholar 

  12. L Cronbach (1951) ArticleTitleCoefficient alpha and the internal consistency of tests Psychometrika 16 297–334

    Google Scholar 

  13. PE Shrout JL Fleiss (1979) ArticleTitleIntraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability Psychol Bull 86 420–428 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. JL Arbuckle (1996) AMOS user’s guide, Version 3.6 Smallwaters Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  15. JF Hair RE Anderson WC TathamRL Black (1992) Multivariate data analysis with readings MacMillan New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. B Thompson (2004) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications American Psychological Association Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. BM Bryne (2001) Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming L Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  18. DL Streiner (2003) ArticleTitleBeing inconsistent about consistency: When coefficient alpha does and doesn’t matter J Per Assess 80 217–222 Occurrence Handle10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. CC Strauss CL Frame R Forehand (1987) ArticleTitlePsychosocial impairment associated with anxiety in children J Clin Child Psychol 16 235–240

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric A. Storch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Storch, E.A., Crisp, H., Roberti, J.W. et al. Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Experience Questionnaire in Adolescents: Descriptive Data, Reliability, and Factorial Validity. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 36, 167–176 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-005-3495-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-005-3495-z

Key words

Navigation