Changes in chromosome organization during PHA-activation of resting human lymphocytes measured by cryo-FISH

Abstract

During interphase, chromosomes are arranged into territories within a highly organized nuclear space containing several compartments. It is becoming clear that this complex nuclear arrangement is important for gene regulation and therefore expression. The study of chromosome organization in interphase requires high-resolution imaging methods that at the same time allow for flexible labelling strategies and preserve nuclear structure. Tokuyasu cryosections of cells or tissues provide a simple, high-resolution platform for performing immunolabelling and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on well-preserved samples. Here we show how FISH performed on thin cryosections (cryo-FISH) can be used for the study of chromosome organization at high resolution and in a quantitative manner. We have measured chromosome intermingling, volume and radial position, in resting and activated human lymphocytes, and observed chromosome-specific differences between the two cellular states. These differences are in part related to the nuclear expansion that occurs during activation, but are also likely to be tied to their different transcriptional profiles. Extrapolation of our dataset to the whole genome suggests that activated cells contain a lower amount of chromatin involved in intermingling than resting cells.

References

  1. Branco MR, Pombo A (2006) Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol 4: e138.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Branco MR, Pombo A (2007) Chromosome organization: new facts new models. Trends Cell Biol 17: 127–134.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Branco MR, Xie SQ, Martin S, Pombo A (2005) Correlative microscopy using Tokuyasu cryosections: applications for immunolabeling and in situ hybridization. In: D. Stephens, ed. Cell Imaging. Bristol UK, Scion.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bridger JM, Boyle S, Kill IR, Bickmore WA (2000) Re-modelling of nuclear architecture in quiescent and senescent human fibroblasts. Curr Biol 10: 149–152.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cremer M, von Hase J, Volm T et al. (2001) Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells. Chromosome Res 9: 541–567.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cremer M, Kupper K, Wagler B et al. (2003) Inheritance of gene density-related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei. J Cell Biol 162: 809–820.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cremer T, Cremer M, Dietzel S, Muller S, Solovei I, Fakan S (2006) Chromosome territories—a functional nuclear landscape. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18: 307–316.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Croft JA, Bridger JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore WA (1999) Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 145: 1119–1131.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dardick I, Setterfield G, Hall R, Bladon T, Little J, Kaplan G (1981) Nuclear alterations during lymphocyte transformation: relationship to the heterogeneous morphologic presentations of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Am J Pathol 103: 10–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dehghani H, Dellaire G, Bazett-Jones DP (2005) Organization of chromatin in the interphase mammalian cell. Micron 36: 95–108.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dellaire G, Bazett-Jones DP (2004) PML nuclear bodies: dynamic sensors of DNA damage and cellular stress. Bioessays 26: 963–977.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Faro-Trindade I, Cook PR (2006) A conserved organization of transcription during embryonic stem cell differentiation and in cells with high C value. Mol Biol Cell 17: 2910–2920.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gabdoulkhakova A, Henriksson G, Avkhacheva N, Sofin A, Bredberg A (2007) High rate of mutation reporter gene inactivation during human T cell proliferation. Immunogenetics 59: 135–143.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grabenbauer M, Geerts WJ, Fernadez-Rodriguez J, Hoenger A, Koster AJ, Nilsson T (2005) Correlative microscopy and electron tomography of GFP through photooxidation. Nat Methods 2: 857–862.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Guillot PV, Xie SQ, Hollinshead M, Pombo A (2004) Fixation-induced redistribution of hyperphosphorylated RNA polymerase II in the nucleus of human cells. Exp Cell Res 295: 460–468.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Handwerger KE, Gall JG (2006) Subnuclear organelles: new insights into form and function. Trends Cell Biol 16: 19–26.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hell SW (2007) Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science 316: 1153–1158.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hepperger C, Otten S, von Hase J, Dietzel S (2007) Preservation of large-scale chromatin structure in FISH experiments. Chromosoma 116: 117–133.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kreth G, Finsterle J, von Hase J, Cremer M, Cremer C (2004) Radial arrangement of chromosome territories in human cell nuclei: a computer model approach based on gene density indicates a probabilistic global positioning code. Biophys J 86: 2803–2812.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kysela K, Philimonenko AA, Philimonenko VV, Janacek J, Kahle M, Hozak P (2005) Nuclear distribution of actin and myosin I depends on transcriptional activity of the cell. Histochem Cell Biol 124: 347–358.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamond AI, Spector DL (2003) Nuclear speckles: a model for nuclear organelles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 605–612.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lomvardas S, Barnea G, Pisapia DJ, Mendelsohn M, Kirkland J, Axel R (2006) Interchromosomal interactions and olfactory receptor choice. Cell 126: 403–413.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin S, Pombo A (2003) Transcription factories: quantitative studies of nanostructures in the mammalian nucleus. Chromosome Res 11: 461–470.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nisman R, Dellaire G, Ren Y, Li R, Bazett-Jones DP (2004) Application of quantum dots as probes for correlative fluorescence conventional and energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 52: 13–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Noordermer D, Branco MR, Splinter E et al. (2008) Transcription and chromatin organization of a housekeeping gene cluster containing an integrated β-globin locus control region. PLoS Genetics 4(3): e1000016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Osborne CS, Chakalova L, Brown KE et al. (2004) Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat Genet 36: 1065–1071.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Parada LA, McQueen PG, Misteli T (2004) Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes. Genome Biol 5: R44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pombo A (2007) Advances in imaging the interphase nucleus using thin cryosections. Histochem Cell Biol 128: 97–104.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pombo A, Branco MR (2007) Functional organisation of the genome during interphase. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 451–455.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pombo A, Hollinshead M, Cook PR (1999a) Bridging the resolution gap: Imaging the same transcription factories in cryosections by light and electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 47: 471–480.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pombo A, Jackson DA, Hollinshead M, Wang Z, Roeder RG, Cook PR (1999b) Regional specialization in human nuclei: visualization of discrete sites of transcription by RNA polymerase III. EMBO J 18: 2241–2253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson JM, Takizawa T, Pombo A, Cook PR (2001) Correlative fluorescence and electron microscopy on ultrathin cryosections: bridging the resolution gap. J Histochem Cytochem 49: 803–808.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Simonis M, Klous P, Splinter E et al. (2006) Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet 38: 1348–1354.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Solovei I, Cavallo A, Schermelleh L et al. (2002) Spatial preservation of nuclear chromatin architecture during three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization (3D-FISH). Exp Cell Res 276: 10–23.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Soutoglou E, Dorn JF, Sengupta K et al. (2007) Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat Cell Biol 9: 675–682.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Spector DL (2003) The dynamics of chromosome organization and gene regulation. Annu Rev Biochem 72: 573–608.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tanabe H, Habermann FA, Solovei I, Cremer M, Cremer T (2002) Non-random radial arrangements of interphase chromosome territories: evolutionary considerations and functional implications. Mutat Res 504: 37–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tokuyasu KT (1973) A technique for ultracryotomy of cell suspensions and tissues. J Cell Biol 57: 551–565.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tolhuis B, Palstra RJ, Splinter E, Grosveld F, de Laat W (2002) Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. Mol Cell 10: 1453–1465.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Torelli G, Ferrari S, Donelli A et al. (1981) Sequence complexity and diversity of polyadenylated RNA molecules of human normal resting PHA-stimulated and leukemic lymphocytes. Nucleic Acids Res 9: 7013–7032.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Weibel ER (1979) Stereological Methods: Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wurtele H, Chartrand P (2006) Genome-wide scanning of HoxB1-associated loci in mouse ES cells using an open-ended chromosome conformation capture methodology. Chromosome Res 14: 477–495.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao Z, Tavoosidana G, Sjolinder M et al. (2006) Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat Genet 38: 1341–1347.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Pombo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Table S1

