Abstract
The effects of variable ionic liquid (IL) treatment time (1 s–60 min) on macroscale morphology evolution in biphasic cellulose xerogels were measured using nitrogen gas physisorption and Raman spectroscopy. Nitrogen gas adsorption/desorption measured a constant pore size (~ 12.5 nm diameter) in the xerogel phase and increasing BET surface area from 0.2 to 148.5 m2g−1 with increasing IL treatment time. Cellulose decrystallization and epoxy penetration measured using Raman spectroscopy confirmed that the xerogel phase is continuous and composed of decrystallized regenerated cellulose. The porosity of the xerogel phase (ϕV,S) decreased from 0.89 to 0.57 while the full sample porosity (ϕV,T) increased from 0.34 to 0.50 with increasing IL treatment time. Three regimes were identified to describe the propagation and growth of the regenerated xerogel cellulose phase—Regime A, Regime B, and Regime C. These results are compared with non-porous samples formed using the same IL treatment conditions to elucidate the role of solvent exchange on cellulose regeneration in these heterogeneous materials.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelhamid HN, Mathew AP (2022) Cellulose–metal organic frameworks (cellomofs) hybrid materials and their multifaceted applications: a review. Coord Chem Rev 451:214263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214263
Abdul Khalil HPS, Adnan AS, Yahya EB, Olaiya NG, Safrida S, Hossain MS, Balakrishnan V, Gopakumar DA, Abdullah CK, Oyekanmi AA, Pasquini D (2020) A review on plant cellulose nanofibre-based aerogels for biomedical applications. Polymers 12:1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081759
Aiello A, Cosby T, McFarland J, Durkin DP, Trulove PC (2022) Mesoporous xerogel cellulose composites from biorenewable natural cotton fibers. Carbohydr Polym 282:119040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.119040
Al-Ghouti MA, Da’ana DA (2020) Guidelines for the use and interpretation of adsorption isotherm models: a review. J Hazard Mater 393:122383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122383
Budtova T (2019) Cellulose Ii aerogels: a review. Cellulose 26:81–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2189-1
Cosby T, Aiello A, Durkin DP, Trulove PC (2021) Kinetics of ionic liquid-facilitated cellulose decrystallization by raman spectral mapping. Cellulose 28:1321–1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03643-3
Gericke M, Liebert T, Seoud OAE, Heinze T (2011) Tailored media for homogeneous cellulose chemistry: Ionic liquid/co-solvent mixtures. Macromol Mater Eng 296:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201000330
Haverhals LM, Reichert WM, De Long HC, Trulove PC (2010a) Natural Fiber Welding. Macromol Mater Eng 295:425–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201000005
Haverhals LM, Sulpizio HM, Fayos ZA, Trulove MA, Reichert WM, Foley MP, De Long HC, Trulove PC (2010b) Process variables that control natural fiber welding. Electrochem Soc Trans 33:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3484764
Huber T, Müssig J, Curnow O, Pang S, Bickerton S, Staiger MP (2012) A critical review of all-cellulose composites. J Mater Sci 47:1171–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5774-3
Long L-Y, Weng Y-X, Wang Y-Z (2018) Cellulose aerogels: synthesis, applications, and prospects. Polymers 10:1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10060623
Nishino T, Matsuda I, Hirao K (2004) All-cellulose composite. Macromolecules 37:7683–7687. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma049300h
Nishino T, Arimoto N (2007) All-cellulose composite prepared by selective dissolving of fiber surface. Biomacromol 8:2712–2716. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0703416
O’Sullivan AC (1997) Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4:173–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018431705579
Sharma A, Thakur M, Bhattacharya M, Mandal T, Goswami S (2019) Commercial application of cellulose nano-composites—a review. Biotechnol Rep 21:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00316
Shi W, Ching YC, Chuah CH (2021) Preparation of aerogel beads and microspheres based on chitosan and cellulose for drug delivery: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 170:751–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.214
Sing KSW, Everett DH, Rierotti RA, Rouquerol J, Siemieniewska T (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603
Sing KSW, Williams RT (2004) Physisorption hysteresis loops and the characterization of nanoporous materials. Adsorpt Sci Technol 22:773–782. https://doi.org/10.1260/0263617053499032
Song H, Zhang J, Niu Y, Wang Z (2010) Phase transition and rheological behaviors of concentrated cellulose/ionic liquid solutions. J Phys Chem B 114:6006–6013. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm101426p
Syeda HI, Yap PS (2022) A review on three-dimensional cellulose-based aerogels for the removal of heavy metals from water. Sci Total Environ 807:150606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150606
Wan C, Jiao Y, Wei S, Zhang L, Wu Y, Li J (2019) Functional nanocomposites from sustainable regenerated cellulose aerogels: a review. Chem Eng J 359:459–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.115
Xie S, Zhang X, Walcott MP, Lin H (2018) Applications of cellulose nanocrystals: a review. Eng Sci 2:4–16. https://doi.org/10.30919/es.1803302
Zaman A, Huang F, Jiang M, Wei W, Zhou Z (2020) Preparation, properties, and applications of natural cellulosic aerogels: a review. Energy Built Env 1:60–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2019.09.002
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research [MIPR# F4FGA08354G001]. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Navy or U.S. Air Force. The authors would like to thank Jeremiah Woodcock for his insightful discussions.
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research, F4FGA08354G001, Paul C. Trulove
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AA, PhD, Conceptualization; Design of experiment scheme, sample fabrication, and sample preparation (e.g., microtoming); gas sorption and optical imaging data collection and analysis; experimental calculations (i.e., cross-sectional area, porosity); Writing of the paper and cartoon creation. TC, PhD, Methodology design, data collection, and analysis of optical imaging and Raman spectroscopy data. DPD, PhD, Funding acquisition; Experimental program supervision. Prof. PCT, Funding acquisition; Experimental program supervision.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aiello, A., Cosby, T., Durkin, D.P. et al. Macroscale time-dependent ionic liquid treatment effects on biphasic cellulose xerogels. Cellulose 29, 8695–8704 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04801-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04801-5