Relative and absolute intermingling volumes in resting and PHA-activated human lymphocytes obtained after cryo-FISH (DOC 26 kb).

Supplementary Table 2

Relative and absolute chromosome volumes in resting and PHA-activated human lymphocytes obtained after cryo-FISH (DOC 27 kb).

Supplementary Table 3

CT radial positions in resting and PHA-activated human lymphocytes obtained after cryo-FISH (DOC 27 kb).

Supplementary Figure 1

Example of the empirical thresholding criteria. A cryo-FISH of chromosome 5 (A) was segmented using different threshold levels of empirically find a mask that best fits the fluorescent signal from the chromosome paint (B). The mask of the ynder-thresholded image includes patches away from the main body of the CT that are likely to be background (arrowhead), whilst the mask of the over-thresholded image excludes areas of fluorescence that are clearly above the background level (arrowhead). Bar, 0.5 μm. (TIFF 1.81 mb)

Supplementary Figure 2

Frequency of section radii upon random sectioning. A, Schematic representation of how to obtain the frequency (f) of a class of section sizes from their radii (ri) and the 3D nuclear radius (R), using the formula shown on the right (zi is the axial position of the section of radius ri). B, Relative frequency of the different section sizes obtained from the sectioning of a nucleus of radius 1. (TIFF 887 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Branco, M.R., Branco, T., Ramirez, F. et al. Changes in chromosome organization during PHA-activation of resting human lymphocytes measured by cryo-FISH. Chromosome Res 16, 413 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-008-1230-x

Download citation

Key words

  • chromosome territory
  • cryosections
  • lymphocyte activation
  • radial position
  • stereology